Author Topic: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded  (Read 128676 times)

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57753
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94842
  • Likes Given: 44764
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #60 on: 01/15/2020 05:13 pm »
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1217501246329958400

Quote
Virgin Galactic's stock headed to a new all time high today, up nearly 70% in the past month and now above $15 per share.

$SPCE

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57753
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94842
  • Likes Given: 44764
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #61 on: 01/22/2020 03:00 pm »
I agree with Jeff ...

https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1219995421097058304

Quote
Hard to understand what is driving this.

twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1219993417247268865

Quote
Virgin Galactic shares up over 10% today, hitting a new record high and heading for the 10th consecutive day of gains – up 65% for this month.

$SPCE

Offline M.E.T.

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
  • Liked: 3105
  • Likes Given: 553
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #62 on: 01/27/2020 03:23 am »
I agree with Jeff ...

https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1219995421097058304

Quote
Hard to understand what is driving this.

twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1219993417247268865

Quote
Virgin Galactic shares up over 10% today, hitting a new record high and heading for the 10th consecutive day of gains – up 65% for this month.

$SPCE

Me too. An awful lot of faith in a company that has not achieved anything yet, and in a sector where the competition has achieved a whole lot more.

Could it be desperation by investors to get into the “New Space” industry which has so far been largely inaccessible to them because the main player is a private company?
« Last Edit: 01/27/2020 03:26 am by M.E.T. »

Offline high road

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
  • Europe
  • Liked: 839
  • Likes Given: 152
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #63 on: 01/27/2020 06:47 am »
Combined with a market that is easier to (mis)understand. "Sending people to space" has much more of a ring to it to laypeople than smallsat launchers or the fact that crewed launches make up quite a small fraction of the total number of rockets being launched per year.

Offline ncb1397

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3496
  • Liked: 2310
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #64 on: 01/29/2020 10:04 pm »
An article on Virgin Galactic Holdings stock ownership. 5% institutions, 59% Virgin Group Investments, 8% SCH Sponsor Corp and 5.1% Chamath Palihapitiya.

https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nyse-spce/virgin-galactic-holdings/news/what-kind-of-shareholder-appears-on-the-virgin-galactic-holdings-inc-s-nysespce-shareholder-register/

Only about 24% of the shares held by the public may be actively traded or on the market as something that would likely be traded, which may partly explain the sharp rise in shares. As a stock, it seems to be more high profile than justified by the fundamentals (HSF usually is) and add in the relatively small pool of buy-able shares (supply and demand).

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57753
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94842
  • Likes Given: 44764
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #65 on: 02/14/2020 12:35 pm »
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1228310529262997505

Quote
Shares of Virgin Galactic are up over 4% in premarket trading, set to open at a new all time high. $SPCE

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57753
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94842
  • Likes Given: 44764
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #66 on: 02/19/2020 05:03 pm »
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1230188873373888512

Quote
Virgin Galactic's market value is about to surpass Under Armour's

As of today:
$SPCE $6.5 billion
$UA $6.7 billion

Shares currently trading at $33.75 ...  :o

Offline ZachF

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1885
  • Immensely complex & high risk
  • NH, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 3100
  • Likes Given: 640
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #67 on: 02/19/2020 06:01 pm »
Virgin Galactic being worth ~1/5th that of SpaceX ($6.5b vs $33b) is pretty absurd when you compare what the two companies have actually done... and it's been around as long as SpaceX has.
artist, so take opinions expressed above with a well-rendered grain of salt...
https://www.instagram.com/artzf/

Offline Eric Hedman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2607
  • The birthplace of the solid body electric guitar
  • Liked: 2306
  • Likes Given: 1451
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #68 on: 02/19/2020 06:35 pm »
Virgin Galactic being worth ~1/5th that of SpaceX ($6.5b vs $33b) is pretty absurd when you compare what the two companies have actually done... and it's been around as long as SpaceX has.
The stock market has had many absurdly priced stocks over the years.  Nothing new here.  I remember a company in in 1999 or 2000 that sold clone computers with Linux on it.  The year they went public they had $7 million in sales and a $7 million loss with a market cap on the NASDAQ of $25 billion which was around the same as General Motors market cap at the time.

Offline Nilof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
  • Liked: 594
  • Likes Given: 708
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #69 on: 02/19/2020 10:04 pm »
In most ways I just think that VG is an absurdly bad fit for a publicly traded company if the purpose of running the exchanges is to let the average person invest responsibly. In that sense it'd be much better off being owned by a large mutual fund or conglomerate that shields it from the irrationality of the market.

