@RD170@ - 9/2/2008 2:26 PM
It´s funny, russian procedures for launching LV are so easy. It makes launching LV a boys game. Thanks to god we will keep this "know how" for all world. Russian mastering LV are not equaled nowadays in terms of simplicity by German, French, N.American, Chinese or any other school of engineering.
If Von Braunn, Korolev and Glushko see this from heaven now, they will be happy for human. This procedures will leave human to space forever.
squidf - 10/2/2008 9:53 AM
Thanks for the info. Where did you get that info?
Second-third stage separation, along with fairing jettison confirmed.
Some video of an orthodox priest blessing the Proton.
eeergo - 11/2/2008 12:40 PMSome video of an orthodox priest blessing the Proton.
Confirmation of the first burn ending. Now the vehicule is out of range, so second burn has to take place by its own, and they're ending the broadcast.
Trei thanking ILS' vice-president for his support, as this was her first live commentary (we'll forgive her then ;) )
Skyrocket - 11/2/2008 6:42 AMQuoteeeergo - 11/2/2008 12:40 PMSome video of an orthodox priest blessing the Proton.
Some kind of launch preparation seldom done to western launch vehicles. Only the Atlas-V which launched HellasSat came to my mind.
Jim - 11/2/2008 12:54 PMQuoteSkyrocket - 11/2/2008 6:42 AMQuoteeeergo - 11/2/2008 12:40 PMSome video of an orthodox priest blessing the Proton.
Some kind of launch preparation seldom done to western launch vehicles. Only the Atlas-V which launched HellasSat came to my mind.
The base chaplain visits the control rooms before launch and passes out a prayer for the mission.
GW_Simulations - 11/2/2008 10:32 AM
Is the red smoke in the last image normal?
GW_Simulations - 11/2/2008 7:32 PM
Is the red smoke in the last image normal?
jancarlobascu - 11/2/2008 4:49 AM
This launch is the 333rd for Proton rocket History
Nicolas PILLET - 11/2/2008 2:03 PMQuotejancarlobascu - 11/2/2008 4:49 AM
This launch is the 333rd for Proton rocket History
The 332nd if you don't take in account the suborbital launch of august 1970, what I do in my website :
http://www.kosmonavtika.com/lanceurs/proton/protonliste.html
DarthVader - 11/2/2008 6:34 PMILS have posted a video: http://www.ilslaunch.com/ils/we-have-liftoff/
As anyone recorded the webcast by any chance? I'd love to watch it :) Thanks.
Stan Black - 11/2/2008 2:35 PMQuoteNicolas PILLET - 11/2/2008 2:03 PMQuotejancarlobascu - 11/2/2008 4:49 AM
This launch is the 333rd for Proton rocket History
The 332nd if you don't take in account the suborbital launch of august 1970, what I do in my website :
http://www.kosmonavtika.com/lanceurs/proton/protonliste.html
Why exclude that one? It wasn't the only sub-orbital Proton!
edkyle99 - 11/2/2008 3:35 PMQuoteStan Black - 11/2/2008 2:35 PMQuoteNicolas PILLET - 11/2/2008 2:03 PMQuotejancarlobascu - 11/2/2008 4:49 AM
This launch is the 333rd for Proton rocket History
The 332nd if you don't take in account the suborbital launch of august 1970, what I do in my website :
http://www.kosmonavtika.com/lanceurs/proton/protonliste.html
Why exclude that one? It wasn't the only sub-orbital Proton!
It was the only planned suborbital Proton flight.
- Ed Kyle
Stan Black - 11/2/2008 3:36 PMQuoteedkyle99 - 11/2/2008 3:35 PMQuoteStan Black - 11/2/2008 2:35 PMQuoteNicolas PILLET - 11/2/2008 2:03 PMQuotejancarlobascu - 11/2/2008 4:49 AM
This launch is the 333rd for Proton rocket History
The 332nd if you don't take in account the suborbital launch of august 1970, what I do in my website :
http://www.kosmonavtika.com/lanceurs/proton/protonliste.html
Why exclude that one? It wasn't the only sub-orbital Proton!
It was the only planned suborbital Proton flight.
- Ed Kyle
Still it did launch
edkyle99 - 11/2/2008 3:43 PMQuoteStan Black - 11/2/2008 3:36 PMQuoteedkyle99 - 11/2/2008 3:35 PMQuoteStan Black - 11/2/2008 2:35 PMQuoteNicolas PILLET - 11/2/2008 2:03 PMQuotejancarlobascu - 11/2/2008 4:49 AM
This launch is the 333rd for Proton rocket History
The 332nd if you don't take in account the suborbital launch of august 1970, what I do in my website :
http://www.kosmonavtika.com/lanceurs/proton/protonliste.html
Why exclude that one? It wasn't the only sub-orbital Proton!
It was the only planned suborbital Proton flight.
- Ed Kyle
Still it did launch
Right. All that Nicolas is saying is that it was the 332nd orbital Proton attempt. It was also the 333rd Proton launch.
- Ed Kyle
edkyle99 - 11/2/2008 10:35 PMQuoteStan Black - 11/2/2008 2:35 PMQuoteNicolas PILLET - 11/2/2008 2:03 PMQuotejancarlobascu - 11/2/2008 4:49 AM
This launch is the 333rd for Proton rocket History
The 332nd if you don't take in account the suborbital launch of august 1970, what I do in my website :
http://www.kosmonavtika.com/lanceurs/proton/protonliste.html
Why exclude that one? It wasn't the only sub-orbital Proton!
It was the only planned suborbital Proton flight.
- Ed Kyle
(from various posters)Why exclude that one? It wasn't the only sub-orbital Proton!
It was the only planned suborbital Proton flight.
Still it did launch
...well, it was also the 4549th orbital launch, the 2799th orbital russian launch and the 1203rd orbital launch from Baykonur... if my charts are wrong!!!
Just to do a little Nitpicking: all the Proton flights with Breeze upperstage are in fact suborbital (for the three Proton stages) - only Breeze and the payload reach orbit.
"See the little phrases go.
Watch their funny antics.
The men that make them wiggle so
are teachers of Semantics"
Frederick Winsor, "The Space Child Mother Goose"
:laugh:edkyle99 - 11/2/2008 10:43 PM
Right. All that Nicolas is saying is that it was the 332nd orbital Proton attempt. It was also the 333rd Proton launch.
- Ed Kyle
Nicolas PILLET - 12/2/2008 5:39 AMQuoteedkyle99 - 11/2/2008 10:43 PM
Right. All that Nicolas is saying is that it was the 332nd orbital Proton attempt. It was also the 333rd Proton launch.
- Ed Kyle
Exactly ! :)
Gorizont - 13/2/2008 9:02 PM
Hello, I think that was the 335th launch.
I used the list on "www.tbs-satellite.com" and I think it should be the most complete one.
Also I saved the list/webpage and filled some more information in it, for example launch-times and real names fore some of the "cosmos"-types.
greetings... Soeren
Gorizont - 13/2/2008 11:02 PM
But: By the way, there is another problem.
The Proton with Express-AM1-launch had a "300 PUSK" writing at on of the strap-on-tanks. Have you any idea, why? At all lists, I found, this was not the 300. launch.
(I mean this picture, which you marked with "Proton-K Blok-DM-2M (Ekspress-A 1R)" on your page.)
Perhaps is it the 300. launch of the Block-D-type upper-stage.