Author Topic: Kanopus-ST - Soyuz-2.1v/Volga - Plesetsk 43/4 - December 5, 2015 (14:09 UTC) (Read 62619 times)

Nicolas PILLET · « **Reply #20 on:** 11/05/2015 05:43 pm »

anik is himself a source !

ostangen · « **Reply #21 on:** 12/01/2015 07:08 am »

A3138/15 - RECEIVED FROM MAIN AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER OF RUSSIA: ROCKET IMPACT AREA IN THE BARENTS SEA 7559N 02126E-7550N 02202E-7531N 02256E-7521N 02252E-7515N 02213E-7524N 02129E-7536N 02051E-7550N 02030E-7559N 02126E. 04 DEC 14:00 2015 UNTIL 06 DEC 03:00 2015. CREATED: 27 NOV 15:01 2015

G4720/15 - TEMPO DANGER AREA ACT WI COORD: 701800N 0334900E-701200N 0340800E-695400N 0344300E- 693300N 0344700E-692500N 0341500E-693500N 0333700E- 695300N 0330500E-701200N 0331100E-701800N 0334900E. SFC - UNL, DAILY 1400-0300, 04 DEC 14:00 2015 UNTIL 06 DEC 03:00 2015. CREATED: 30 NOV 05:59 2015

Somethings due out of PLESETSK between 4 dec- 6 dec, and it might be this launch.

input~2 · « **Reply #22 on:** 12/01/2015 02:39 pm »

Also this one:
G4719/15 - ATS RTE B488 SEGMENT NUTLA - LIMUS CLSD. SFC - UNL, DAILY 1400-0300, 04 DEC 14:00 2015 UNTIL 06 DEC 03:00 2015. CREATED: 30 NOV 05:46 2015

Southernmost zone: 1st stage impact zone
Northernmost zone: Fairing impact zone

input~2 · « **Reply #23 on:** 12/01/2015 04:19 pm »

That was right!

Launch confirmed for December 4 in the afternoon
http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2866989

input~2 · « **Reply #24 on:** 12/02/2015 02:03 pm »

NOTAM for Volga debris (same zone as for first flight)
B6862/15 - TEMPO DANGER AREA NZD025 (EAST AUCKLAND OCEANIC FIR) IS PRESCRIBED AS FLW: ALL THAT AIRSPACE BOUNDED BY A LINE JOINING: S 30 00, W 131 00 S 60 00, W 131 00 S 60 00, W 175 00 S 30 00, W 175 00 S 30 00, W 131 00. ACTIVITY: SPACE DEBRIS RETURN. USER AGENCY: FOREIGN SPACE AGENCY. PRESCRIBED PURSUANT TO CIVIL AVIATION RULE PART 71 UNDER A DELEGATED AUTHORITY ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL AVIATION. SFC - UNL, 04 DEC 14:00 2015 UNTIL 05 DEC 03:00 2015. CREATED: 30 NOV 18:51 2015

Galactic Penguin SST · « **Reply #25 on:** 12/04/2015 06:11 am »

According to our young Russian correspondent Artyom, today's launch date seems to be in doubt...

Satori · « **Reply #26 on:** 12/04/2015 01:07 pm »

Expected lanch time as come and gone... Checking for updates.

Artyom. · « **Reply #27 on:** 12/04/2015 01:27 pm »

Quote from: Satori on 12/04/2015 01:07 pm

Expected lanch time as come and gone... Checking for updates.

Launch rescheduled for tomorrow.

input~2 · « **Reply #28 on:** 12/04/2015 03:20 pm »

Updated NOTAM for Volga
B6962/15 - TEMPO DANGER AREA NZD025 (EAST AUCKLAND OCEANIC FIR) IS PRESCRIBED AS FLW: ALL THAT AIRSPACE BOUNDED BY A LINE JOINING: S 30 00, W 131 00 S 60 00, W 131 00 S 60 00, W 175 00 S 30 00, W 175 00 S 30 00, W 131 00. ACTIVITY: SPACE DEBRIS RETURN. USER AGENCY: FOREIGN SPACE AGENCY. PRESCRIBED PURSUANT TO CIVIL AVIATION RULE PART 71 UNDER A DELEGATED AUTHORITY ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL AVIATION. SFC - UNL, 05 DEC 14:00 2015 UNTIL 06 DEC 03:00 2015. CREATED: 04 DEC 14:58 2015

