Author Topic: Hazegrayart Master Thread  (Read 134666 times)

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27745
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22803
  • Likes Given: 13487
Hazegrayart Master Thread
« on: 03/16/2023 06:27 am »
This is the main thread for Hazegrayart's space animation videos. All threads from 2019 are tagged below for easy reference, and each subject is linked back to its original thread.

Added a new subcategory to allow posting for other CGI Artists. 


All Previous Hazegrayart Threads scattered in NSF

The Methane Rocket Revolution is Here
SpaceX Starship Launch Animation from the Cape
Hyperion: The Fully Reusable SSTO!
Hypersonic Lifting Body To Space: The FDL-5
Apollo Command and Service Module Shuttle
alt history - Soviet Moon landing
Hillers Air Tug - Saturn V 1st state mid-air recovery
Lenticular Reentry Vehicle a Nuclear Warhead Delivery System
Reusable One-Stage Orbital Space Truck (ROOST)
Bedpost Rocket the Kistler K-1
HOTOL SSTO spaceplane animation
Saturn V-4X(U)
SpaceX Starship Mars Landing - Simulation
Boeing Space Freighter Fully Reusable Rocket Spaceplane
Lockheed's LS-200 Star Clipper Spaceplane
International Space Station Deorbit Sim
TWA Moonliner animation
Animation of Saturn shuttle with fly-back booster
Animation of Jupiter III Shuttle Derived LV
Shuttle-derived HLV animation (Oct 2020)
Animation of Soviet An-225 launched OOS (Buran replacement)
Nova rocket animation
HLV animation: If Rockets were Transparent
Animation of 1960s British MUSTARD RLV
Hazegrayart: CGI recreation of the N1 launch
Rombus Rocket 1960's era Reusable Rocket by Philip Bono
The DC-3 Fully Reusable Space Shuttle early Concept

From this point onward, any Hazegrayart videos and user comments will/should be posted directly to this thread rather than starting individual threads.  Enjoy.   Tony.

All new Hazegrayart post listings for this thread with embedded links

Crewed Mars Mission on Philip Bono's Mars Glider
DARPA's STAR (Spaceplane Technology and Research) Space Cruiser
Roton Rotary Rocket SSTO with Helicopter Landing
Chrysler’s Space Shuttle Proposal: the SSTO SERV and MURP
Philip Bono's Reusable Single Stage to Orbit Rocket (SSTO)
Japan's Tourism Reusable Rocket. The Kankoh-mar
Philip Bono's study of a reusable Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO)
Saturn Shuttle with Flyback Booster
Rocket Lab's Reusable Neutron Rocket Animation
The MAKS Spaceplane: Multipurpose aerospace system (Russian: МАКС)
A Transparent Soyuz Rocket Launch from Baikonur
An-325: The Giant Carrier for Britain's Interim HOTOL Spaceplane
Buran, Space Shuttle of the Soviet Union, Energia Rocket
Project Super Orion Nuclear Pulse Propulsion Interstellar Ark
Soviet Union's other Moon Rocket: UR-700A
Soviet Moon Landing an Alternative History
Up Close Personal View of an Atlas 5 Launch
SpaceX Starship Hot Staging Cinematic
Project Orion - Secret Mars Mission Powered by Nuclear BombsSea Dragon Rocket: World's Largest Reusable Rocket Concept
NASA's Lunar Outpost Heavy Lift Vehicle: The Comet Rocket
U.S. Navy SPACE CRUISER Concept - Neptune Spear   
ESA's Airbus Reusable Rocket: The Adeline   
China's Space Station "Tiangong" Fly Around   
Germany's low-cost Launch Vehicle "OTRAG"
Martin Marietta Spacemaster ShuttleSpaceX Starship Moon Profile
Dr. Hans Zarkov's rocket ship
Langley Research Center Unpressurized Crew Transport with Surface Habitat: 0605-LLPS-LaRC-2
Unconventional Liftoffs: The Hydrofoil Albatros Rocket
Von Braun's Lunar Lander
Junkers RT-8 (Saenger I) Rail Launched Space Plane
DARPA Hammerhead Space Shuttle Concept
Kliper Spaceplane: ESA-Russia Collaboration that never Materialized
The Methane Rocket Revolution is Here
Mig-105 Hypersonic Soviet Space Interceptor
R-56 Polyblock Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle
Boeing Recoverable Launch Booster
ReNova SSTO Rocket Concept Developed by Martin
The Artemis Gateway and SpaceX's Human Landing System: The Race for Return to the Moon
Energia Vulkan Moon Rocket
Saturn V "Modified Launch Vehicle"
Boeing Rocket Concepts
The Boeing X-20 Dyna-Soar Spaceplane Launching on a Titan IIIC concept
Boeing Recoverable Launch Booster
Saturn V-4X(U) 1 Million Pound Payload: The Beast
Boeing's 4 Million lbs Payload Rocket (LMLV) Large Multipurpose Launch Vehicle Concept
Boeing Space Freighter Fully Reusable 420 Ton Payload Rocket Spaceplane
Boeing's Low cost Heavy Lift Vehicle VTVL SSTO "The Big Onion"
Boeing's SRB-X Space Shuttle Derived Unmanned Launch Vehicle Concept
McDonnell Douglas X-33 SSTO Reusable Launch Vehicle
SpaceX Falcon XX Super Heavy Concept
Space Shuttle Carrier Proposals
Rockwell C-1057 "Breadbox" Space Shuttle Concept
XB-70 Valkyrie Hypersonic Air Launcher
Future Rocket Drone Ships
British Interplanetary Society: Project Daedalus
Martin Nova Post-Saturn Reusable Rocket
Rocket Air Launch Concepts
Russia's Other Space Shuttle: VTOL MTKVA
Space Station Freedom
Humpback Shuttle, External Tank Space Station
Titan IIIL Heavy Lift Concept
10 Soviet/Russian Spacecraft Designs That Never Flew
Super Nexus: Nuclear Powered Rocket
Titan Barbarian Rocket and Zenith Star SDI "Star Wars"]
Could Starship Save the ISS? Boosting to New Heights!Hypersonic Lifting Body Deployment from a C-5 Galaxy
NASA's Survivable Crew Compartment Space Shuttle
McDonnell Douglas Star Wars Rocket
Most Powerful Rocket Booster Ever Made
Launching Rockets from Aircraft Carriers: A United States Navy Horrible Idea
First Soft Landing on the Moon: Luna 9
Buran Space Shuttle MIR-2 Space Station


