Author Topic: spinlaunch but in LEO  (Read 16212 times)

Offline cAsE-sEnSlTivE

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 8
spinlaunch but in LEO
« on: 10/29/2022 12:30 pm »
I've taken the Spinlaunch concept and put it in LEO which gave it several advantages:

- no friction
- solar powered electric motor can be weak and take its time spinning up the payload
- payload can be connected by carbon fiber tether instead of rigid rod
- payload doesn't have to fly through atmosphere
- because the tether can be very long the g-force acting on the payload is low even at high tangential velocities
-velocity of 1 km/s with a 1 km long tether results in only 1000 g-force acting on the payload  (comparable to the g-force experienced by a smartphone hitting the ground)


Offline rakaydos

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2841
  • Liked: 1875
  • Likes Given: 70

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #2 on: 10/29/2022 02:30 pm »
I've taken the Spinlaunch concept and put it in LEO which gave it several advantages:

- no friction
- solar powered electric motor can be weak and take its time spinning up the payload
- payload can be connected by carbon fiber tether instead of rigid rod
- payload doesn't have to fly through atmosphere
- because the tether can be very long the g-force acting on the payload is low even at high tangential velocities
-velocity of 1 km/s with a 1 km long tether results in only 1000 g-force acting on the payload  (comparable to the g-force experienced by a smartphone hitting the ground)
How are you going spin it up without core being anchored to something that won't move.

Offline DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7024
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 5698
  • Likes Given: 2367
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #3 on: 10/29/2022 03:40 pm »
I've taken the Spinlaunch concept and put it in LEO which gave it several advantages:

Please read
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum#Conservation_of_angular_momentum

Offline cAsE-sEnSlTivE

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #4 on: 10/29/2022 04:23 pm »
I've taken the Spinlaunch concept and put it in LEO which gave it several advantages:

Please read
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum#Conservation_of_angular_momentum
Looks like the motor "stator" would spin up quickly

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8951
  • Lower 48
  • Liked: 60904
  • Likes Given: 1362
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #5 on: 10/29/2022 04:48 pm »
How are you going spin it up without core being anchored to something that won't move.
Use two counter rotating systems on the same axis.
 Not that it helps with other issues that would keep it from being practical.
« Last Edit: 10/29/2022 04:50 pm by Nomadd »
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #6 on: 10/29/2022 07:11 pm »
How are you going spin it up without core being anchored to something that won't move.
Use two counter rotating systems on the same axis.
 Not that it helps with other issues that would keep it from being practical.
Makes more sense. Oneil cylinders were to be built in pairs and joined in parallel then rotated counter clockwise. Which explains physics.

A video would be useful.

Offline octavo

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 249
  • Liked: 186
  • Likes Given: 742
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #7 on: 10/31/2022 06:59 am »
I've taken the Spinlaunch concept and put it in LEO which gave it several advantages:

- no friction
- solar powered electric motor can be weak and take its time spinning up the payload
- payload can be connected by carbon fiber tether instead of rigid rod
- payload doesn't have to fly through atmosphere
- because the tether can be very long the g-force acting on the payload is low even at high tangential velocities
-velocity of 1 km/s with a 1 km long tether results in only 1000 g-force acting on the payload  (comparable to the g-force experienced by a smartphone hitting the ground)

I tried this in KSP and all that happens is your very light motor spins very rapidly and your heavy arms hardly move at all.

Nomad's suggestion of contra-rotating arms might make it worth trying again...

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6836
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 10459
  • Likes Given: 48
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #8 on: 10/31/2022 08:17 am »
If you're putting two tether systems in orbit, instead of tying them together and having one just act as an inert mass, use them as staggered Bolos so both are doing useful work. Or a Bolo and a Rotavator to catch payloads from suborbital trajectories (an in-orbit 'spinlaunch' needs your payload to have already been launched into orbit anyway).

Offline InterestedEngineer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2795
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2132
  • Likes Given: 3503
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #9 on: 11/01/2022 12:08 am »
I've taken the Spinlaunch concept and put it in LEO which gave it several advantages:

- no friction
- solar powered electric motor can be weak and take its time spinning up the payload
- payload can be connected by carbon fiber tether instead of rigid rod
- payload doesn't have to fly through atmosphere
- because the tether can be very long the g-force acting on the payload is low even at high tangential velocities
-velocity of 1 km/s with a 1 km long tether results in only 1000 g-force acting on the payload  (comparable to the g-force experienced by a smartphone hitting the ground)

I tried this in KSP and all that happens is your very light motor spins very rapidly and your heavy arms hardly move at all.

Nomad's suggestion of contra-rotating arms might make it worth trying again...

Rotational momentum wants to be conserved.

Offline InterestedEngineer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2795
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2132
  • Likes Given: 3503
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #10 on: 11/01/2022 05:29 am »
Serious question about all spinlaunch systems:

Has anyone simulated with e.g. FEM the whiplash effect of letting go of an object that is under load?

Or maybe even a closed-form first order solution?

I have yet to see such an analysis in the literature, but maybe I just missed it.

I do know that such moves are a bad idea on e.g. cranes.  No large system under serious strain wants to suddenly have the strain let go, it results in unstable behavior.

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1812
  • Likes Given: 1302
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #11 on: 11/01/2022 07:21 am »
Serious question about all spinlaunch systems:

Has anyone simulated with e.g. FEM the whiplash effect of letting go of an object that is under load?

Or maybe even a closed-form first order solution?

I have yet to see such an analysis in the literature, but maybe I just missed it.

I do know that such moves are a bad idea on e.g. cranes.  No large system under serious strain wants to suddenly have the strain let go, it results in unstable behavior.
Not that much difference from extremely large artillery pieces like railroad guns and the various german mobile seige artillery units in WWII.

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6836
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 10459
  • Likes Given: 48
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #12 on: 11/01/2022 09:02 am »
Serious question about all spinlaunch systems:

Has anyone simulated with e.g. FEM the whiplash effect of letting go of an object that is under load?

Or maybe even a closed-form first order solution?

I have yet to see such an analysis in the literature, but maybe I just missed it.

I do know that such moves are a bad idea on e.g. cranes.  No large system under serious strain wants to suddenly have the strain let go, it results in unstable behavior.
The whiplash effect for large (non-bridge or gantry) cranes is due to the bending of the boom or arm, and is a hazard due to these cranes being balanced over a pivot (such that a recoil will often lead to toppling). A rotary accelerator is a pure tensile load, so at most you have recoil from any energy stored in the tether's stretch which will be in line with the pivot and unable to overbalance the system. In addition, tether material of a high Young's Modulus minimises this, and helpfully materials with a high tensile strength generally also have a high Young's modulus.

Offline cAsE-sEnSlTivE

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #13 on: 11/01/2022 11:08 am »
An alternative but similar concept would be to have two spacecraft with solar electric propulsion connected between themselves with a long tether, and a big xenon depot at the center of the tether (at the center of rotation) to supply the spacecraft with propellant.

Offline InterestedEngineer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2795
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2132
  • Likes Given: 3503
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #14 on: 11/01/2022 03:26 pm »
Serious question about all spinlaunch systems:

Has anyone simulated with e.g. FEM the whiplash effect of letting go of an object that is under load?

Or maybe even a closed-form first order solution?

I have yet to see such an analysis in the literature, but maybe I just missed it.

I do know that such moves are a bad idea on e.g. cranes.  No large system under serious strain wants to suddenly have the strain let go, it results in unstable behavior.
The whiplash effect for large (non-bridge or gantry) cranes is due to the bending of the boom or arm, and is a hazard due to these cranes being balanced over a pivot (such that a recoil will often lead to toppling). A rotary accelerator is a pure tensile load, so at most you have recoil from any energy stored in the tether's stretch which will be in line with the pivot and unable to overbalance the system. In addition, tether material of a high Young's Modulus minimises this, and helpfully materials with a high tensile strength generally also have a high Young's modulus.

Fair enough about the cranes, but if I take a stretchy piece of tubing I use for PT and stretch it and let it go and film it at high speed, it shows oscillations as it contracts.

I'm sure there's a parameter in the differential equations that decides whether a system oscillates or not, but does the high Young's modulus move that parameter enough?   The other parameters will be the load, the length, etc.

That's the paper I'm looking for.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39454
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25567
  • Likes Given: 12232
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #15 on: 11/02/2022 02:38 am »
Doing it in a natural vacuum does make the idea a heck of a lot more viable.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline jee_c2

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 127
  • Budapest, Hungary
  • Liked: 20
  • Likes Given: 45
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #16 on: 11/07/2022 09:28 pm »
Or on the Moon (also vacuum).
I love the idea of seroius kinetic energy transfer applications in space. Not easy, but very rewarding, imo.

Offline colbourne

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
  • Liked: 77
  • Likes Given: 52
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #17 on: 11/11/2022 02:07 am »
It might be worth capturing an asteroid to use as the core. It would otherwise be possible to have two contra rotating arms, but the danger of collision at high speed may make this idea unpopular.

This is basically the Bolo launch method and would work well on the Moon where you would have an orbiting rotating tether and from the Moons surface you could catch the tip of the moving arm (at less than orbital speed )and launch objects into space at greater than orbital speed. All this could be solar powered.

Offline pk67

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • EU
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: spinlaunch but in LEO
« Reply #18 on: 11/11/2022 03:58 am »
Spin capture in LEO would be easier and way more usefull than spinlaunch in LEO i bet. But spinlaunch would also exist in this case as a secondary feature. Refueling or stage exchange in LEO would also help to gain extra performance (delta v) or lower launch mass.

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1