Author Topic: How would Russia go to the moon?  (Read 143842 times)

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9593
  • Liked: 353
  • Likes Given: 462
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #400 on: 02/20/2016 12:17 AM »
Overview of robotic lunar and Mars plans:

http://www.marsdaily.com/reports/Russia_plans_return_to_Mars_Moon_despite_money_woes_999.html



"scientists have new hope of again sending missions to the Moon and to Mars."

It's those Russian scientists again, always right around the corner from sending people to Mars.
« Last Edit: 02/20/2016 12:18 AM by Danderman »

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5155
  • Liked: 979
  • Likes Given: 345
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #401 on: 03/20/2016 05:56 PM »
So it appears with the recent news of 30% cut to the Roscosmos budget the answer to the original title of this thread becomes "With a functioning economy"
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Online Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11053
  • Liked: 2506
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #402 on: 03/29/2016 01:40 PM »
This presentation from Friday is mostly about planetary protection. But it includes a slide about the Russian robotic lunar program.

Offline josespeck

  • Member
  • Posts: 37
  • Liked: 6
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #403 on: 12/19/2017 03:24 PM »
I thought this proposal was pretty good. Only two 40 t launches. Their lander seems pretty light. Only 11.5 t compared to 15 t for the Apollo LM.

http://en.spacelin.ru/moon-seven/presentation/
40 tones is a "right value" of LEO payload for Dual Launch Architecture. Considering that original Angara A5V proposal started from 35 tones of payload, then it had been increased to 37-38 tones, I would not be surprised if LV eventually would "grow" and reach 40 tones.

Spacelin has been purchased by Galaktika.
Alia Prokofieva, owner and president of Galaxy Group of Companies.
Quote
...we abandoned the fuel delivery system to the engine, choosing instead an electric pump...
our New Zealand colleagues from RocketLab not so long ago tested their carrier rocket Electron, equipped with electric pumps, thereby proving the operability of this solution.
...during the development it became obvious that the available batteries for electric pumps are too heavy.

Anyone can mount rockets with electric pumps without paying patents to Rocketlab?.
« Last Edit: 12/19/2017 03:27 PM by josespeck »

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5157
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 4142
  • Likes Given: 1219
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #404 on: 12/25/2017 05:33 PM »


Quote
Луноход: возвращение

Published on 25 Dec 2017
  Земляне планируют вернуться на Луну. Возможно, Роскосмос и НАСА, используя опыт Аполлонов и автоматических Луноходов, будут работать совместно.

Google translate:

Quote
Lunokhod: Return

Earthlings plan to return to the moon. Perhaps Roskosmos and NASA, using the experience of the Apollo and the automatic Lunokhods, will work together.
« Last Edit: 12/25/2017 05:36 PM by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14193
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 3564
  • Likes Given: 533
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #405 on: 12/26/2017 07:24 PM »
Some screen grabs. Looks like the large lander also performs LOI with Federatsiya, like in Constellation. Obligatory Lunar base included! Looks like the artist just copied the ISS configuration for a new space station.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline fregate

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 885
  • Space Association of Australia
  • Melbourne Australia
  • Liked: 113
  • Likes Given: 10
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #406 on: 01/28/2018 07:38 AM »
Some screen grabs. Looks like the large lander also performs LOI with Federatsiya, like in Constellation. Obligatory Lunar base included! Looks like the artist just copied the ISS configuration for a new space station.
Steven, those are fantasies from animation company that were made for a Roscosmos documentary.
"The real McCoy" are below (slides from Chief Designer of RKK Energia Evgeniy Mikrin presentation on Annual Korolev Readings on 23th of January 2018)
« Last Edit: 01/28/2018 07:58 AM by fregate »
"Selene, the Moon. Selenginsk, an old town in Siberia: moon-rocket  town" Vladimir Nabokov

Offline fregate

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 885
  • Space Association of Australia
  • Melbourne Australia
  • Liked: 113
  • Likes Given: 10
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #407 on: 01/28/2018 07:45 AM »
A title slide of my presentation for February meeting of the Space Association of Australia. 
Stay tuned :)
« Last Edit: 01/28/2018 08:00 AM by fregate »
"Selene, the Moon. Selenginsk, an old town in Siberia: moon-rocket  town" Vladimir Nabokov

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14193
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 3564
  • Likes Given: 533
Re: How would Russia go to the moon?
« Reply #408 on: 01/29/2018 04:16 AM »
Looking at the schedule. Not sure what the difference is between BP and PP. STK has three cores and STK1 has six cores. Soyuz-5, STK and STK1 LEO payloads are 17, 50 and 88 t, respectively. Federatsiya LEO is 14.4 t, Federatsiya Lunar is 20 t and LVPK Lunar lander is 27 t.

2022 Soyuz-5 BP1 (Federatsiya LEO test flight)
2023 Soyuz-5 BP2 (Federatsiya to ISS)
2024 Soyuz-5 PP1 (Federatsiya to ISS)
2027 STK BP3 (Federatsiya to DSG)
2027 STK PP2 (Federatsiya to DSG)
2028 STK1 BP (LVPK to LEO)
2028 STK1 BP4 (Federatsiya to Lunar orbit)
2029 STK1 BP (LVPK to Lunar orbit)
2029 STK1 PP3 (Federatsiya to Lunar orbit)
2030 STK1 BP (LVPK to Lunar orbit, first crewed landing)
2030 STK1 PP4 (Federatsiya to Lunar orbit)
« Last Edit: 01/29/2018 04:18 AM by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Tags: