Author Topic: Blue Origin's BE-7 engine  (Read 98350 times)

Offline AS-503

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 513
  • Orion Fab Team
  • Colorado USA
  • Liked: 350
  • Likes Given: 261
Re: Blue Origin's BE-7 engine
« Reply #120 on: 06/02/2023 02:43 am »
Agree with meekGee.
The F1 had a traditional gimbal on the top of the thrust chamber.
Another clue is that the photos clearly show the struts that are actuated by the hydraulic ram are connected to the thrust chamber NOT the nozzle.
It it was a nozzle gimbaled design the struts would be on the nozzle.

Offline sevenperforce

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
  • Liked: 969
  • Likes Given: 599
Re: Blue Origin's BE-7 engine
« Reply #121 on: 06/02/2023 03:51 am »
I feel like the load paths for a virtual gimbal about the nozzle throat would be hella challenging. You're talking about truly immense forces and the natural geometry of the engine already directs those forces up the nozzle and into the combustion chamber axially. Trying to transfer a load into gimbals mounted anywhere other than the chamber...yikes.

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6862
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 10485
  • Likes Given: 48
Re: Blue Origin's BE-7 engine
« Reply #122 on: 06/02/2023 09:49 am »
The disadvantage of course is that the throat now has to have the ability to flex.
The diagram is misleading: there is no flex at the throat, the engine gimbals about an axis within the throat, but that just means the powerhead swings about the pivot in the opposite direction to the nozzle. The main impact of this is clearance within the engine bay, and that instead of one propellant feed line translating and rotating and one just rotating (assuming it is routed through a topend gimbal) both feed lines translate and rotate. This is not uncommon for vernier engines (e.g. Atlas, Thor, Soyuz).

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56304
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 92793
  • Likes Given: 43283
Re: Blue Origin's BE-7 engine
« Reply #123 on: 06/20/2024 02:00 pm »
https://twitter.com/blueorigin/status/1803789703004430524

Quote
Here’s a BE-7 engine headed into vacuum cell testing in a simulated space-like environment at Air Force Research Laboratory, Edwards Air Force Base, CA. BE-7 generates 10,000 lbf of thrust and powers our Blue Moon MK1 and MK2 lunar landers.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56304
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 92793
  • Likes Given: 43283
Re: Blue Origin's BE-7 engine
« Reply #124 on: 08/20/2024 04:02 pm »
https://twitter.com/blueorigin/status/1825925995892797800

Quote
BE-7 engines power our Blue Moon MK1 and MK2 lunar landers. Grateful to partner with @AFResearchLab at Edwards Air Force Base, CA, where we conduct BE-7 testing in a vacuum cell to simulate a space-like environment. Here’s the team after a successful full-duration test that included ignition.

Offline Robert_the_Doll

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1096
  • Florida
  • Liked: 2000
  • Likes Given: 520
Re: Blue Origin's BE-7 engine
« Reply #125 on: 08/20/2024 05:33 pm »
https://twitter.com/davill/status/1825944824551555290
Quote
Here’s another view of a BE-7 in testing. Great to see the team’s progress at Edwards. BE-7 has a novel high-performing dual-flow closed expander cycle. MK1 has one BE-7 engine, and our larger MK2 crewed lander, part of the Artemis effort, is powered by three BE-7s.
« Last Edit: 08/20/2024 05:56 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Tags: be-7 Blue Origin 
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1