Author Topic: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012  (Read 128084 times)

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39462
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25586
  • Likes Given: 12240
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #100 on: 04/30/2012 07:04 pm »
This is a sequence hold, not necessarily are they aborting the whole thing just yet.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline rcoppola

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2380
  • USA
  • Liked: 2020
  • Likes Given: 1018
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #101 on: 04/30/2012 07:04 pm »
Any idea where the transients are being tracked to?
Sail the oceans of space and set foot upon new lands!
http://www.stormsurgemedia.com

Online Chris Bergin

Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #102 on: 04/30/2012 07:05 pm »
They aborted the sequence, not the attempt. They'll either recycle to the terminal count or scrub.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline arkaska

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3042
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #103 on: 04/30/2012 07:06 pm »
Like Robotbeat said, holding no abort get

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8660
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3878
  • Likes Given: 806
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #104 on: 04/30/2012 07:07 pm »
A rule of thumb: if you see the vehicle starting to vent again after around T-40 sec, it's a safe bet the count was aborted.

Offline nblackwell

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
  • Somewhere in Southern California
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #105 on: 04/30/2012 07:07 pm »
If they go again, expect a recycle to T-13:00 or so.

Online Chris Bergin

Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #106 on: 04/30/2012 07:08 pm »
Notable point is that would have resulted in a scrub on launch day due to the instant launch window. So it's good to get this out of the way now.
« Last Edit: 04/30/2012 07:08 pm by Chris Bergin »
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline mmeijeri

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7772
  • Martijn Meijering
  • NL
  • Liked: 397
  • Likes Given: 824
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #107 on: 04/30/2012 07:08 pm »
A rule of thumb: if you see the vehicle starting to vent again after around T-40 sec, it's a safe bet the count was aborted.

To me it looked as if the upper stage never stopped venting.
Pro-tip: you don't have to be a jerk if someone doesn't agree with your theories

Offline arkaska

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3042
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #108 on: 04/30/2012 07:08 pm »
Do we know if it was an automated or manual hold?

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #109 on: 04/30/2012 07:08 pm »
Disabling the prop systems.

noticed the lox never closed and pressurized.  When does this happen in the count?
2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Offline arkaska

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3042
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #110 on: 04/30/2012 07:10 pm »
Disabling the prop systems.

noticed the lox never closed and pressurized.  When does this happen in the count?


Think this was for Dragon since we don't hear LV comm

Online Chris Bergin

Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #111 on: 04/30/2012 07:10 pm »
No info on the plan yet.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online Chris Bergin

Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #112 on: 04/30/2012 07:11 pm »
@SpaceX:

"Reviewing data"
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline arkaska

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3042
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #113 on: 04/30/2012 07:11 pm »
From SpaceX twitter:

Quote
Reviewing data

Offline oiorionsbelt

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1768
  • Liked: 1192
  • Likes Given: 2694
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #114 on: 04/30/2012 07:11 pm »
A rule of thumb: if you see the vehicle starting to vent again after around T-40 sec, it's a safe bet the count was aborted.
I noticed a lot of venting, just before the hold, from the second umbilical down at the strong back. Normal?

Offline Wyvern

  • Member
  • Posts: 99
  • Welp here I am
  • Calgary
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #115 on: 04/30/2012 07:12 pm »
Phew for a few moments it didn't seem like the livestream was working for me. Works now though.
Darn it where is my Moon base!

Offline Alpha Control

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1238
  • Washington, DC
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 112
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #116 on: 04/30/2012 07:12 pm »
Disabling the prop systems.

noticed the lox never closed and pressurized.  When does this happen in the count?


I believe pressurization occurs at T-40 seconds.
Space launches attended:
Antares/Cygnus ORB-D1 Wallops Island, VA Sept 2013 | STS-123 KSC, FL March 2008 | SpaceShipOne Mojave, CA June 2004

Offline Space OurSoul

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
  • Seattle, WA
  • Liked: 183
  • Likes Given: 50
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #117 on: 04/30/2012 07:12 pm »
A rule of thumb: if you see the vehicle starting to vent again after around T-40 sec, it's a safe bet the count was aborted.

On a related note- can we presume continued venting means no prop offload so far, so not aborted *yet*?
A complete OurSoul

Offline brettreds2k

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 738
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 42
Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #118 on: 04/30/2012 07:13 pm »
Clocks have reset to 13 minutes
Brett
www.facebook.com/brett.lowenthal1

Orbiters I have visited in retirement:

[ ] Enterprise
[X] Discovery
[X] Atlantis
[ ] Endeavour

Online Chris Bergin

Re: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fire - April 30, 2012
« Reply #119 on: 04/30/2012 07:13 pm »
So clearly there is an opportunity to recycle - pending the data review on giving this another shot today.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0