Forums
L2 Sign Up
SLS/Orion
SpaceX
Commercial
ISS
International
Other
Shop
Home
Help
Tags
Calendar
Login
Register
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Spaceflight Entertainment and Hobbies
»
Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
2247
Likes
Print
Pages:
1
...
68
69
[
70
]
71
72
...
121
Next
Go Down
Author
Topic: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144) (Read 994686 times)
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1380 on:
12/31/2017 09:44 pm »
Hello friends,
the clock is running down slowly, so I would like to thank all of you for the loyalty and continued interest in my work
and wish me and all of us that we stay healthy and have a lot of fun together in the New Year.
«
Last Edit: 12/31/2017 09:45 pm by roma847
»
Logged
Davp99
,
llanitedave
,
the_other_Doug
and
2 others like this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1381 on:
01/02/2018 09:56 pm »
Hello everybody,
let's do it again.
My friend
Joe
was busy again and before uploading to
Shapeways
he had only one question to the height of the AFTC rim,
Source: arcforums.com (crackerjazz)
which was quickly answered, after I had still again measured exactly the height of the small step inside the
Aft Skirt
, which is 1,5 mm. Consequently, the height of the printed disc should be slightly lower, if possible ≤ 1,2 mm.
Now please keep your fingers crossed that Shapeways can realize that as well.
«
Last Edit: 01/02/2018 10:02 pm by roma847
»
Logged
Ronpur50
likes this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1382 on:
01/14/2018 02:51 pm »
Hello everybody,
after a few turbulences in the last time, it can go on now, although after the long holiday break it's not so easy again to fall into the usual tinkering modus.
The 3D model of my friend Joe's
AFTC ring
was almost on the way to the
Shapeways
printers, but what's the name of it?
Things never turn out the way you expect.
And that had once again to do with the selection of reference photos, where one should not be intoxicated only by the details of great Hi-Res photos, because also the respective time window of such photos may not be disregarded, if one wants to build a specific mission.
That's what happened to me with the last photos of the AFTCs, such like this one, which comes from the
STS-121 (2006)
and thus from a rather late mission,
Source: NASA
what inevitably raises the question of whether the
Aft Skirts
of the boosters at the time of
STS-6
have looked similar, or possibly different.
Since I was not able to find any photos that belong to the STS-6 yet, I again searched the Hi-Res archives of
NSF (L2)
and were very surprised when I have come across this great shot in the thread
STS-1: Hi Res Images
.
Source: forum.nasaspaceflight.com (heng44)
The conspicuous thing about it are the silver stripes between the ASTC segments, which immediately have reminded me of the SRB Mock-ups on the KSC grounds,
Source: NASA
but they only have 16 segments, as one can see here.
Source: NASA (KSC/Mapio.net)
However, as you can see on the STS-1 photo, there were four segments between the two
SRB supports
, giving a total of 24 segments, whereas the older Mock-ups had only two, what could be a simplified design with only 16 segments.
Therefore, I assume that the ASTCs in the STS-6 also consisted of 24 segments each, as in the STS-1 two years ago.
At this later photo (2013) of the Mok-ups in front of the entrance to the Atlantis Exhibition Hall on the
KSC Visitor Complex
there should also be 26 segments, which are covered with stripes at the seams.
Source: forum.nasaspaceflight.com (Lee Jay)
But ultimately, what matters is the ASTC configuration that was present at the launch of the Shuttle stack at the mission, therefore for me the image of the STS-1 is crucial for further 3D modeling.
By now I have already instructed my friend Joe, so now he only needs the modified
Stripe width
, which can be determined from the
Segment width
, resulting from the circumference of the AFTC ring (Ø 30 mm) with
C = 30 mm x 3,14 = 94 mm / 24 =
3,9 mm
With this Segment width as the reference value, the STS-1 image results in a width of the stripes of
1 mm
above the seams between the segments in the 3D model.