On the other hand, reaching absurd valuations is good for the company in the sense that they can raise capital easily, and it can establish a new "sector multiple" for valuations of newspace companies. If a P/S ratio of 10 instead of 1 for oldspace & military contractors becomes the normal multiple for newspace, it'd definitely benefit new space startups as a whole by letting them IPO at high multiples so that organisations would be more confident in funding them & getting them running.

Bubbles funded many previous economic revolutions that didn't make a lot of money for their original investors but benefited the economy as a whole because the companies created by those bubbles provided societally useful services (for example, the railway mania). They could definitely fund a new wave of economic activity in space.
For a variable Isp spacecraft running at constant power and constant acceleration, the mass ratio is linear in delta-v.   Δv = ve0(MR-1). Or equivalently: Δv = vef PMF. Also, this is energy-optimal for a fixed delta-v and mass ratio.

Offline ncb1397

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3496
  • Liked: 2310
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #70 on: 02/19/2020 10:15 pm »
Well, the market was right and wrong during the dot com bubble. They were right about the technology and where things broadly were headed, Google and Amazon are primarily internet companies and both are worth over 1 trillion dollars today. Of course, it was hard to predict which companies in the space were going to dominate the sector. Anyways, if you think that "space" is set for crazy growth, just buy the sector. You lose money on VA Linux but you make it back (and then some) somewhere else.
« Last Edit: 02/19/2020 10:18 pm by ncb1397 »

Offline Nilof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
  • Liked: 594
  • Likes Given: 708
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #71 on: 02/20/2020 01:05 am »
Well, the market was right and wrong during the dot com bubble. They were right about the technology and where things broadly were headed, Google and Amazon are primarily internet companies and both are worth over 1 trillion dollars today. Of course, it was hard to predict which companies in the space were going to dominate the sector. Anyways, if you think that "space" is set for crazy growth, just buy the sector. You lose money on VA Linux but you make it back (and then some) somewhere else.

Yes and no. If you just bought the Nasdaq at the top in '00 you would have had to wait until 2015 before breaking even again. If a sector has growth potential but looks bubbly with superexponential growth in stock price, you're likely better off using some kind of momentum strategy to sell or hedge with options if the bubble pops, unless the investment is a very small portion of your total portfolio. Markets are just as much about game theory as they are about the fundamental value of what is being traded.
« Last Edit: 02/20/2020 01:06 am by Nilof »
For a variable Isp spacecraft running at constant power and constant acceleration, the mass ratio is linear in delta-v.   Δv = ve0(MR-1). Or equivalently: Δv = vef PMF. Also, this is energy-optimal for a fixed delta-v and mass ratio.

Offline ncb1397

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3496
  • Liked: 2310
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #72 on: 02/20/2020 01:23 am »
Well, the market was right and wrong during the dot com bubble. They were right about the technology and where things broadly were headed, Google and Amazon are primarily internet companies and both are worth over 1 trillion dollars today. Of course, it was hard to predict which companies in the space were going to dominate the sector. Anyways, if you think that "space" is set for crazy growth, just buy the sector. You lose money on VA Linux but you make it back (and then some) somewhere else.

Yes and no. If you just bought the Nasdaq at the top in '00 you would have had to wait until 2015 before breaking even again. If a sector has growth potential but looks bubbly with superexponential growth in stock price, you're likely better off using some kind of momentum strategy to sell or hedge with options if the bubble pops, unless the investment is a very small portion of your total portfolio. Markets are just as much about game theory as they are about the fundamental value of what is being traded.

Ohh, yeah, if you bought the Nasdaq right at the peak, you got screwed. Well, if you held it to today, your annual return would be 3.5% over a 20 year period (not counting dividends). The Dow Jones Industrial Average over roughly the same period returned 5.5% annually(not counting dividends). But you would have to be pretty unlucky to buy it at the peak.

Offline meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17089
  • N. California
  • Liked: 17319
  • Likes Given: 1493
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #73 on: 02/23/2020 06:50 am »
.. or, use judgement...

VG, if all goes well, will be selling suborbital joy rides at an age where suborbital p2p is around the corner.. 

The novelty will last a few years, in which they'll fly a limited number of times, at a profit margin that isn't astronomical.

If things go well.

ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline ncb1397

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3496
  • Liked: 2310
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #74 on: 02/23/2020 07:29 am »
.. or, use judgement...

VG, if all goes well, will be selling suborbital joy rides at an age where suborbital p2p is around the corner.. 

The novelty will last a few years, in which they'll fly a limited number of times, at a profit margin that isn't astronomical.

If things go well.

Their valuation can't be justified on their current vehicles. Just as SpaceX's valuation couldn't be justified on Falcon 9/Dragon.

