Poll

Will the CFT Starliner land safely?

Yes, Butch & Suni could have ridden it down with no problems
42 (68.9%)
Yes, but occupants would have been uncomfortable
3 (4.9%)
Yes, but occupants would have landed off-target
3 (4.9%)
No, occupants would have been seriously injured
0 (0%)
Some combination of 2, 3 & 4
10 (16.4%)
No, capsule will be lost at some point in the return
3 (4.9%)

Total Members Voted: 61

Voting closed: 09/07/2024 11:32 am


Author Topic: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6  (Read 657165 times)

Offline seb21051

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Michigan, USA
  • Liked: 160
  • Likes Given: 548
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1400 on: 06/11/2024 05:28 pm »
New Glenn could launch Starliner.

Is NG man-rated? I thought I saw something along those lines somewhere.

Online DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6952
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 5658
  • Likes Given: 2354
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1401 on: 06/11/2024 05:38 pm »
Boeing is still half-owner of ULA, so (to a first approximation) they would get half the profit of the Vulcan-Centaur upgrade. Congress should require a competitive bid for the next LV. Unless it was excluded from bidding, Falcon 9 would win.

SpaceX is trying to replace Falcon with Starship. SpaceX may decide that launching Starliner with Falcon in the 2030s would interfere with their Falcon retirement plans and raise the price to Boeing a lot to make up for it. This may let Vulcan, Terran R, Neutron, MLV, New Glenn, or Starship win the contract to launch Starliner post-Atlas.
True. But the entire hypothesis is flawed: there is no obvious mechanism for Congress to appropriate money to pay for crew-rating of any launcher for Starliner. CCP is supposed to be a services contract.

Offline cpushack

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 489
  • Klamath Falls, Oregon
  • Liked: 570
  • Likes Given: 148
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1402 on: 06/11/2024 06:15 pm »
Is Starliner going to be safe enough for the two astronauts to come home?  Helium, I assume, pressurizes the hypergolic fuel.  Not enough pressure, thrusters won't operate properly.

Starliner in its current (stable) state attached to the ISS has all the Helium manifolds turned off, so no leaking until undocking.

It has ~70 hours of free flying flight capability left after all the leaking on the way up, they only need a few hours of that to undock and deorbit, so should be fine

Offline jstrotha0975

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
  • United States
  • Liked: 374
  • Likes Given: 3077
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1403 on: 06/11/2024 07:25 pm »
New Glenn could launch Starliner.

Is NG man-rated? I thought I saw something along those lines somewhere.

New Glenn isn't currently man-rated, but I do believe they said it possibly would be in the future, that and New Glenn will probably be cheaper than Vulcan.

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1253
  • UK
  • Liked: 2154
  • Likes Given: 274
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1404 on: 06/11/2024 07:42 pm »
New Glenn isn't currently man-rated, but I do believe they said it possibly would be in the future, that and New Glenn will probably be cheaper than Vulcan.

Blue Origin have a crew capsule project, so New Glenn will eventually require man-rating. Also launching Starliner on a 7 m diameter rocket would mean the aeroskirt could be deleted.

https://twitter.com/DrChrisCombs/status/1527695992543404034

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12339
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 19129
  • Likes Given: 13352
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1405 on: 06/12/2024 12:19 pm »
New Glenn isn't currently man-rated, but I do believe they said it possibly would be in the future, that and New Glenn will probably be cheaper than Vulcan.

Blue Origin have a crew capsule project, so New Glenn will eventually require man-rating. Also launching Starliner on a 7 m diameter rocket would mean the aeroskirt could be deleted.

https://twitter.com/DrChrisCombs/status/1527695992543404034

Oooof. Linking to Chris Combs to "explain" the Starliner aero skirt. Not the smartest thing to do IMO. That's like linking to ESGHound to "illustrate" the EIS for Starship at Boca Chica.

More reliable sources for why the aeroskirt exists are:
- https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2016/10/atlas-v-starliner-mitigate-aerodynamic-issues/
- https://www.ulalaunch.com/docs/default-source/rockets/atlasvstarliner.pdf
- https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-atlas-v-rocket-aeroskirt-explained.html

Offline matthewkantar

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2321
  • Liked: 2852
  • Likes Given: 2401
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1406 on: 06/12/2024 03:37 pm »
Whom ever bids on future ISS crew missions has to include the cost of launch, just like SpaceX did. There are/will be plenty of combinations of launchers and vehicles  to choose from. Putting a thumb on the scale won’t help Boeing, it’ll make them worse.

Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1407 on: 06/12/2024 10:36 pm »
Why was the Crew Dragon DM-2 first manned flight scheduled for 60 days and Starliner only a week?

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1253
  • UK
  • Liked: 2154
  • Likes Given: 274
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1408 on: 06/12/2024 10:55 pm »
Why was the Crew Dragon DM-2 first manned flight scheduled for 60 days and Starliner only a week?

SpaceNews article:

Quote
The agency’s original plan for Demo-2 was for it to be a short test flight, lasting roughly two weeks, but NASA chose to extend it to address a shortfall in crew time on the station. Only three people, including just one NASA astronaut, Chris Cassidy, were on the ISS at the time Demo-2 launched.

Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1409 on: 06/12/2024 10:57 pm »
I recall that, but why originally was Spacex 2 weeks vs. one week for Starliner?

Offline 1

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 404
  • El Segundo, CA
  • Liked: 956
  • Likes Given: 10
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1410 on: 06/12/2024 11:00 pm »
Both vehicles had similar mission profiles back then, including a potential mission extensions. CFT-1 would also have been conditionally approved for an extension had the OFT-1 mission gone well. IIRC, the possibility of CFT-1 mission extension was actually discussed before DM-2. At the time, both providers appeared pretty close in terms of timelines of getting their vehicles operational. I personally would have never guessed things would play out the way they actually did. Better late than never though.

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1253
  • UK
  • Liked: 2154
  • Likes Given: 274
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1411 on: 06/12/2024 11:10 pm »
Both vehicles had similar mission profiles back then, including a potential mission extensions. CFT-1 would also have been conditionally approved for an extension had the OFT-1 mission gone well. IIRC, the possibility of CFT-1 mission extension was actually discussed before DM-2. At the time, both providers appeared pretty close in terms of timelines of getting their vehicles operational. I personally would have never guessed things would play out the way they actually did. Better late than never though.

Mentioned here in NASA's June 2022 update:

Quote
Based upon current space station resources and scheduling needs, a short duration mission with two astronaut test pilots is sufficient to meet all NASA and Boeing test objectives for CFT, which include demonstrating Starliner’s ability to safely fly operational crewed missions to and from the space station. To protect against unforeseen events with crew transportation to the station, NASA may extend the CFT docked duration up to six months and add an additional astronaut later, if needed.

Offline 1

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 404
  • El Segundo, CA
  • Liked: 956
  • Likes Given: 10
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1412 on: 06/12/2024 11:47 pm »
Mentioned here in NASA's June 2022 update

All true, but I was angling more for the original announcements of such. Turns out, I should have just scrolled down the page a bit in the Starliner section. We had a mini thread about it back in April of 2018. I'd forgotten that those talks had begun even before the uncrewed flights had flown.

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=45464.0

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14437
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 12365
  • Likes Given: 9647
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1413 on: 06/13/2024 02:10 am »
See attachment for Helodriver comment on Maxar WorldView-3 imagery:
https://twitter.com/maxar/status/1801015514698784885

Quote
In-space 📸 of @Boeing Starliner’s first-ever astronaut mission!

Taken June 7, these satellite images show the spacecraft docked to the International Space Station (ISS).

This type of imagery collection, known as non-Earth imaging (NEI), is a breakthrough capability that enables Maxar to support critical space domain awareness missions for government and commercial customers.

Learn more: https://www.maxar.com/maxar-intelligence/products/non-earth-imaging

#satelliteimagery #spacedomainawareness
« Last Edit: 06/13/2024 11:42 pm by zubenelgenubi »
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39696
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33461
  • Likes Given: 9898
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1414 on: 06/13/2024 06:57 am »
This could have saved Columbia. A generation too late.

The US government already had assets in space that could have done that imaging. NASA engineers requested those images, but the request was nixed by a NASA manager.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nasa-official-breaks-her-silence/

Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Vettedrmr

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1804
  • Hot Springs, AR
  • Liked: 2484
  • Likes Given: 3773
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1415 on: 06/13/2024 10:06 am »
https://x.com/maxar/status/1801015514698784885

Quote
In-space 📸 of @Boeing Starliner’s first-ever astronaut mission!

