I never understood in the first place why was Skylab orbiting so high...
. Are the orbits chosen by safety, by mission design or the visiting vehicles?
Quote from: apace on 11/23/2011 01:58 pm. Are the orbits chosen by safety, by mission design or the visiting vehicles? yes, yes and yes
[...]Thanks. Can I find somewhere information about the max orbits a visiting vehicle can reach?For Space Shuttle I have: 190 to 960kmFor Soyuz TMA I have: up to 460km
Quote from: apace on 11/23/2011 03:02 pm[...]Thanks. Can I find somewhere information about the max orbits a visiting vehicle can reach?For Space Shuttle I have: 190 to 960kmFor Soyuz TMA I have: up to 460km960 KM? I think that is a wrongly assumed number. It would be a highly elliptical orbit, then - and only in theory. Shuttles usually stayed far under 500 km. The highest orbit a shuttle ever flew was around 575 km when deploying Hubble in its orbit. And that was an elliptical orbit, too.(please correct me if I'm wrong..)
Quote from: Archibald on 11/23/2011 02:16 pmI never understood in the first place why was Skylab orbiting so high... It had no propulsion, so it couldn't reboost.Also, it set up a repeating orbit so that it would pass over the same points on earth every few days
Quote from: Jim on 11/23/2011 02:33 pmQuote from: Archibald on 11/23/2011 02:16 pmI never understood in the first place why was Skylab orbiting so high... It had no propulsion, so it couldn't reboost.Also, it set up a repeating orbit so that it would pass over the same points on earth every few daysDidn't Skylab have TACS ( thruster attitude control system )?http://mix.msfc.nasa.gov/abstracts.php?p=1300Was it out of fuel, not enough fuel left, or never had enough for rebust ?
Skylab was reboosted by the departing Apollo CSM wasn't it?