Quote from: M.LeBel on 08/21/2016 04:33 pm "Thrust without exhaust is of course impossible." OK, when you fall under gravity, you do not expel any exhaust!Right? This is because the falling object is in a time rate differential i.e. the rate of time slows down toward Earth.This is a logical causal structure. This is what drives gravity, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics etc. Things tend to exist more (and be found) where the rate of time (1/T) is slower. The York Time is in fact a description not of spacetime contraction/expansion but an indication of the structure of the rate of time; slower in front (pull) and faster at the back (push) giving you motion and direction.I don't know if this help but this is what everybody is trying to achieve .. in simple terms.Marcel,What I can tell you is there is a red shift of the internal EmDrive EM waves as they transfer momentum to the accelerating EmDrive. So momentum is conserved.

"Thrust without exhaust is of course impossible." OK, when you fall under gravity, you do not expel any exhaust!Right? This is because the falling object is in a time rate differential i.e. the rate of time slows down toward Earth.This is a logical causal structure. This is what drives gravity, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics etc. Things tend to exist more (and be found) where the rate of time (1/T) is slower. The York Time is in fact a description not of spacetime contraction/expansion but an indication of the structure of the rate of time; slower in front (pull) and faster at the back (push) giving you motion and direction.I don't know if this help but this is what everybody is trying to achieve .. in simple terms.Marcel,

O.K. I ear you. Conservation laws follow logic as the “no magic” rule. Stuff just don’t disappear...A red shift is observed in EM waves leaving a gravitational source i.e. moving from slower time rate toward a faster time rate. The red shift you talk about would indicate that there is such a time rate differential present in the device. In theory, it should be faster time rate at the back and slower time rate at the front similar (same) to the York time structure in White’s bubble simulation graphics.So, a device that can red shift a wave using that same wave (energy of system is in the wave) and special configuration means what? Is this the converse of the gravitational red shift? Is forcing the red shift of an EM wave using a special configuration causing a (required) time rate differential ? Marcel,

Dustinthewind: Yes. I think the cavity accelerate the vacuum, which to me, is the explosive like time process. But, I would not discount the effect on quantum fluctuations. I think these fluctuations could be separated and “pumped” in opposite directions where they coalesce to form the time rate gradient?Thanks for the Ostoma reference....Meberbs: We may understand time dilation (a time duration) as the integration of a dynamic process. Would this integration be possible without its first derivative, a time rate, suggested here as 1/T? ...and yes. Momentum is conserved. ....”Things accelerating without bound”: I guess so. In a G field, we always end up hitting the source (Earth). But if the source of the field is moving with you ....?RERT: Right! Small time rate differential ..Big motion! Part of the answer to the trillion dollars question is about understanding what you are really doing. We have to think not “time dilation” or time duration but rather one derivative below, the rate of time. I believe a logically operational system, as the universe appears to be, requires that there be only one type of stuff out there. This is an explosive like process that we call time. In other words, make time a stuff of substance and work with that. I have work on this “different perspective” and wrote a paper (attached). Read it all. This is not the maths, but it is the thinking.Marcel,

...the objective would be to have asymmetrical power fluctuations within the copper frustum. Absorption, emission and dissipation. Dissipative process are not conservative and the copper is not a perfect conductor. There is dissipation involved and the asymmetry of the frustum may be allowing this to create thrust. Modeling this is not as easy though, because you would be modeling the kinetic energy of the copper atoms, not the MW field inside the frustum.

"What we're doing is the extreme case of nonlinear optics, where the light and matter are coupled so strongly that we don't have light and matter anymore. We have something in between, called a polariton.""What we depend on is the vacuum fluctuation. Vacuum, in a classical sense, is an empty space. There's nothing. But in a quantum sense, a vacuum is full of fluctuating photons, having so-called zero-point energy. These vacuum photons are actually what we are using to resonantly excite electrons in our cavity." ~http://phys.org/news/2016-08-merge-quantum-coupling.html

But in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version.

QuoteBut in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version. http://etheric.com/nassikas-thruster-II/---------------------------------------------A million times thrust with no energy spent?

QuoteBut in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version. http://etheric.com/nassikas-thruster-II/---------------------------------------------A million times thrust with no energy spent? All I'll say is extraordinary claims require extraordinary data.Sorry guys and gals I've been very busy as of late but I haven't forgot anyone here and try to catch up when I can. Testing goes on and the anomaly still remains anonymous. A forced pulsed jerked dual mode of operation is providing some interesting clues. Much more later. My Very Best,Shell

Quote from: SeeShells on 08/23/2016 05:51 pmQuoteBut in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version. http://etheric.com/nassikas-thruster-II/---------------------------------------------A million times thrust with no energy spent? All I'll say is extraordinary claims require extraordinary data.Sorry guys and gals I've been very busy as of late but I haven't forgot anyone here and try to catch up when I can. Testing goes on and the anomaly still remains anonymous. A forced pulsed jerked dual mode of operation is providing some interesting clues. Much more later. My Very Best,ShellDoes anyone know where to get the superconducting nozzle Dr. Nassikas uses? I purchased a high flux magnet with the idea of eventually testing this thruster.

For Anyone re the above question....Hypothetical: two frustums +/- the same size and volume etc. one with flat end plates the other with spherical. By what % (+/-) does the "Q" increase in the spherical frustum over the flat endplate frustum? Thanks anyone, FL