Quote
Until Wall Street finally took notice. On Monday, Morgan Stanley started covering Virgin Galactic stock and assigned it an “overweight” rating, saying the space tourism company’s share price could soar as much as 200% from its current level as it carries out a long-term plan to fly regular people into suborbital space and around the world at hypersonic speeds.

“A viable space tourism business is what you pay for today… but a chance to disrupt the multi-trillion-dollar airline [total addressable market] is what is really likely to drive the upside,” Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas, best known for predicting trends in the transportation sector, wrote in a note to investors, CNBC reported.

....
“While some investors have described high-speed hypersonic P2P air travel opportunity as ‘the icing on the cake,’ we see hypersonic as both the cake and the icing, with space tourism as the oven,” Jonas wrote. “The shares feature biotech-type risk/reward where today’s space tourism business serves as a funding strategy and innovation catalyst to incubate enabling tech for the hypersonic P2P (point-to-point) air travel opportunity.”
https://observer.com/2019/12/richard-branson-virgin-galactic-ipo-stock-morgan-stanley-buy-rating/

That is the justification for the valuation, take it or leave it. SpaceShipTwo is involved only in terms of providing credibility that the organization can develop high-mach human transportation systems. And it doesn't help that there are problems with SpaceX's scheme that they are pursuing. The video where a Saturn V-esque vehicle launches off the coast of New York City just didn't make sense.
« Last Edit: 02/23/2020 07:32 am by ncb1397 »

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #75 on: 02/23/2020 12:42 pm »
Very little of SpaceShipTwo technology isn't applicable to long distance  P2P travel. It is bit of dead end technology, won't even scale up to larger suborbital flight vehicles. Blue NS on the other hand is scaleable and has lot of technology that can be used for obital space flight.
« Last Edit: 02/23/2020 12:44 pm by TrevorMonty »

Offline meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17089
  • N. California
  • Liked: 17319
  • Likes Given: 1493
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #76 on: 02/23/2020 03:06 pm »
.. or, use judgement...

VG, if all goes well, will be selling suborbital joy rides at an age where suborbital p2p is around the corner.. 

The novelty will last a few years, in which they'll fly a limited number of times, at a profit margin that isn't astronomical.

If things go well.

Their valuation can't be justified on their current vehicles. Just as SpaceX's valuation couldn't be justified on Falcon 9/Dragon.
I wasn't basing it on their current state, but on an optimistic look at their technology..

SpaceX, if all goes well, will control a planetary economy.  Before that, if all goes well, they will control LEO internet and p2p travel.  (Optimistic view based on their technology)

VG, if l goes well, might have a couple of years of joy rides.

SpaceX's valuation should be much higher, VG should be penny stock.

Keep in mind that VG never went public..  it merged with an already traded company, so they never had to do a roadshow, never convince institutionalized investors of their worth.

Why didn't they just go public?

The Wikipedia entry for VG forgets this fact and uses ambiguous language:

"On Monday 28 October 2019, Virgin Galactic listed into the New York Stock Exchange, trading under the ticker symbol 'SPCE'. Public investors can buy the stock of the company. It is the first and only publicly traded commercial human spaceflight company"

Who is "Social Capital Hedosophia"?
« Last Edit: 02/23/2020 03:42 pm by meekGee »
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline ncb1397

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3496
  • Liked: 2310
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #77 on: 02/23/2020 06:48 pm »
Very little of SpaceShipTwo technology isn't applicable to long distance  P2P travel. It is bit of dead end technology, won't even scale up to larger suborbital flight vehicles. Blue NS on the other hand is scaleable and has lot of technology that can be used for obital space flight.

No, in my mind, the best way to do p2p travel is with a rocket plane that takes off from an airport, diverts miles off the coast, transitions to rocket powered flight, re-enters miles off the coast, then lands at the airport. This is the best way to manage the noise around populated areas and starship can't do it.The sub-sonic phase is way faster than the boat out to the launch pad and doesn't have two boarding and off-boarding phases. WhiteKnightTwo/SpaceShipTwo as a mated unified aircraft is a hybrid rocket powered and air breathing human carrying aircraft.  In addition, it doesn't take massive new infrastructure projects. It is equivalent to what electric cars did with the grid as opposed to building new hydrogen fueling infrastructure. Virgin Galactic's technical approach and existing experience is highly applicable to p2p, possibly better positioned to do p2p travel than SpaceX's current approach that they are communicating to investors and the public. They may need a different propulsion technology, but they can buy that pretty much off the shelf either from Virgin Orbit/Blue Origin/etc.
« Last Edit: 02/23/2020 06:54 pm by ncb1397 »

Offline meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17089
  • N. California
  • Liked: 17319
  • Likes Given: 1493
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #78 on: 02/23/2020 08:39 pm »
Very little of SpaceShipTwo technology isn't applicable to long distance  P2P travel. It is bit of dead end technology, won't even scale up to larger suborbital flight vehicles. Blue NS on the other hand is scaleable and has lot of technology that can be used for obital space flight.

