NASASpaceFlight.com Forum
NASA Shuttle Specific Sections => Atlantis (Post STS-135, T&R) => Topic started by: Chris Bergin on 06/05/2006 02:28 am
-
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?id=4529
Moving the relevant PRCB graphical content into this thread. Full documents on L2. New information from teleconferences this weekend between top level ET managers.
-
-
This is how long it would take (add to the shipping date) if they go for the MAF option, as opposed to KSC.
-
Yes, that is a worry about STS 115 as that has it's own support mission requirement with STS-301. No 301 and no STS-115.
-
In case people are wondering why this thread is quite....main conversation is on here http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=7&posts=246&mid=40063#M40063
-
It would also seem that the "penciled in" flight of STS-116 could be pushed back to 2007 if it gets much tighter with the contingency days. Any word if the FAWG has or will put out a manifest soon?
-
What's a " FAWG "?
-
flight assignment working group