Author Topic: ULA Vulcan Launch Vehicle (as announced/built) - General Discussion Thread 3  (Read 1210939 times)

Online lrk

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 931
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 806
  • Likes Given: 1180
This was a deflagration, not a detonation - so it makes sense that the pressure wave would be travelling ahead of the combustion wave.

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8977
  • Liked: 4913
  • Likes Given: 768
There are two frames of that video with the sides pushed out and no sign of fire (not visible nor light from a reflection).  Then the next frame has the entire top of the building engulfed.  Looks like a pressure release and then a fire unless the fire that caused the pressure increase is extremely well hidden for two whole frames.
Keep in mind in an earlier post it was stated that they had just concluded testing for the day, thus they were likely just heading into detanking and safing operations when the event occurred. It reminds me of similarities to a similar SpaceX Starship incident.

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1687
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 465
  • Likes Given: 199
https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1646572389193625600

Quote from: Tory Bruno @torybruno
Outside of the test rig/ stand. Test article is inside (you can’t see it). Hydrogen leak. H2 accumulated inside the rig. Found an ignition source. Burned fast. Over pressure caved in our forward dome and damaged the rig.

Wow.  Appreciate the transparency in releasing that video, lots of people were clamoring for it though. 

It does help reconcile how this could be considered a "minor" failure, if the violent explosion and most of the damage to the test stand/article was the result of accumulated leaking H2, and not the stage bursting due to structural failure. 

Edit: And apparently, they don't even know if the leak was from the test article or the GSE...

https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1646585104532381696
Given indications from the video that the Centaur V structural test article exploded due to a hydrogen leak, is it possible that minor refinements are being made to the second stage of the Vulcan rocket slated to launch the Peregrine lunar lander to contain any hydrogen leak?

Offline whitelancer64

*yeet tweet*
Quote from: Tory Bruno @torybruno
Outside of the test rig/ stand. Test article is inside (you can’t see it). Hydrogen leak. H2 accumulated inside the rig. Found an ignition source. Burned fast. Over pressure caved in our forward dome and damaged the rig.

Wow.  Appreciate the transparency in releasing that video, lots of people were clamoring for it though. 

It does help reconcile how this could be considered a "minor" failure, if the violent explosion and most of the damage to the test stand/article was the result of accumulated leaking H2, and not the stage bursting due to structural failure. 

Edit: And apparently, they don't even know if the leak was from the test article or the GSE...
*yeet tweet*
Given indications from the video that the Centaur V structural test article exploded due to a hydrogen leak, is it possible that minor refinements are being made to the second stage of the Vulcan rocket slated to launch the Peregrine lunar lander to contain any hydrogen leak?


There shouldn't need to be anything like that. They still don't know if the leak came from the test stand or the test article.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38236
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22789
  • Likes Given: 432

Given indications from the video that the Centaur V structural test article exploded due to a hydrogen leak, is it possible that minor refinements are being made to the second stage of the Vulcan rocket slated to launch the Peregrine lunar lander to contain any hydrogen leak?

No.  Nothing will be done to it until they know the cause.  The leak could have been the test set up.   The Cert-1 vehicle has been tanked a couple of times with LH2.  They would have known if there was a leak.

Online DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7633
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 6203
  • Likes Given: 2625

Given indications from the video that the Centaur V structural test article exploded due to a hydrogen leak, is it possible that minor refinements are being made to the second stage of the Vulcan rocket slated to launch the Peregrine lunar lander to contain any hydrogen leak?
No.  Nothing will be done to it until they know the cause.  The leak could have been the test set up.   The Cert-1 vehicle has been tanked a couple of times with LH2.  They would have known if there was a leak.
Yep. The H2 was apparently trapped inside the test stand, not inside the test article. If this is confirmed, then the explosion/deflagration/boom/whatever is merely the result of a leak that might be part of the test stand and may be irrelevant to the Centaur V to be used on the Cert-1 flight.

Offline Robert_the_Doll

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1110
  • Florida
  • Liked: 2038
  • Likes Given: 530
Interesting statement by Tory Bruno:

https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1646593698480943104

I realize that this might be a bit of a misstatement by him, but does this mean that all Centaur V testing is done or all Vulcan Centaur qualification testing is complete?

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6819
  • California
  • Liked: 8525
  • Likes Given: 5439
Wow.  Appreciate the transparency in releasing that video, lots of people were clamoring for it though. 

It does help reconcile how this could be considered a "minor" failure, if the violent explosion and most of the damage to the test stand/article was the result of accumulated leaking H2, and not the stage bursting due to structural failure. 

Edit: And apparently, they don't even know if the leak was from the test article or the GSE...
I’m not going to give them too much credit for transparency when they only published this after a lot of people requesting it - and after the image showing the fireball from Marshall was released.