Project Orion Battleship <<<  The following ADDED Dec 15, 2025



Other CGI Artist Contributions of Interest

Rocket Man - A KSP Cinematic
Pathfinder Shuttle Maiden Flight
Conroy Virtus
The Big Damn Airplane - Howard DBA

The Very First Rocket Ship - `1950s Von Braun
How To Fly An Entire Moon Base In One Go - Saturn V 2.0 - Convair Nexus
Launched from the biggest plane in the world - MAKS Molniya
Space: 1959 - A Lunar Odyssey
« Last Edit: 12/15/2025 06:07 pm by catdlr »
PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57753
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94844
  • Likes Given: 44764
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #1 on: 03/31/2023 12:21 pm »


Quote
In the year 1960, Philip Bono, a highly specialized Space Vehicle Design Specialist affiliated with the Boeing Airplane Company, formulated a conceptualization of a pioneering manned spacecraft intended for Mars. The outward visage of this spacecraft was fashioned in a manner which exhibited similarities to the X-20A Dyna-Soar single-seat orbital glider concurrently under development at his organization on behalf of the United States Air Force. However, Bono's cerebral rendition of the Mars glider embodied noteworthy dimensional dissimilarities when compared to the Dyna-Soar -- namely, it was of an enormity that was capable of accommodating an eight-man "expeditionary force," and nearly 40 tons of supplies and equipment. The prodigious Mars glider boasted a flat-bellied physique that spanned a monumental 125 feet in length, and an impressive 95 feet across its delta wings.

The Mars glider, once fully assembled and loaded with liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellants, stood at a towering height of 248 feet, weighing in at an impressive 4150 tons. This colossal spacecraft was encompassed by six elongated outboard booster rockets, designed to enshroud and conceal the short booster, living module/rocket stage, and the majority of the aft portion of the glider.

Bono's original vision of the Mars glider was equipped with scientific instruments that would enable it to scrutinize the Red Planet's surface and atmosphere. This glider would harness the power of its wings to generate lift, and it would have been controlled remotely from the mother ship. The spacecraft would have been launched from a mother ship which was stationed in orbit around Mars.

