Author Topic: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)  (Read 1565749 times)

Offline meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17867
  • N. California
  • Liked: 18171
  • Likes Given: 1502
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2640 on: 07/08/2025 06:14 am »
Because Drsgon was so reliable there wasn't urgency in NASA for alternative so they weren't worried about delays with Starliner.

Turns out,  there was/is an unreliable element of the Dragon, just one that isn’t technical.

Now that this problem has been demonstrated, it will be addressed in an appropriate way.
The appropriate way being a twitter fight?
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline Skye

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
  • Wants to start launch company, 14yo, They/Them
  • Britain
  • Liked: 57
  • Likes Given: 60
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2641 on: 07/08/2025 11:34 am »
Because Drsgon was so reliable there wasn't urgency in NASA for alternative so they weren't worried about delays with Starliner.

Turns out,  there was/is an unreliable element of the Dragon, just one that isn’t technical.

You mean like POTUS trying to cancel Dragon contract?


Yes. Quite literally, figuratively, etc. etc., that.
“Now it is clear that anyone working with rocket fuels is outstandingly mad. I don’t mean garden-variety crazy or a merely raving lunatic. I mean a record-shattering exponent of far-out insanity.” - John D. Clark

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4823
  • UK
  • Liked: 6805
  • Likes Given: 1020
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2642 on: 08/04/2025 11:55 pm »
Ars Technica: Is the Dream Chaser space plane ever going to launch into orbit? [Aug 4]

Quote
First mission may not berth with ISS

According to one source, Sierra is considering a modification to its first mission to shorten the certification period.

The company had planned to fly the vehicle close enough to the space station such that it could be captured and berthed to the orbiting laboratory. One option now under consideration is a mission that would bring Dream Chaser close enough to the station to test key elements of the vehicle in flight but not have it berth.

This would increase confidence in the spacecraft's propulsion system and provide the data NASA and partner space agencies need to clear the vehicle to approach and berth with the station on its second flight. However, this would require a modification of the company's contract with NASA, and a final decision has not yet been reached on whether to perform a flyby mission before an actual berthing.

It appears highly unlikely that Dream Chaser will be ready for its debut spaceflight this year for these technical reasons. Another challenge is the availability of its Vulcan launch vehicle. After years of delays, Vulcan is finally due to make its first national security launch as early as this coming Sunday. Assuming this launch is successful, Vulcan has a busy manifest in the coming months for the US Space Force.

Offline vt_hokie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3081
  • Hazlet, NJ
  • Liked: 153
  • Likes Given: 535
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2643 on: 08/05/2025 06:35 pm »
I thought we were home free once it got to Cape Canaveral! Then I started hearing about tow tests and other system tests, and thought, do they really mean with the orbital vehicle that was sent there for final launch preps? Seems there's a long way to go yet and a lot of uncertainty. Would be a shame to get this close and not make it to ISS!

Offline JAFO

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
    • My hobby
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 1226
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2644 on: 08/05/2025 07:58 pm »
We can wait. Do it right.
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

Offline vt_hokie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3081
  • Hazlet, NJ
  • Liked: 153
  • Likes Given: 535
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2645 on: 08/05/2025 08:32 pm »
We can wait.

But not too much longer or there won't be an ISS to service when it gets there!

Offline Tomness

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 777
  • Into the abyss will I run
  • Liked: 355
  • Likes Given: 783
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2646 on: 08/06/2025 02:51 am »
We can wait.

But not too much longer or there won't be an ISS to service when it gets there!

Matters not Destination but the Journey. Axiom, Vast & Blue Reef. Just send it 😆

Offline JAFO

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
    • My hobby
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 1226
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2647 on: 08/29/2025 12:38 am »
from the Dream Chaser Update thread:
1143-EX-ST-2025 & 0459-EX-CR-2025 [Jun 10]

Quote
Requesting to conduct continued EMI testing of the Dream Chaser spacecraft (Call Sign WX9XBF) in order to ensure mission safety and support flight readiness. Additional considerations regarding the EMI testing are also provided on a confidential basis. The rationale for confidential treatment, reproduced herein, is as in file number 0660-EX-ST-2024 (grant call sign WX9XQL) which has a description of the mission to International Space Station which the testing is supporting. Two additional Exhibits are provided in this respect, replacing the Exhibit previously provided with this application.

Operation Start Date: 06/20/2025
Operation End Date: 12/20/2025

This filing was granted on July 29th as is effective from July 24, 2025 to 3AM ET on December 21, 2025.

Another filing (1480-EX-ST-2025) to allow the RALTs (radar altimeters) to be powered and operational during tow/taxi was Denied/Dismissed on August 5th. However it does provide some insight into the tow/taxi tests. The request for for an operational period between September 1, 2025 and March 1, 2026.