No, in my mind, the best way to do p2p travel is with a rocket plane that takes off from an airport, diverts miles off the coast, transitions to rocket powered flight, re-enters miles off the coast, then lands at the airport. This is the best way to manage the noise around populated areas and starship can't do it.The sub-sonic phase is way faster than the boat out to the launch pad and doesn't have two boarding and off-boarding phases. WhiteKnightTwo/SpaceShipTwo as a mated unified aircraft is a hybrid rocket powered and air breathing human carrying aircraft.  In addition, it doesn't take massive new infrastructure projects. It is equivalent to what electric cars did with the grid as opposed to building new hydrogen fueling infrastructure. Virgin Galactic's technical approach and existing experience is highly applicable to p2p, possibly better positioned to do p2p travel than SpaceX's current approach that they are communicating to investors and the public. They may need a different propulsion technology, but they can buy that pretty much off the shelf either from Virgin Orbit/Blue Origin/etc.
To do significant p2p, you need a high dV and a high velocity re-entry - along the lines of what SS does. (Whether ballistic or atmosphere hopping)

No extrapolation of VG technology does any of that.

SpaceShipTwo has a delta V of like 1.4 km/sec..  I don't know if it can even go from Mojave to LAX...

It carries no heat shield and cannot re-enter at higher speeds..

Flying to the ocean from Mojave using the carrier airplane (and also climbing to launch altitude) takes about the same time as going from LAX to Tokyo with a suborbital rocket..

It's largely a non-starter, and even if it were, VG are one of the last player suitable to trying it.
« Last Edit: 02/23/2020 09:44 pm by meekGee »
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline ncb1397

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3496
  • Liked: 2310
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: Virgin Galactic merger to make it publicly traded
« Reply #79 on: 02/24/2020 12:04 am »
Very little of SpaceShipTwo technology isn't applicable to long distance  P2P travel. It is bit of dead end technology, won't even scale up to larger suborbital flight vehicles. Blue NS on the other hand is scaleable and has lot of technology that can be used for obital space flight.

No, in my mind, the best way to do p2p travel is with a rocket plane that takes off from an airport, diverts miles off the coast, transitions to rocket powered flight, re-enters miles off the coast, then lands at the airport. This is the best way to manage the noise around populated areas and starship can't do it.The sub-sonic phase is way faster than the boat out to the launch pad and doesn't have two boarding and off-boarding phases. WhiteKnightTwo/SpaceShipTwo as a mated unified aircraft is a hybrid rocket powered and air breathing human carrying aircraft.  In addition, it doesn't take massive new infrastructure projects. It is equivalent to what electric cars did with the grid as opposed to building new hydrogen fueling infrastructure. Virgin Galactic's technical approach and existing experience is highly applicable to p2p, possibly better positioned to do p2p travel than SpaceX's current approach that they are communicating to investors and the public. They may need a different propulsion technology, but they can buy that pretty much off the shelf either from Virgin Orbit/Blue Origin/etc.
To do significant p2p, you need a high dV and a high velocity re-entry - along the lines of what SS does. (Whether ballistic or atmosphere hopping)

No extrapolation of VG technology does any of that.

SpaceShipTwo has a delta V of like 1.4 km/sec..  I don't know if it can even go from Mojave to LAX...

It carries no heat shield and cannot re-enter at higher speeds..

Flying to the ocean from Mojave using the carrier airplane (and also climbing to launch altitude) takes about the same time as going from LAX to Tokyo with a suborbital rocket..

It's largely a non-starter, and even if it were, VG are one of the last player suitable to trying it.

What do you think the delta v on Virgin Orbit's rocket is? What is the delta v on New Glenn? What is the delta v on Blue Origin's current vehicle, New Shepard? It is like saying that because New Shepard has 1-2 km/s delta v, New Glenn can't possibly reach orbit. The motor on SpaceShipTwo is very small compared to the vehicle as a whole and is sized that way to do a specific purpose. Any p2p vehicle will have a engine/fuel tank sized to go whatever the range target is. Why wouldn't it? We will see if Virgin makes it to orbit in the next few months, once that is the case, the delta-v limit that you think applies to Virgin but nobody else just goes out the window.

edit: attached schematic of SpaceShipTwo showing relative sizes between propulsion and vehicle. High delta-v rockets are configured differently with the payload being much smaller than the propulsion.
« Last Edit: 02/24/2020 12:19 am by ncb1397 »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0