And so I've changed my previous sketch, which now looks like this.
That agrees well with the resin parts in the
Newware-Space Shuttle Enhancement Kit 1/144 (NW131)
, as one can see from the drawing in the construction manual, wherefore this kit seems to me to be really worthwhile.
So my friend Joe can now customize his 3D model and upload it soon to
Shapeways
.
«
Last Edit: 01/14/2018 03:09 pm by roma847
»
Logged
Ronpur50
and
Starbase101
like this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1383 on:
01/17/2018 10:00 am »
Hello everybody,
by a contribution in the
ARC Forum
meanwhile a few new insights to the
AFTCs
resulted, over which I would like to report briefly.
First of all, there is this photo from an interesting perspective looking at the lower edge of the
SRB-Aft Skirt
, where the individual ASTC segments are also glued over with silver cover strips, as in the
STS-1
photo.
Source: georgesrockets.com
And from the same source also comes this great photo of the
Columbia
, but unfortunately without specifying the mission.
Source: georgesrockets.com
This for me so far unknown source is the website
George's Rocket Pages
of
George Gassaway
, which according to my previous overview I deem for
the
ultimate treasure trove for all shuttle scratch modelers,
if only because of the valuable collection of detailed drawings there, which are coming just in time for the modeling of the
ASTCs
and especially of the
ET-Intertank
,
which is why I have now modified my sketch for the third time, but of course all good things come in threes.
And therefore once more back to this awesome Hi-Res SRB photo from the
STS-121
(2006), where one can even see the cords with which the AFTCs were sewn together. But so far I did not know if these seams still were covered with stripes before the launch as one could see on the already shown
STS-1
photo.
Source: NASA
But on this photo from
Endeavour's
last mission
STS-134
(2011) one can see the same kind of ASTC segments with cords but without stripes.
Source: NASA
And in this sence now to an awesome NASA video,
"Best of the Best" of Shuttle Launches
, that many of you will surely know already.
This video from the
Glenn Research Center
highlights in stunning imagery in slow motion the launches of three Space shuttle missions:
STS-114
,
STS-117
, and
STS-124
.
And there one can see from
6:28
the Aft Skirts with the
ASTCs
, the segments of which have no cover stripes like in this shot at
7:37
.
This video is so overwhelming and unique that one can watch it again and again in full length.
«
Last Edit: 01/18/2018 02:29 pm by roma847
»
Logged
Davp99
,
Ronpur50
and
Starbase101
like this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1384 on:
01/18/2018 12:22 pm »
Hello together,
and from the last photos like this one, my friend Joe was really excited,
Quelle: georgesrockets.com
and has then immediately modified his 3D model and meant that these strips could be applied best by sticking of thin bare metal foil, instead of painting them silver,
Source: arcforums.com (crackerjazz)
which I can well imagine, e.g. by gluing strips from simple aluminum household foil, or even better with self-adhesive aluminum foil, which one can already buy somewhere, right?
In the meantime, I have been able to narrow down the time window of this photo (without a mission number), since four of the lower SRB rings already have the
Instafoam isolation
, wherefore it could be earliest at the
STS -61C
(1986), where this was the case for the first time.
And with this result, it is now certain that the
ASTCs
at the
STS-6
(1983) also had these silver foil insulation strips already.
«
Last Edit: 01/18/2018 04:08 pm by roma847
»
Logged
Starbase101
likes this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
mike robel
Extreme Veteran
Senior Member
Posts: 2304
Merritt Island, FL
Liked: 369
Likes Given: 260
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1385 on:
01/18/2018 12:35 pm »
You can get Bare Metal Foil in various colors and shades which is self-adhesive and provides a nice effect. There is also Aluminum duct tape (used to connect air conditioning/heating ducts) but I find it a bit thick, but it might work well for this application.
Logged
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1386 on:
01/18/2018 04:07 pm »
Thanks Mike,
meanwhile I have tested some materials for the AFTC strips.