Quote
Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Requesting to operate the RALTs on the runway for final integrated and flight like validation of system functionality in order to ensure mission safety and support flight readiness.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:   
The RALTs will be powered and measuring (transmit and receive) while the Uncrewed Dream Chaser (UDC) is on the runway. The RALTS will be powered on while the UDC is stationary, they will stay on as the UDC is towed up to 40 mph by a tow truck and then brought to a safe stop. Once the UDC is stationary again, the RALTS will be powered off before personnel approach and while analysis is performed on the data gathered from the tow. The RALTs will be powered on for less than 1 hour at a time, periodically throughout an 8 hour period (3 cases expected). If additional cases are added, the operation of the RALTs will not change (~1 hour powered period, periodically throughout the day, potentially more than 1 day).

The application was denied due to non-payment of the required filing fee.


In addition to the FCC updates, NASA provided an update during a Crew-11 press conference in response to a Sawyer question.

https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1951341362965586236 [Aug. 1]

Quote
Sawyer Rosenstien (@thenasaman) gained an update on @SierraSpaceCo's Dream Chaser status from ISS Program Manager Dana Weigel today.

"They're working really hard. I think everyone really underestimates what it takes to put together a complex spacecraft. I mean, you're watching it right now with Boeing Starliner, you're watching it with Sierra, but if we remind ourselves on average it takes eight to ten years for a spacecraft to get ready and fly.

"Everybody's hopeful they'll be closer to six, but in reality there are a lot of complexities and you want to get it right. You got to fly when you're ready (via) final certification work.

"Some of the big key areas that they're focused on is the software certification. You've got to test end-to-end all the different software functions. So that's a big focus area for them. And then they're still working on certification in the prop system.

"We still have some of our integrated safety reviews to do, and we're in the process with updating both of our schedules to try to understand where does that really put us. And so Sierra's working on that, and so I need to wait and just get information back from them to see where they think some of that work lines out.

"But we are looking forward to having them flying. They're a berthing vehicle, so that's helpful for us to have dissimilar capabilities in terms of our ports and our logistics.

"So we will be ready for them when they're ready to fly."

Worriesome, at best. Was it a bookkeeping oversight, or deliberate non-payment due to a shortage of funds?
I'm still hopeful and optimistic, still have the Dream Chaser sticker on my toolbox. But I am making that face my dog makes when I'm down to the last bite of steak and still haven't given her any.
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

Offline Tywin

Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2648 on: 09/25/2025 06:47 pm »
Will this free-flight use the module cargo starshooting?

https://twitter.com/SierraSpaceCo/status/1971274959700873501
The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Offline sstli2

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1105
  • Liked: 1387
  • Likes Given: 320
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2649 on: 09/25/2025 07:00 pm »
Wow. Is this as significant as it sounds? It sounds like Sierra Space / Dream Chaser is taking all of the risk here, for the same reward they already were entitled to before. It really seems like they are getting shafted here. Is it due to non-performance?

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
  • Liked: 5390
  • Likes Given: 776
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2650 on: 09/25/2025 07:04 pm »
Will this free-flight use the module cargo starshooting?

https://twitter.com/SierraSpaceCo/status/1971274959700873501
Yes as it is the launch adapter and functions as the service module/orbital module. Dreamchaser only has standalone power capacity for launch and landing. Shooting Star provides everything on orbit.

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4823
  • UK
  • Liked: 6805
  • Likes Given: 1020
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2651 on: 09/25/2025 07:20 pm »
Wow. Is this as significant as it sounds? It sounds like Sierra Space / Dream Chaser is taking all of the risk here, for the same reward they already were entitled to before. It really seems like they are getting shafted here. Is it due to non-performance?

This was proposed as an option last month.

Quote
According to one source, Sierra is considering a modification to its first mission to shorten the certification period.

The company had planned to fly the vehicle close enough to the space station such that it could be captured and berthed to the orbiting laboratory. One option now under consideration is a mission that would bring Dream Chaser close enough to the station to test key elements of the vehicle in flight but not have it berth.

This would increase confidence in the spacecraft's propulsion system and provide the data NASA and partner space agencies need to clear the vehicle to approach and berth with the station on its second flight. However, this would require a modification of the company's contract with NASA, and a final decision has not yet been reached on whether to perform a flyby mission before an actual berthing.
« Last Edit: 09/25/2025 07:20 pm by StraumliBlight »

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 30923
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 24805
  • Likes Given: 14290
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2652 on: 09/25/2025 07:25 pm »
Quote
NSF - NASASpaceflight.com@NASASpaceflight

Not good news on the Dream Chaser front.

