I suppose Venus return might actually be harder because of the difficulty getting to the surface, surviving on the surface long enough to get a sample and then getting away from the planet again?
Quote from: Star One on 08/05/2017 08:50 pmI suppose Venus return might actually be harder because of the difficulty getting to the surface, surviving on the surface long enough to get a sample and then getting away from the planet again?Yes, if you want to one-up Mercury sample return, try Venus sample return.But Mercury is hard enough. Even a lander is quite tough - BepiColombo was originally supposed to have a lander, but the costs and the complexity led to its early cancellation.
I'm just engineering student with no practical experience, but I like to speculate about these sort of things.
...assessment would be (back of the envelope using this: https://imgur.com/WGOy3qTVenus:To get your surface sample back from Venus you'd need to land a near full scale, presumably multi stage Earth rocket that can withstand and launch at 700K and almost 100 bar. All the while somehow keeping your LOX at 90 K.. At least your terminal velocity is quite low, which helps the landing but comes back to haunt you on your ascent..An atmospheric sample may be feasible though you'd still need significant dV, the gravity well of Venus is quite deep....
MercuryA Mercury sample return on the other hand just requires an insane dV in the order of 20km/s (from your Earth Escape,) ...For comparison, a Mars sample return would require somewhat over 5km/s from your Earth escape trajectory (how much over mostly depends on the means of landing.) [1]SEP trajectories usually require more dV than traditional chemical trajectories on which most of these numbers are based.