Ideal would be adhesive metal foil strips with the thickness like
TAMIYA Masking Tape
, at which I measured 0,03 mm,
which would be comparable to aluminum household foil (0,03 mm), which unfortunately does not stick.
And then I also tested a silver party streamer (0,06 mm), which were table decoration during our last dinner in a restaurant.
But just cutting 1 mm wide strips of this thin stuff is already getting used to,
not to mention the subsequent gluing on the plastic half pipe, for which I first used thin CA.
The left strip is from the party streamer, the two right strips are from the household foil and have about the later required distance of about 4 mm.
And then I was very daring and glued a 4th strip with
MEK
, which surprisingly seems to work too.
This was not totally surprising for me, because I have already made the experience that the
SSWS Pipe Supports
let glue itself with MEK on the paper layer of the MLP deck, whereby the installation of the pipe framework is easier of course, since I only need brushing around the support's floor plates without having to lift them.
«
Last Edit: 01/18/2018 04:55 pm by roma847
»
Logged
Starbase101
likes this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
mike robel
Extreme Veteran
Senior Member
Posts: 2304
Merritt Island, FL
Liked: 369
Likes Given: 260
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1387 on:
01/18/2018 04:20 pm »
Manfred,
You use watered-down white glue to apply household aluminum foil (or you can get MicroScale Micro metal foil adhesive which is mostly the same thing). You brush it on, let it dry till in clears (but it is still sticky) and then put it on. You can smooth it out with a toothpick or a hard brush, buff it with a sanding stick, and it takes a sealing coat well.
Logged
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1388 on:
01/18/2018 08:27 pm »
Thanks Mike,
this seems to be a cool trick.
Logged
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1389 on:
01/19/2018 11:09 pm »
Hello everybody,
and so once more back to the photo of the
Columbia
with the AFTC silver strips in the collection of
George Gassaway
(without mission number), which after intensive research I can assign meanwhile, which is always important to me, and here with the right source.
Source: spacefacts.de
After I firstly have scoured through the
NASA Media Archive
and then the website of
Capcomespace
in the 3rd attempt at
Spacefacts
, I finally have found out that it deals with the
STS-50
(1992).
And through this search, I now know that these
silver foil insulation strips
on the
AFTCs
were used at least until
STS-85
(1997) and disappeared only later.
Source: spacefacts.de
On this photo of the
STS-89
(1998) one can recognize even at Hi-Res. no more silver strips with security,
I imagine at least with my meanwhile trained silver-strip-eye.
Source: mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov
On the other hand, I think that in this photo of the
STS-99
(2000), one can easily see at Hi-Res. that there were no silver strips, what then also remained until the end of the Space Shuttle program with
STS-135
(2011).
Source: mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov
From the intervening seven missions
STS-90, STS-91, STS-95, STS-88, STS-96, STS-93
and
STS-103
I could not find any reliable photos unfortunately until now, whereby one should not be wondered about the unsystematic numbering of the missions.
If any of you find usable photos of it, please let me know.
Now that's enough of the long AFTC searches, i.e. one photo I still want to show finally, namely this one here,
Source: Library of Congress (HAER No. TX-116-K-21)
with an interesting view at the inside of this ring-shaped hollow flexible flame curtain
(George Gassaway)
, and here once more a larger view.
«
Last Edit: 01/19/2018 11:12 pm by roma847
»
Logged
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1390 on:
01/19/2018 11:35 pm »
Hello friends,
from
Shapeways
came the news that the wall of the doughnut shape is a bit too thin, so my friend Joe has changed it to 0.5 mm.
And these are now the final dimensions with which he wants to upload his 3D model tonight.
Source: arcforums.com (crackerjazz)
Then we'll see.