"NASA and Sierra Space have mutually agreed to modify the contract as the company determined Dream Chaser development is best served by a free flight demonstration, targeted in late 2026"

[Tony - it would not surprise me that NSF will produce a Breaking News video shortly]

Article:  NASA, Sierra Space Modify Commercial Resupply Services Contract

https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1971276637250650338
« Last Edit: 09/25/2025 07:28 pm by catdlr »
A golden rule from Chris B:  "focus on what is being said, not disparage people who say it."

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 30923
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 24805
  • Likes Given: 14290
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2653 on: 09/25/2025 07:32 pm »
Other comments on Twitter:

Quote
Scott Manley@DJSnM
So I guess it’s downgraded to free flyer?  And much later in 2026

Quote
Felix Space Time@Space_Time3
Not looking good for Dream Chaser…


Quote
Eric Berger@SciGuySpace·
News today: NASA and Sierra Space are unwinding part of their Dream Chaser agreement. It now seems possible the spacecraft never visits the ISS.

« Last Edit: 09/25/2025 07:47 pm by catdlr »
A golden rule from Chris B:  "focus on what is being said, not disparage people who say it."

Offline mn

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1434
  • United States
  • Liked: 1362
  • Likes Given: 559
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2654 on: 09/25/2025 07:41 pm »
Remember when SpaceX convinced NASA to combine COTS 2 and 3 (But then SpaceX did have a COTS 1 flight)

This is the reverse of that, I guess SNC doesn't want to send Dream Chaser to ISS before they do a free flight. Lack of confidence in their own vehicle?
« Last Edit: 09/25/2025 07:42 pm by mn »

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8774
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 3123
  • Likes Given: 2868
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2655 on: 09/25/2025 08:06 pm »
[...]I guess SNC doesn't want to send Dream Chaser to ISS before they do a free flight. Lack of confidence in their own vehicle?

It looks like the parties agreed to decouple the Dream Chaser demo flight from the ISS cargo resupply schedule. That lets Sierra fly their vehicle when its ready, without undue pressure. NASA might make up the cargo short-fall by using a certain other visiting vehicle to carry cargo rather than crew.
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline D_Dom

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 684
  • Liked: 527
  • Likes Given: 156
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2656 on: 09/25/2025 08:16 pm »
from the Dream Chaser Update thread:


Quote
Sawyer Rosenstien (@thenasaman) gained an update on @SierraSpaceCo's Dream Chaser status from ISS Program Manager Dana Weigel today.
...

"Some of the big key areas that they're focused on is the software certification. You've got to test end-to-end all the different software functions. So that's a big focus area for them. And then they're still working on certification in the prop system.

"We still have some of our integrated safety reviews to do, and we're in the process with updating both of our schedules to try to understand where does that really put us. And so Sierra's working on that, and so I need to wait and just get information back from them to see where they think some of that work lines out.

"But we are looking forward to having them flying. They're a berthing vehicle, so that's helpful for us to have dissimilar capabilities in terms of our ports and our logistics.

"So we will be ready for them when they're ready to fly."

I am with you SDSDS, I read it as DreamChaser taking an earlier opportunity to test the complete system less prox-ops with ISS. No doubt prox-ops is a big hurdle to clear. Probably easier to supply adequate documentation if you have on orbit test results for everything else before taking on approach and berthing.


« Last Edit: 09/25/2025 08:18 pm by D_Dom »
Space is not merely a matter of life or death, it is considerably more important than that!

Offline Texl1649

  • Member
  • Posts: 22
  • Liked: 8
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2657 on: 09/25/2025 08:34 pm »
The bigger issue isn’t that it won’t be docking, but the timeline, imho.  I had thought the Vulcan Centaur was the hold up, guess not. 

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 30923
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 24805
  • Likes Given: 14290
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2658 on: 09/25/2025 08:39 pm »
The bigger issue isn’t that it won’t be docking, but the timeline, imho.  I had thought the Vulcan Centaur was the hold up, guess not. 

Well, that's disappointing news.  Maybe there is some assistance they could obtain to secure contracts for supplying AXIOM and/or the VAST space stations.
A golden rule from Chris B:  "focus on what is being said, not disparage people who say it."

Offline JAFO

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
    • My hobby
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 1226
Re: Sierra Space Dream Chaser DISCUSSION Thread (was SNC)
« Reply #2659 on: 09/25/2025 10:13 pm »
She hasn't been cancelled: Good news.
Timeline is moving only a little bit to the right, maybe even a little left: Good news.


I read this as learning from Boeing. Keep the expectations low, the planning conservative. First flight is a trip around the planet, if she makes it back home it's a Win and Wings are Back!!. If there are problems, they're to be expected on the first flight of a new vehicle, they learn from them and make changes. That's why they've paused construction on -102.

OTOH, if they have problems and wave off an ISS approach, it's perceived as a a huge fail.
« Last Edit: 09/25/2025 10:18 pm by JAFO »
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0