Author Topic: Rokot/Briz-KM - 3xRodnik - Plesetsk - Sept. 23, 2015 (22:00 UTC)  (Read 26920 times)

Offline input~2

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6839
  • Liked: 1569
  • Likes Given: 566
I propose we wait a little more to see if a 5th Object  is catalogued by USSTRATCOM before concluding on the number of S/C onboard this launch.
For the time being we have 3 Rodniks (Object A, B and C) and Briz-KM (Object D)
In the 3 previous cases, Object E took longer to be catalogued...

Offline Galactic Penguin SST

According to anik the exact liftoff time was at 21:59:38 UTC.
Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Offline Stan Black

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3132
  • Liked: 377
  • Likes Given: 230
Anik is showing Briz-KM №72512. It was originally to carry 14Ф31 Geo-IK-2 №11 Kosmos-2470 but was swapped before that launch?
« Last Edit: 09/24/2015 05:23 pm by Stan Black »

Offline Skyrocket

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2679
  • Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Liked: 1038
  • Likes Given: 200
Anik is showing Briz-KM №72512. It was originally to carry 14Ф31 Geo-IK-2 №11 Kosmos-2470 but was swapped before that launch?
Interestingly, it apparently also used the different payload fairing type, which was only used for the Geo-IK-2 before.

Offline Nicolas PILLET

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2484
  • Gien, France
    • Kosmonavtika
  • Liked: 711
  • Likes Given: 158
Interestingly, it apparently also used the different payload fairing type, which was only used for the Geo-IK-2 before.

Really ? I've compared with pictures from past launches, they all look the same to me...
Nicolas PILLET
Kosmonavtika : The French site on Russian Space

Offline Skyrocket

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2679
  • Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Liked: 1038
  • Likes Given: 200
Interestingly, it apparently also used the different payload fairing type, which was only used for the Geo-IK-2 before.

Really ? I've compared with pictures from past launches, they all look the same to me...

See following attached images. The Geo-IK2 launch has a different shape. Yesterdays launch appears to have the same shape.

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8980
  • Liked: 4913
  • Likes Given: 768
Interestingly, it apparently also used the different payload fairing type, which was only used for the Geo-IK-2 before.

Really ? I've compared with pictures from past launches, they all look the same to me...

See following attached images. The Geo-IK2 launch has a different shape. Yesterdays launch appears to have the same shape.
it appears to match design of the Angara A1.1 variant and was designed to be more lightweight and eventually replace Rockot fairing.

Offline satwatcher

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 138
  • Liked: 101
  • Likes Given: 100
The first set of JSpOC elements for the CZ-11 launch have been published. The first object has ID 40925. At present 4 objects are assigned to the Rokot launch with IDs 40920, 40921, 40922, 40923. This leaves ID 40924 unassigned, suggesting JSpOC expects a 5th object from the Rokot launch.

Offline anik

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7776
  • Liked: 956
  • Likes Given: 366
There is nothing to expect.

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13512
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 9048
  • Likes Given: 90157
I propose we wait a little more to see if a 5th Object  is catalogued by USSTRATCOM before concluding on the number of S/C onboard this launch.
For the time being we have 3 Rodniks (Object A, B and C) and Briz-KM (Object D)
In the 3 previous cases, Object E took longer to be catalogued...

The first set of JSpOC elements for the CZ-11 launch have been published. The first object has ID 40925. At present 4 objects are assigned to the Rokot launch with IDs 40920, 40921, 40922, 40923. This leaves ID 40924 unassigned, suggesting JSpOC expects a 5th object from the Rokot launch.

There is nothing to expect.

Does the absence of evidence (there has been no announcement of detection of a 5th object from this launch) mean evidence of absence (there is no 5th object/4th satellite)?

Further thinking aloud:
If there is no Kosmos 2491/2499/2504-type satellite aboard this launch, and DOSAAF-85 was not launched, then did they just use ballast?

Or could a 4th satellite have been launched, but failed and remained attached, inert, to the Briz upper stage?

Zubenelgenubi
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Phillip Clark

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
  • Hastings, England
  • Liked: 560
  • Likes Given: 1078
The first set of JSpOC elements for the CZ-11 launch have been published. The first object has ID 40925. At present 4 objects are assigned to the Rokot launch with IDs 40920, 40921, 40922, 40923. This leaves ID 40924 unassigned, suggesting JSpOC expects a 5th object from the Rokot launch.

In the past gaps have been left in the numbering system when objects are expected to be catalogued but there is no promise that such objects exist.
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane - WJ.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0