First time posting here,I was reading this post in Space Flight Now (https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/07/14/five-years-after-new-horizons-flyby-scientists-assess-next-mission-to-pluto/) and makes me wonder if a smaller version of a nuclear thermal propulsion rocket (https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/game_changing_development/Nuclear_Thermal_Propulsion_Deep_Space_Exploration) should be considered. What I don't know is how much this rocket could make the journey shorter.
While an NTR engine provides better efficiency, the mass that the system adds to the spacecraft significantly inhibits its performance unless high arrival velocities are reached. With either system, it is obvious that both require a high propellant fraction to enable POI. While this is certainly doable, it is not necessarily ideal as it requires increased system mass and complexity.
the writers of this paper selected the chemically-fueled Butek BHT-600 engine for the Persephone...