Taken June 7, these satellite images show the spacecraft docked to the International Space Station (ISS).

This type of imagery collection, known as non-Earth imaging (NEI), is a breakthrough capability that enables Maxar to support critical space domain awareness missions for government and commercial customers.

Learn more: https://www.maxar.com/maxar-intelligence/products/non-earth-imaging

#satelliteimagery #spacedomainawareness

I understand this new tech is impressive, and that this thread is about CFT, but this statement is nothing but theatrics.  IMO NOTHING could have saved Columbia; they were in the wrong orbit to dock with ISS, they had no way to repair the damage done to the wing, etc. Not a good look for Maxar.

Now, back to CFT.
« Last Edit: 06/13/2024 12:11 pm by Vettedrmr »
Aviation/space enthusiast, retired control system SW engineer, doesn't know anything!

Offline AstroWare

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
  • Arizona
  • Liked: 234
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1416 on: 06/13/2024 11:54 am »



(...)  Not a good look for Maxar.

Now, back to CFT.

Maxar didn't make the Columbia comment.

Offline Vettedrmr

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1804
  • Hot Springs, AR
  • Liked: 2484
  • Likes Given: 3773
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1417 on: 06/13/2024 12:12 pm »



(...)  Not a good look for Maxar.

Now, back to CFT.

Maxar didn't make the Columbia comment.

Thanks, I've corrected my original post.  The way I read it the author was associated with Maxar.
Aviation/space enthusiast, retired control system SW engineer, doesn't know anything!

Offline crandles57

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 683
  • Sychdyn
  • Liked: 469
  • Likes Given: 145
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1418 on: 06/13/2024 01:09 pm »
Is Starliner going to be safe enough for the two astronauts to come home?  Helium, I assume, pressurizes the hypergolic fuel.  Not enough pressure, thrusters won't operate properly.
Yes.

Quite.

The following seems crazy to me
https://manifold.markets/SteveSokolowski/will-the-boeing-starliner-abort-the#wuy8rc7bnl

Will the Boeing Starliner that launched on June 5 encounter major, mission-changing problems? Currently at 68% has recently hit 84%

I am thinking it should be under 10%.

As well as 1) Helium with 10 time amount needed, there is also:
2) engines but possibly bar 1 the engines are fine just software being picky. The situations not likely to happen on way back and even if it did they could bring them back on-line as previously. Some work to understand issue but they still work
3) One Valve didn't cycle properly. I have seen less about this, is this also a minor issue?

More issues than they would like, perhaps slightly concerning there are so many but I get impression there is still plenty of redundancy to say it is safe to continue with mission.

Should I push the %age down some more?

Edit another couple of markets
https://manifold.markets/Mqrius/will-an-announcement-be-made-before-6wrca85juw?r=TXFyaXVz
Will an announcement be made before 2025 that the Boeing Starliner program will be terminated? Currently 23%
https://manifold.markets/SteveSokolowski/will-an-announcement-be-made-before#1y09ki2rox2i
Will an announcement be made before June 30, 2024 that the Boeing Starliner program will be terminated? Currently 6%
« Last Edit: 06/13/2024 01:20 pm by crandles57 »

Offline cplchanb

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 179
  • Toronto
  • Liked: 106
  • Likes Given: 40
Re: Boeing's Starliner (CST-100) - Discussion Thread 6
« Reply #1419 on: 06/13/2024 02:10 pm »
Did we know there were five?
Prior to Monday's NASA blog post, I thought we only knew of four -- one detected after the May 7 scrub, two more detected on the way to ISS, and one more detected post-docking after the He manifold isolation valves were closed.
We haven't been given any details on the fifth, have we?

Not sure about the 5th, but the fact that there were at least 4 different valves leaking suggests a QA problem with the valve manufacturer, the spacecraft assembly process at Boeing or both.
1 valve leaking is probably an outlier.
2 valves leaking suggests there might be a problem.
4 valves leaking? This is a real problem.

one has to wonder if the QA culture that was bred at the 737 max/787 production lines have drifted to their aerospace division.... very very bad look on Boeing regardless on if its their fault or the suppliers'....

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0