I've always assumed that Red Dragon would be Dragon derived. My question about the friction welding is because here using a counter thread seems easier. But that would need to stop the drill, put the new segment on top. Have a mechanism to do the counter screwing. And start the drill again.In a friction welded case, you keep moving the drill, but you stop pushing down. You put the new segment right above, and all you need is a good clutch to keep the upper segment fixed while getting friction to the still turning drill. Like in this video.With some ingenuity, you could make the part of the drill that pushes down the drill the same that catches and clutches the new segments. Of course I don't know if you could have enough torque. But in the end it might work in a future if anybody in the world finally decides to develop space worthy reactors.
Quote from: docmordrid on 08/06/2011 02:42 amStick an RTG on it.Even with an ASRG type of RTH you only getting about 110W per generator. It's not enough power. Never mind the shortage of Plutonium 238 isotopes.
Stick an RTG on it.
The issue is all the previous landers shed their heatshields and aeroshells. Dragon can't (or then it isn't a Dragon anymore). Dragon wouldn't put a large payload on Mars, it is going to put a large amount of Dragon structure on Mars. The Dragon structure is going to be a limiting factor.
Yes, there is, it is not that simple just to enlarge the hatch. There are load paths that must be taken into account. Payload bay doors? You got to be joking.Dragon is a pressure vessel.
Yeah, I looked around for some more videos and it looks as if this is inertial stir welding or something like that. Then again I did see a video showing something that was claimed to be FSW that had a red hot, rotating and glowing implement being pushed against the workpiece as it traversed its circumference.
Quote from: Nathan on 08/06/2011 03:24 amThere is no reason that there cannot be a larger hatch on the dragon for this mission. Can have payload bay style doors open out instead, to enable a full volume payload to descend to the surface via deployable ramps. Or no descent to surface but have the payload deployed sideways above the surface (for sampling mission)Dragon derived is probably correct. Minimal modification but certainly modified.Yes, there is, it is not that simple just to enlarge the hatch. There are load paths that must be taken into account. Payload bay doors? You got to be joking.Dragon is a pressure vessel.
There is no reason that there cannot be a larger hatch on the dragon for this mission. Can have payload bay style doors open out instead, to enable a full volume payload to descend to the surface via deployable ramps. Or no descent to surface but have the payload deployed sideways above the surface (for sampling mission)Dragon derived is probably correct. Minimal modification but certainly modified.
Given you are the expert on everything, can you provide an analysis of what would be required in terms of modifications to land a dragon on Mars? Not sure we have nailed the edl problem.
he real solution to deploying a payload to the surface is to open the hatch and deploy from there.
Quote from: mmeijeri on 08/06/2011 04:05 pmYeah, I looked around for some more videos and it looks as if this is inertial stir welding or something like that. Then again I did see a video showing something that was claimed to be FSW that had a red hot, rotating and glowing implement being pushed against the workpiece as it traversed its circumference.Here's another example of stir welding:
What's photoshopped?
Quote from: Jason1701 on 08/07/2011 12:41 amWhat's photoshopped?The SpaceX logo?
isn't photoshop wonderful?