I’m pretty certain Tory had his way none of this would have been released.
« Last Edit: 04/14/2023 01:39 am by Lars-J »

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8977
  • Liked: 4913
  • Likes Given: 768
Interesting statement by Tory Bruno:

https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1646593698480943104

I realize that this might be a bit of a misstatement by him, but does this mean that all Centaur V testing is done or all Vulcan Centaur qualification testing is complete?
AFAIU:
All testing required prior to the Cert-1 booster FRF static firing test and launch.
« Last Edit: 04/14/2023 12:52 am by russianhalo117 »

Offline Robert_the_Doll

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1110
  • Florida
  • Liked: 2038
  • Likes Given: 530
If that is true, then it means that BE-4 qualification has been successfully completed.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57070
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94008
  • Likes Given: 43963
Quote
Source of H2 leak? Has it been determined if Centaur test article or GSE?

https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1646623164343128064

Quote
Not yet

Quote
How would you go about working out the source? Assuming the blast destroyed most of the evidence to where the source was

https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1646595485669658625

Quote
Because it was a deflagration (fire) not a detonation, the cylinder is buckled but intact and the dome pieces are large and lying inside the tank. If the leak was in the test article, we’ll find it.

Quote
So after you figure the leak out can you redo the test at say Stennis or will you have to wait to rebuild this test stand ?

https://twitter.com/torybruno/status/1646612944682369024

Quote
Got through 14 tests before this one. May not need a full Centaur to finish

Online DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7633
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 6203
  • Likes Given: 2625
If that is true, then it means that BE-4 qualification has been successfully completed.
No, that is an ambiguous implied antecedent. "everything else" may be the rest of the Centaur tests or the rest of the Vulcan Centaur tests. I think it's just the Centaur tests, because if the BE-4 qual was completed ULA and/or BO would make an announcement.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57070
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94008
  • Likes Given: 43963

Offline Robert_the_Doll

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1110
  • Florida
  • Liked: 2038
  • Likes Given: 530
If that is true, then it means that BE-4 qualification has been successfully completed.
No, that is an ambiguous implied antecedent. "everything else" may be the rest of the Centaur tests or the rest of the Vulcan Centaur tests. I think it's just the Centaur tests, because if the BE-4 qual was completed ULA and/or BO would make an announcement.

That is not necessarily a given based on past experience. An announcement might come days or even a week or two from now. For instance, the completion of the first flight engine shipset barely warranted a couple of twitter posts and a single, quiet press release. The start of qualification testing did not even get much mention anywhere by either ULA nor Blue Origin, and only a month ago was there a first mention of it, several months after it had begun.  Nor was there a press release about Huntsville building and then delivering Qualification-1 to Texas. It was not until a video was released without fanfare that it was even mentioned as a thing.

I keep hearing "Advanced Upper Stage" vis-a-vis Centaur V. Can someone here please define "Advanced Upper Stage"?

Offline AS_501

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 585
  • Pittsburgh, PA
  • Liked: 420
  • Likes Given: 348
I assume imagery from one or several high-speed cameras will help with the incident's investigation.
Launches attended:  Apollo 11, ASTP (@KSC, not Baikonur!), STS-41G, STS-125, EFT-1, Starlink G4-24, Artemis 1
Notable Spacecraft Observed:  Echo 1, Skylab/S-II, Salyuts 6&7, Mir Core/Complete, HST, ISS Zarya/Present, Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, Atlantis, Dragon Demo-2, Starlink G4-14 (8 hrs. post-launch), Tiangong

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1687
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 465
  • Likes Given: 199
I keep hearing "Advanced Upper Stage" vis-a-vis Centaur V. Can someone here please define "Advanced Upper Stage"?
I think that "Advanced Upper Stage" you mention refers to the Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage, because that upper stage was the ancestral design for what is now the Centaur V.

I keep hearing "Advanced Upper Stage" vis-a-vis Centaur V. Can someone here please define "Advanced Upper Stage"?
I think that "Advanced Upper Stage" you mention refers to the Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage, because that upper stage was the ancestral design for what is now the Centaur V.
The ACES, I get it, thanks. After reading about it, it sounds like it didn't happen.
I was just trying to better understand the advantages of Vulcan.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38236
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22789
  • Likes Given: 432
I keep hearing "Advanced Upper Stage" vis-a-vis Centaur V. Can someone here please define "Advanced Upper Stage"?
I think that "Advanced Upper Stage" you mention refers to the Advanced Cryogenic Evolved Stage, because that upper stage was the ancestral design for what is now the Centaur V.

Barely.  More like a fat dual engine Centaur III with inverted tanks. 

"In late 2017, ULA decided to bring the 5.4 m (18 ft) diameter and advanced insulation elements of the ACES upper stage forward. Under the new plan, Vulcan's upper stage is the Centaur V, with two LH2/LOX RL10 engines and no IVF or other ACES extended-duration technology[1] as had been planned for ACES"
« Last Edit: 04/15/2023 06:01 pm by Jim »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57070
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94008
  • Likes Given: 43963
Have split off 60 odd posts on the competitiveness of Vulcan to a new thread: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=58661.0

The intent of this thread was to focus on the development and engineering of Vulcan.

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1