Forums
L2 Sign Up
SLS/Orion
SpaceX
Commercial
ISS
International
Other
Shop
Home
Help
Tags
Calendar
Login
Register
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Advanced Concepts
»
Nuclear spaceship
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: Nuclear spaceship (Read 29729 times)
lkm
Full Member
Posts: 542
Liked: 119
Likes Given: 1
Re: Nuclear spaceship
«
Reply #40 on:
01/27/2012 09:19 pm »
Here's the abstract for the Grooved ring reactor paper from IAC-08.
http://www.iafastro.net/iac/archive/file/IAC-08/abstract/IAC-08.C4.7.-C3.5.6.pdf
Logged
lkm
Full Member
Posts: 542
Liked: 119
Likes Given: 1
Re: Nuclear spaceship
«
Reply #41 on:
02/05/2012 12:03 pm »
I've been reading the Roadmaps and Priorities report and I found it odd that TA01 1.5.5 Nuclear Launch was found non credible by the panel.
1.5.5 was a a Nuclear Combined Cycle engine and listed as a game changing concept and propulsion system in the draft report. Because the panel decided it was non-credible it has the lowest possible QFD score of -38 because the benefit and alignment scores were zeroed out while it still was the most challenging concept imagined.
For comparison RBCC and TBCC scored 150 and in space nuclear thermal scored 274 and if you directly combine their scoring and NBCC is credible then it would score 268 and be a high priority technology.
So the question is, is NBCC credible or not and if so what should it have scored?
Logged
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
All
Go Up
Tags:
Nuclear
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Advanced Concepts
»
Nuclear spaceship
Advertisement
Tweets by NASASpaceflight
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
1