Even though the Mars Glider concept never came to complete fruition nor was it ever launched, it nevertheless played a consequential role in the technological advancements of other Mars exploration technologies. Additionally, this epoch-making conceptualization inspired a plethora of forthcoming space exploration concepts.

Epic Unease by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...

Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-...

Artist: http://incompetech.com/
« Last Edit: 03/31/2023 12:22 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17818
  • Liked: 10652
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #2 on: 03/31/2023 01:16 pm »
I don't know how this guy is able to do this stuff. He's not selling ads, and clearly these videos are a lot of work. Truly impressive.

Offline MattMason

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
  • Space Enthusiast
  • Indiana
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 2176
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #3 on: 03/31/2023 02:37 pm »
I don't know how this guy is able to do this stuff. He's not selling ads, and clearly these videos are a lot of work. Truly impressive.

I emailed him the suggestion to do the Apollo CSM Shuttle, and was not at all disappointed.
If the guy doesn't work for an aerospace agency, he should be.
"Why is the logo on the side of a rocket so important?"
"So you can find the pieces." -Jim, the Steely Eyed

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27745
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22803
  • Likes Given: 13487
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #4 on: 04/18/2023 05:53 pm »
DARPA's STAR (Spaceplane Technology and Research) Space Cruiser

Quote
Apr 18, 2023
The fundamental concept behind the STAR program was to maximize efficiency while minimizing cost. To achieve this goal, the craft was designed to be as small and inexpensive as possible, with only one crew member onboard. The crew compartment itself was unpressurized and only large enough for a seated astronaut, who would be required to remain in their spacesuit throughout the duration of the mission. Notably, the craft lacked key features such as hydraulics, an ejection seat, or even landing gear. Instead, it would utilize a parawing to glide back to Earth and touch down on land.

Despite its Spartan design, the STAR was intended to function as an orbital runabout, capable of carrying out a variety of missions. The craft was eight meters in length and only a meter and a half tall at its aft end, tapering down to a fine point at its nose. To optimize its transportability, the nose was designed to fold back at a hinge four meters down from the tip of the STAR, creating a compact package just four meters in length.

In terms of deployment, the Shuttle was expected to lift the STAR into orbit, potentially even multiple at a time, and deploy them from its cargo bay. Once in space, the STAR would set off on its designated missions, either returning to the Shuttle or making its own way back to Earth. If the STAR needed to reach higher altitudes beyond its on-board propellant capacity (which was estimated to be around 1650 kilometers), a truncated Centaur stage equipped with a single RD-10 engine - known as the Centaur-SP - could be attached to the STAR for increased thrust. This configuration would fit into the Shuttle's cargo bay, allowing for transport to geosynchronous orbit and beyond.

PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17818
  • Liked: 10652
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #5 on: 04/19/2023 02:00 pm »
I gotta admit that this one is just bizarre. And despite the description, it's hard to understand exactly what this thing was supposed to do. Why?

I sure hope that astronaut pulled his head in before reentry, though.

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1815
  • Likes Given: 1302
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #6 on: 04/19/2023 05:08 pm »
I gotta admit that this one is just bizarre. And despite the description, it's hard to understand exactly what this thing was supposed to do. Why?
<snip>
Remember reading about something like this in a Sci-fi magazine during the 80s. Basically adapting a slight scaled up ICBM reentry vehicle for nukes to be a crew capable reentry vehicle. The flight characteristics of the reentry vehicle is well understood and tested.

IMO, the vehicle could be use as a supplemental lifeboat for a space station in LEO. Of course you will need some kind of EVA suits for the whole crew. Which means you could use this vehicle as lifeboats on the Shuttle.

The use of the vehicle docked to the cut down Centaur is more interesting. In theory you could use it to transfer between the Shuttle in LEO and an orbital platform in a higher orbit. It will be cheap since the flight controls are presumably in the Centaur and no other modifications is required other than more consumables for the single crew. Think there is enough delta-V left in the Centaur for a reentry burn after reaching the higher orbital platform.

Of course the vehicle concept is a bit crazy.

Offline kenny008

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 188
  • Knoxville, TN
  • Liked: 170
  • Likes Given: 2919
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #7 on: 04/19/2023 05:45 pm »
I gotta admit that this one is just bizarre. And despite the description, it's hard to understand exactly what this thing was supposed to do. Why?