«
Last Edit: 01/19/2018 11:38 pm by roma847
»
Logged
Starbase101
,
Davp99
and
Ronpur50
like this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1391 on:
01/20/2018 01:47 pm »
Hello everybody,
my friend Joe has uploaded his 3D model to
Shapeways
, and of course I could not resist and have immediately ordered a pair of them.
Source: shapeways.com (Crackerjazz)
Now I can't wait to hold it in my hands and to have a close look at them.
Hopefully, Shapeways will soon greenlight it.
Logged
Ronpur50
likes this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1392 on:
01/23/2018 10:34 pm »
Hello everybody,
a friend of our
Raumcon-Forum
has sent me a small roll of silver adhesive foil for testing.
The foil is so thin that one can hardly measure its thickness (about 0.03 mm), and was of course tried the same time, for which I have cut small 1 mm wide strips with a brand-new cutter knife.
which I then glued tentatively onto an
Airfix Aft Skirt-Ring
, which seems to be a practicable solution.
Then I also glued three of these foil strips on the half pipe (right).
And finally respectively 24 strips must be glued onto the 3D printed and painted
ASTC Rings
, which might be a bit of fiddling, but should be feasible.
Logged
Ronpur50
and
Starbase101
like this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1393 on:
01/25/2018 01:14 pm »
Hello together,
well, I was rather amazed when I suddenly saw at noon today that the adhesive film strips had detached again from the rounding of the half pipe.
Apparently, the adhesive film has certain residual stresses inside, which exceed the adhesive force of the strip after a certain time and lead to detachment.
This can be seen on this piece of adhesive foil, which bulges itself to the silver side after cutting from the roll.
A similar effect I noticed every now and then on some of the glued strip ends, which did not glue firmly enough and stood out a bit (≤ 1 mm), which I then again had to glue with
MEK
, and a very unruly end with
CA
.
The household foil does not have these internal stresses, which is why their strips are still firmly fixed, furthermore they were glued with MEK respectively CA.
However, I have to say in hindsight that I had not degreased the half pipe before gluing the adhesive foil strips, which could be the reason, what I will check again tomorrow.
Then I had also ordered a
Chrome marker
(1 mm) at
Rai-Ro
, which arrived today, which of course I tried out right away.
Around these markers of
Molotow
a real hype has arisen, whose highly pigmented special ink creates a real mirror effect on smooth, non-absorbent surfaces.
At first, however, I could not cope with the marker because I did not know that it was a
Pumpmarker
, which had to be shaken and briefly pumped before use.
While straight lines drawn with ruler are not a problem, using the marker on the half tube was a bit more difficult and definitely needs getting used to, which certainly requires some practice.
Therefore, the first six strips on the right end are certainly not optimal, but at least a ray of hope.
So much for the insights from my experiments today.
«
Last Edit: 01/25/2018 01:26 pm by roma847
»
Logged
Starbase101
likes this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
mike robel
Extreme Veteran
Senior Member
Posts: 2304
Merritt Island, FL
Liked: 369
Likes Given: 260
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1394 on:
01/25/2018 01:30 pm »
I recommend you get a piece of glass and make sure it is clean. Place the tape to be cut onto the glass, then cut it as desired.
As you noted, clean the surface of the place to stick the tape, place the tape, then use a toothpick or another tool (Bare Metal Foil makes a such tool, but you find similar things in craft stores), burnish it down. If the edges rise up, you can dab a piece of the aforementioned white glue mixture underneath and reattach it.
When finished, you can spray it with clear paint to seal it down or apply a touch of an acrylic like floor polish like "Future". It has changed names many times and it varies by country.
Hope this helps.
Logged
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1395 on:
01/25/2018 09:10 pm »
Thanks Mike, these are all good advices, which I have partly heeded.
Hello friends,
I have also still tried something else.
At first, I degreased the half-tube with
Isopropyl
and then glued three new adhesive foil strips.
In order to check a possible diameter influence, I also put a strip on my thick
Rainbird
knitting needle (Ø 8 mm), and lo and behold, there it still glues always firmly, without any signs of detachment, which seems to confirm my guess.