and for ~~fairing~~ 1st stage
G4781/15 - TEMPO DANGER AREA ACT: 701800N 0334900E-701200N 0340800E-695400N 0344300E- 693300N 0344700E-692500N 0341500E-693500N 0333700E- 695300N 0330500E-701200N 0331100E-701800N 0334900E. SFC - UNL, 05 DEC 14:00 2015 UNTIL 06 DEC 03:00 2015. CREATED: 04 DEC 17:04 2015
G4780/15 - ATS RTE B488 SEGMENT NUTLA - LIMUS CLSD. SFC - UNL, 05 DEC 14:00 2015 UNTIL 06 DEC 03:00 2015. CREATED: 04 DEC 16:56 2015

input~2 · « **Reply #29 on:** 12/05/2015 10:21 am »

According to Russianspaceweb on December 4 liftoff was scheduled for 14:08 UTC

Galactic Penguin SST · « **Reply #30 on:** 12/05/2015 01:10 pm »

Everyone is talking about the Cygnus RTF and somehow the NK-33 RTF slips under the radar...

Has the launch occurred yet?

Artyom. · « **Reply #31 on:** 12/05/2015 01:18 pm »

We have lift-off! http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20151205/1336479351.html

Launch time 14:09 UTC.

Artyom. · « **Reply #32 on:** 12/05/2015 01:27 pm »

Volga separation - http://tass.ru/kosmos/2502405.

All OK

!

edkyle99 · « **Reply #33 on:** 12/05/2015 02:31 pm »

It seems that Volga still has "several hours" of work to do before payload separation.

Anatoly tells us that Kanopus-ST will test methods for detecting submerged submarines using a UHF radiometer.

- Ed Kyle

Artyom. · « **Reply #34 on:** 12/05/2015 02:58 pm »

Spacecraft separation, according to Dmitry Rogozin .

Artyom. · « **Reply #35 on:** 12/05/2015 03:04 pm »

http://www.vesti.ru/videos/show/vid/664606/#

This video on YouTube:

According to the reporter, the names of these satellites - Kosmos-2511 and Kosmos-2512.

Artyom. · « **Reply #36 on:** 12/05/2015 03:15 pm »

Russian media also confirmed the information about the separation of the satellites.

http://www.interfax.ru/world/483365

Stan Black · « **Reply #37 on:** 12/05/2015 03:34 pm »

Quote from: Artyom. on 12/05/2015 03:04 pm

http://www.vesti.ru/videos/show/vid/664606/#

This video on YouTube:

According to the reporter, the names of these satellites - Kosmos-2511 and Kosmos-2512.

Is one of them a 14Ф147?

Quote

Закупка и поставка услуги по организации перевозки МКА 14Ф147 авиатранспортом, иных сопутствующих услуг, связанных с перевозкой.

http://www.zakupki.gov.ru/223/purchase/public/purchase/info/common-info.html?noticeId=3089261

zubenelgenubi · « **Reply #38 on:** 12/05/2015 03:38 pm »

I also read Anatoly's article on his website. Interesting!
That information also explains why these satellites received Kosmos designations.
It also explains why we had no live launch coverage.

The Seasat conspiracists claimed that the satellite power failure was a cover for stopping the satellite's unforeseen abilities from disclosing the position of submerged submarines.

(I think the above conspiracy theory is baloney.)

Is there anything in the open literature to suggest that such a capability CAN exist, much less does?

edkyle99 · « **Reply #39 on:** 12/05/2015 03:40 pm »

Quote from: zubenelgenubi on 12/05/2015 03:38 pm

I also read Anatoly's article on his website. Interesting!
That information also explains why these satellites received Kosmos designations.
It also explains why we had no live launch coverage.

The Seasat conspiracists claimed that the satellite power failure was a cover for stopping the satellite's unforeseen abilities from disclosing the position of submerged submarines.

(I think the above conspiracy theory is baloney.)

Is there anything in the open literature to suggest that such a capability CAN exist, much less does?

Search for "internal waves" and submarines. The focus of research seems to be on using microwaves to detect subtle ocean surface effects. My supposition.

- Ed Kyle