I sure hope that astronaut pulled his head in before reentry, though.

That 60g reentry load on a typical ICBM RV is probably a bit uncomfortable for that guy, too.

Offline Larry Golo

  • Member
  • Posts: 35
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 145
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #8 on: 04/19/2023 06:22 pm »
"Opinions are like a$$holes. Everybody has one." Dirty Harry Callahan.

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17818
  • Liked: 10652
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #9 on: 04/19/2023 06:48 pm »
I gotta admit that this one is just bizarre. And despite the description, it's hard to understand exactly what this thing was supposed to do. Why?

I sure hope that astronaut pulled his head in before reentry, though.

That 60g reentry load on a typical ICBM RV is probably a bit uncomfortable for that guy, too.

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17818
  • Liked: 10652
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #10 on: 04/19/2023 06:55 pm »
Remember reading about something like this in a Sci-fi magazine during the 80s. Basically adapting a slight scaled up ICBM reentry vehicle for nukes to be a crew capable reentry vehicle. The flight characteristics of the reentry vehicle is well understood and tested.

IMO, the vehicle could be use as a supplemental lifeboat for a space station in LEO. Of course you will need some kind of EVA suits for the whole crew. Which means you could use this vehicle as lifeboats on the Shuttle.

The use of the vehicle docked to the cut down Centaur is more interesting. In theory you could use it to transfer between the Shuttle in LEO and an orbital platform in a higher orbit. It will be cheap since the flight controls are presumably in the Centaur and no other modifications is required other than more consumables for the single crew. Think there is enough delta-V left in the Centaur for a reentry burn after reaching the higher orbital platform.

Of course the vehicle concept is a bit crazy.

I will acknowledge that because this was never built, they never successfully answered the "why" question to the point where they convinced somebody it had value.

But it's really mystifying that this was even proposed. Was there any requirement at all that was even slightly relevant to this? I cannot think of one. If you need to move astronauts to a different orbit, then you design a vehicle for that. You wouldn't also need to bring them back to Earth on that same vehicle. It just seems too wild even for a comic book explanation.

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1815
  • Likes Given: 1302
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #11 on: 04/20/2023 04:57 am »
<snip>
If you need to move astronauts to a different orbit, then you design a vehicle for that. You wouldn't also need to bring them back to Earth on that same vehicle.
<snip>
Consider how much and how long developing some sort of crew rated pressurized space tug will take when the DARPA STAR concept was published. Kinda doubt that funding can be found for the space tug during that period while paying for the Shuttle program.

As for bring the astronauts back from a higher orbit to a lower orbit than transferring to a Shuttle going back to Earth. You need a crew rated space tug. Plus the Shuttle is very expensive to use as a LEO Crew taxi and only have about 2 weeks of operational time in LEO before the fuel cell commodities are exhausted.

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27745
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22803
  • Likes Given: 13487
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #12 on: 04/21/2023 07:51 am »
This is an old one that Steven Pietrobon found and posted in another thread.

Roton Rotary Rocket SSTO with Helicopter Landing

Quote
Dec 15, 2020
Rotary Rocket Company was a rocketry company that developed the Roton concept in the late 1990s as a fully reusable single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) crewed spacecraft with a rotating annular aerospike engine to pump fuel and oxidizer to the rim by the rotation and a helicopter rotor on top used for landing.
The design was initially conceived by Bevin McKinney, who shared it with Gary Hudson.



PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27745
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22803
  • Likes Given: 13487
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #13 on: 04/21/2023 07:55 am »
This is one of my all-time favorites and has over 4Million hits.  Way over-the-top concept. Enjoy

Chrysler’s Space Shuttle Proposal: the SSTO SERV and MURP

Jun 3, 2020
Quote
Chrysler Aerospace was already contracted for the Saturn 1 and 1B First Stage so in 1971
they proposed an alternate shuttle program, the SERV and MURP
 
SERV: the Single-stage Earth-orbital Reusable Vehicle had a 53 metric ton payload in a  7m x 18m payload bay 
12 LH2/LOX aerospike engines were arranged around the rim of the base, covered by movable metal shields
Jet Engines, which were fired just prior to touchdown in order to slow the descent


MURP, the Manned Upper-stage Reusable Payload
The MURP was based on the HL-10 lifting body (Six Million Dollar Man test Vehicle) and a Larger Versionone larger (the D-34) could carry up to ten passengers

PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27745
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22803
  • Likes Given: 13487
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #14 on: 04/21/2023 08:01 am »
Here is an SSTO concept from Douglas Aircraft

Philip Bono's Reusable Single Stage to Orbit Rocket (SSTO)

Quote
Jun 1, 2022
Douglas Aircraft's SASSTO, short for "Saturn Application Single Stage to Orbit", was a single-stage to orbit (SSTO) reusable launch system designed by Philip Bono's team in 1967. SASSTO was a study in minimalist designs, a launcher with the specific intent of repeatedly placing a Gemini capsule in orbit for the lowest possible cost. The SASSTO booster was based on the layout of the S-IVB upper stage from the Saturn family, modified with a plug nozzle.

PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57753
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94844
  • Likes Given: 44764
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #15 on: 04/30/2023 01:13 pm »


Quote
Japan's Tourism Reusable Rocket. The Kankoh-maru (観光丸, Kankōmaru)

Hazegrayart
7 May 2022

Kankoh-maru is a single-stage reusable orbital passenger aircraft is a proposed vertical takeoff and landing (VTVL), single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO), reusable launch system that has been studied by the Japanese Rocket Society since 1993.
According to a document from July 1997, it would have been manufactured by Kawasaki Heavy Industries and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.

The passenger capacity is 50, which is the same as that of a sightseeing bus, and the crew is a pilot and a stewardess, 2 each. The rooms are two-story, with the seats facing outwards and circular so that all passengers can sit and look out the window. The cockpit and the entrance to the space hotel are on the 2nd floor, and the 2 entrances and exits for takeoff and landing and the toilet are on the 1st floor. The weightless swimming space is a stairwell on the 1st and 2nd floors and has large windows. The entrance on the 2nd floor is doubled, and you can do outside activities if you wear a space suit.

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27745
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22803
  • Likes Given: 13487
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #16 on: 05/09/2023 07:54 am »
Here is one video posted six months ago.



Quote
Oct 10, 2022
Philip Bono's study of a reusable Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO)
The Douglas Aircraft Reusable One-Stage Orbital Space Truck (ROOST)

The reentry and recovery system for the ROOST booster would gradually deploy and inflate with hot gases to gently land like a hot air balloon.

PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27745
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22803
  • Likes Given: 13487
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #17 on: 05/14/2023 09:10 am »
Saturn Shuttle with Flyback Booster

originally posted by FutureSpaceTourist

Cross-posted:
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=54564.0
PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27745
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22803
  • Likes Given: 13487
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #18 on: 05/15/2023 07:47 am »
Rocket Lab's Reusable Neutron Rocket Animation



Quote
Aug 1, 2022
Neutron is a medium-lift two-stage launch vehicle under development by Rocket Lab. The vehicle is being designed to be capable of delivering an 8,000 kg (17,600 lb) payload to low Earth orbit in a reusable configuration and will focus on the growing mega constellation satellite delivery market. The vehicle is expected to be operational sometime in 2024. It uses LOX and liquid methane propellant on both stages of the vehicle.

On 28 February 2022, Rocket Lab announced that Neutron will launch from the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) within NASA's Wallops Flight Facility on the eastern coast of Virginia. It was also announced that the company will build a 250,000 square feet manufacturing and operations facility adjacent to the Wallops Flight Facility.  The ground was broken for this facility on 11 April 2022. As of December 2021, Rocket Lab is planning for the first launch to take place no earlier than 2024.

Shorter portrait version:

« Last Edit: 06/19/2023 02:50 am by catdlr »
PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57753
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94844
  • Likes Given: 44764
Re: Hazegrayart Master Thread
« Reply #19 on: 05/15/2023 09:41 am »


Quote
The MAKS Spaceplane: Multipurpose aerospace system (Russian: МАКС)

2020 31 Aug

The MAKS (Multipurpose aerospace system) (Russian: МАКС (Многоцелевая авиационно-космическая система)) was a Soviet air-launched reusable launch system project that was proposed in 1988, but cancelled in 1991.  An offshoot of the  ENERGIA-BURAN program it had two RD-701 rocket tri-propellant engines based on RD-170 engine from the first stage of ENERGIA rocket and using an Antonov An-225 as a  mobile launch platform

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0