Author Topic: LIVE: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - Dec 11, 2012  (Read 190893 times)

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38024
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22409
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #40 on: 11/09/2012 10:15 pm »
A policy that as we saw with the recent GPS launch seems to be highly sensible. It must be the case that all such launches have similar performance margins? 

It is not a policy but just a happenstance.  X-37 can't fly on any other vehicle.  Read the GPS thread.  GPS can't fly on a plain Medium DIV and when it flies on M+ (4,2)
« Last Edit: 11/10/2012 04:05 am by Jim »

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14385
  • UK
  • Liked: 4137
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #41 on: 11/09/2012 10:20 pm »
A policy that as we saw with the recent GPS launch seems to be highly sensible. It must be the case that all such launches have similar performance margins? 

It is not a policy but just a happenstance.

So a performance margin isn't a factor here then when it comes to picking a launcher for a particular military payload?

Offline hoku

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 811
  • Liked: 702
  • Likes Given: 343
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #42 on: 11/09/2012 10:39 pm »
Not to sound Snarky, but the X-37 at one point was baselined to fly on the Delta II, so I wonder if flying on a larger Atlas-401 provides it with enough margin to overcome a similar issue.

Fingers crossed they find a root cause, and resume operations soon.
I seem to remember that X-37B should have launched on the Delta II w/o a protective shroud, but cross-wind analysis deduced a too high risk during launch for this configuration. This at least seems to be the official narrative providing a plausible explanation for moving X-37B from Delta II to Atlas V.

The fact that the Air Force had contracted a certain number of Atlas V launch vehicles, and thus had to put them to use might also have contributed to this decision. Launching the X-37B definitely ain't "cheap" (unless someone else has already paid for your launch vehicle).
« Last Edit: 11/09/2012 10:42 pm by hoku »

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38024
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22409
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #43 on: 11/10/2012 12:18 am »
A policy that as we saw with the recent GPS launch seems to be highly sensible. It must be the case that all such launches have similar performance margins? 

It is not a policy but just a happenstance.

So a performance margin isn't a factor here then when it comes to picking a launcher for a particular military payload?

Not an excessive one like GPS had.  All that is required is a positive margin

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14385
  • UK
  • Liked: 4137
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #44 on: 11/10/2012 02:30 pm »
A policy that as we saw with the recent GPS launch seems to be highly sensible. It must be the case that all such launches have similar performance margins? 

It is not a policy but just a happenstance.

So a performance margin isn't a factor here then when it comes to picking a launcher for a particular military payload?

Not an excessive one like GPS had.  All that is required is a positive margin

Thanks for that insight. Why did the GPS end up on the Delta if there is no need for such an excess in performance as I would have thought the Delta would have been the more expensive option to launch it on?

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #45 on: 11/20/2012 03:52 pm »
any updates on the schedule?
2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Online Galactic Penguin SST

Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET December 11, 2012
« Reply #46 on: 11/21/2012 10:43 am »
any updates on the schedule?


It was actually known on L2 about 10 days ago that a new launch date in early December was set, but it seems this was dropped too, as ULA's site was finally updated today with a launch date of NET December 11: http://www.ulalaunch.com/site/pages/Launch.shtml#/33/

Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Online jacqmans

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21930
  • Houten, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 8876
  • Likes Given: 325
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #47 on: 11/21/2012 01:56 pm »
Latest news is (from L2) that there is no launch date anymore.......
Jacques :-)

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7217
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 818
  • Likes Given: 914
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #48 on: 11/21/2012 03:38 pm »
Latest news is (from L2) that there is no launch date anymore.......

Is this due to problems with schedule conflicts, the launch vehicle or payload?
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15563
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8923
  • Likes Given: 1400
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #49 on: 11/21/2012 04:03 pm »
Latest news is (from L2) that there is no launch date anymore.......

Is this due to problems with schedule conflicts, the launch vehicle or payload?

I believe that it is due to the RL10 failure investigation.

 - Ed Kyle

Offline Chris Bergin

Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET Dec. 11, 2012
« Reply #50 on: 11/21/2012 04:17 pm »
ULA:
The new OTV-3 planning date for launch is Dec. 11 pending approval from the range.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8643
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3823
  • Likes Given: 803
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #51 on: 11/21/2012 06:50 pm »
I believe that it is due to the RL10 failure investigation.

Your definitions of failure are getting more and more interesting, Ed.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14385
  • UK
  • Liked: 4137
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET Dec. 11, 2012
« Reply #52 on: 11/21/2012 08:41 pm »
Lengthy article on Space.com about the delay, also including details of a statement from the Union of Concerned Scientists about the whole X-37B concept.

http://www.space.com/18592-secretive-x37b-space-plane-delay.html

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15563
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8923
  • Likes Given: 1400
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET November 27, 2012
« Reply #53 on: 11/22/2012 02:35 am »
I believe that it is due to the RL10 failure investigation.

Your definitions of failure are getting more and more interesting, Ed.

RL10B-2 suffered some type of failure during the GPS 2F-3 mission that resulted in low thrust and extended burn times.  A propellant leak is one possible explanation, among others.  The Delta IV managed to score a success only due to substantial margin on the mission, but the engine or some part of the propulsion system failed to do its job as designed.  That's why ULA, NASA, the Air Force, etc., are performing an investigation right now, why ULA is grounded right now, etc.. 

 - Ed Kyle

Offline steveb23

  • Member
  • Posts: 16
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET Dec. 11, 2012
« Reply #54 on: 12/04/2012 04:30 pm »
Hi,

Is there any update on this launch date? Travelling to Florida next week so wondering if I can watch it...

Steve

Offline robertross

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17940
  • Westphal, Nova Scotia
  • Liked: 661
  • Likes Given: 7832
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET Dec. 11, 2012
« Reply #55 on: 12/04/2012 04:48 pm »
Hi,

Is there any update on this launch date? Travelling to Florida next week so wondering if I can watch it...

Steve

Looks like no range approval as yet...

Offline WHAP

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
  • Liked: 105
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET Dec. 11, 2012
« Reply #56 on: 12/04/2012 09:35 pm »
Hi,

Is there any update on this launch date? Travelling to Florida next week so wondering if I can watch it...

Steve

Don't give up just yet...
ULA employee.  My opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.

Offline Targeteer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6969
  • near hangar 18
  • Liked: 4435
  • Likes Given: 1464
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET Dec. 11, 2012
« Reply #57 on: 12/05/2012 12:41 am »
Since there are dates waiting for range approval, does that mean a root cause on the low thrust has been determined?  Have the details been released?  Because an accident board was convened, they probably will/should be.
Best quote heard during an inspection, "I was unaware that I was the only one who was aware."

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8874
  • Liked: 4830
  • Likes Given: 768
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET Dec. 11, 2012
« Reply #58 on: 12/05/2012 08:50 pm »
Range Approval for date 11 December 2012 appears to have gone through as Launch is no longer listed as pending approval on ULA website.

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: Atlas V 501 - X-37B OTV-3 - NET Dec. 11, 2012
« Reply #59 on: 12/06/2012 01:40 am »
Range Approval for date 11 December 2012 appears to have gone through as Launch is no longer listed as pending approval on ULA website.

I hope to see better confirmation thurs.

2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1