On the other hand, on the thinner half-tube (Ø 4,7 mm) after a short while the ends began detaching again,
what can be prevented however by fixing the ends with
CA
.
Then I've made another attempt with the
Chrome marker
, for which I taped a 1 mm wide strip on the half-tube on both sides with tape (2 mm) and then painted this area by using the chrome marker simply by hand. But after removing the tape strips one can see that the chrome line is still not even, because the liquid partially creeps ugly under the tape.
Besides, this procedure would be pure stress at 24 strips per
Aft Skirt ring
,
except from the fact that the marked strips probably would not have the same width at the end anyway.
Incidentally, a warming of the adhesive foil strips brought no positive effect too.
But now we will wait for the delivery of the
3D-ASTC prints
, which I have now also ordered in
Frosted Extreme Detail (FED)
.
Logged
Starbase101
likes this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
leeg
Member
Posts: 12
Tenessee
Liked: 6
Likes Given: 0
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1396 on:
01/28/2018 04:24 pm »
May want to try Bare-Metal, it is adhesive metal used for highlighting the chrome around car windows. I have used it for the same purpose you are and it worked quite well.
Mfg.: Bare-Metal Foil Company, PO Box #82, Farmington, Mi 48024
https://www.bare-metal.com
Logged
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1397 on:
01/29/2018 06:29 am »
Yep,
Bare-Metal Foil
should be working well, as I've also heard it from other guys in
ARC Forums
, but there are different
Chrome Foils
, e.g.
Bare-Metal Foil - Ultrabright Chrome
and more recently also
Bare-Metal Foil - New Improved Chrome
, whereas this foil would be a little thinner.
At first, I wanted to decide for the
Ultrabright Chrome
, but then they discouraged me from this kind and recommended the
New Improved Chrome
, which would actually be thinner and, as a result, better cling to fine contours and details and stick more tightly.
That's why I have ordered this chrome foil now and will test it for making the
ASTC stripes
.
What kind of Bare Metal Foil did you process and how could it be cut?
«
Last Edit: 01/29/2018 06:41 am by roma847
»
Logged
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1398 on:
02/01/2018 09:31 pm »
Hello everybody,
today I've received the Bare-Metal Foil, and so I can test it.
But at first glance, the foil does not look as mirror-like as aluminum household foil.
Here you can see my comparison test,
from left to right:
Aluminum household foil - Bare-metal foil (New Improved Chrome) - Silver party streamer.
BTW, I had smoothed the Bare-metal foil strip several times with a Q-tip in the hope that it would shine more, but unfortunately without a significant effect.
And here in comparison with the party streamer and the silver foil of my Raumcon friend on top of the Bare-Metal foil, which looks relatively matt gloss,
which is not mirror-like for my taste, although the lighting always plays an important role.
Logged
Starbase101
likes this
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
roma847
Senior Member
Posts: 2327
Be part of it
Germany
Liked: 2191
Likes Given: 55
Re: Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
«
Reply #1399 on:
02/04/2018 05:15 pm »
Hello everybody,
the last few days there was still a nice surprise, because the featherweight package of
Shapeways
with the
AFTCs
has arrived,
and was very carefully unpacked, after all, it's my first, but certainly not my last.
The Thanksgiving card made me even more curious.
At the first glance, everything was packed very well.
At first I was surprised by the number of bags , especially since I had ordered both versions,
FUD
and
FXD
, so four rings.
But now it's time for dinner,
see you later, and stay curious my friends ...
Logged
***************
Regards from Germany
Manfred
Under construction:
1:144 Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6
Print
Pages:
1
...
68
69
[
70
]
71
72
...
121
Next
Go Up
Tags:
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Spaceflight Entertainment and Hobbies
»
Space Shuttle Launch Pad 39A with Challenger STS-6 (1:144)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Tweets by NASASpaceflight
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
0