Additional applications. We invite additional applications and petitions for declaratory ruling forNGSO-like satellite operation in the 10.7-12.7 GHz, 14.0-14.5 GHz, 17.8-18.6 GHz, 18.8-19.3 GHz,27.5-28.35 GHz, 28.35-29.1 GHz, and 29.5-30.0 GHz frequency bands. Applications and petitions filedby November 15, 2016, will be considered together with the OneWeb Petition. Requests filed after thisdate may not be entitled to shared use of this spectrum with respect to any grant of applications orpetitions filed prior to the cut-off date. Applicants and petitioners that file by the cut-off date will beafforded an opportunity to amend their requests, if necessary, to conform to any requirements or policiesthat may be subsequently adopted concerning NGSO-like satellite operation in these bands.
Boeing’s plan to deploy a constellation of V-band satellites in non-geostationary orbit has prompted at least five companies, including SpaceX and OneWeb, to file me-too proposals with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.The FCC had given companies until March 1 to disclose whether they also had plans to use the same V-band that Boeing had applied for in November of last year.
Anyone interested in the last time this was happening can read this old site:http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/constellations/overview.htmlLet us hope that we are not doomed to repeat history, again.
Quote from: Danderman on 03/04/2017 03:23 amAnyone interested in the last time this was happening can read this old site:http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/constellations/overview.htmlLet us hope that we are not doomed to repeat history, again.I was thinking that things were starting to feel late 90s-ish too. There are some real differences--more traction and progress (and deeper backing) for SpaceX, Blue Origin, and more successful commercial satellite efforts. But also a lot more hype, and lots of money flowing around.My curiosity question is when the bubble pops, what fraction of these companies will have a) already raised enough money to make it to market, and b) be able to make it to stable cashflow positive operations even during an economic downturn, and c) how many spacecraft will actually end up getting launched?Here's to hoping that the number of surviving new constellations is greater than zero, and hopefully in the 2-3 range. Though I'll really be impressed if by 2025 we have more than 3000 spacecraft orbiting earth.~Jon
Albuquerque said FCC approval of the OneWeb constellation “could be granted fairly soon,” but that OneWeb has no special advantage over the 11 other filings that came after it.He said the FCC expected to send to the 11 more-recent filings under the OneWeb procedure a request for supplementary information on their proposals in a matter of days, just as it did with OneWeb.“All the applications in the processing round — OneWeb plus the 11 others — have equal status,” Albuquerque said. “The fact that OneWeb was first doesn’t give it any priority. But most likely action on OneWeb will happen before the others.”
FCC ANNOUNCES TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR THE SEPTEMBER OPEN COMMISSION MEETING--WASHINGTON, September 7, 2017 – Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai announced that the following items are tentatively on the agenda for the September Open Commission Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 26, 2017:...Updating Rules for Non-Geostationary Satellites in the Fixed-Satellite Service – The Commission will consider a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that recommends updating and streamlining the Commission’s rules to facilitate the licensing of the next generation of non-geostationary, fixed-satellite service systems. (IB Docket No. 16-408)
Recent proposals for large constellations of communications satellites have added to the debate surrounding the long-term impact of large satellite constellations on spectrum regulation and orbital debris propagation. The many spectrum license applications currently before the Federal Communications Commission for large, non-geostationary satellite constellation systems provide the satellite risk community with a unique opportunity to weigh the promise of these missions against their long-term impact on the orbital debris environment prior to their launch. The last decade has seen approximately a 60% increase in the total orbital debris object count, and the additional impact of these pending proposals could significantly alter the LEO environment. Furthermore, regulators should examine these proposals within the existing space policy framework to identify potential regulatory inefficiencies. Much of the existing literature focuses on the risk that the orbital environment poses to satellite constellations and distributed spacecraft missions, but the pending constellation requests can serve as case studies for examining the risk that large satellite constellations pose to the orbital environment. Better understanding the proposed systems will offer insight into the risks that mission managers and regulators may be accepting now on behalf the future space community. By examining the licensed OneWeb broadband services satellite constellation and the proposed initial deployment of a similar SpaceX system using the NASA Johnson Space Center Orbital Debris Engineering Model software (Version 3) and a small Monte Carlo analysis, we are able to examine potential implications of the proposed missions, as well as the policy decision space that may emerge as these proposals are reviewed over the coming months and years.
FCC MODERNIZES RULES TO FACILITATE DEPLOYMENT OF NEXT GENERATION SATELLITE SYSTEMSWASHINGTON, September 26, 2017—The Federal Communications Commission today adopted an updated regulatory framework to facilitate the delivery of broadband services through satellite constellations. Today’s action paves the way for greater broadband offerings in the United States, particularly in remote and rural areas.The Commission updated, clarified and streamlined the current rules governing non-geostationary satellite orbit (NGSO) fixed-satellite service (FSS) systems to better reflect current technology and promote additional operational flexibility.Specifically, the Report and Order: Amends the Table of Frequency Allocations to better accommodate NGSO and geostationary satellite operations in the Ka-band (20/30 GHz); Streamlines the NGSO milestone rules for deployment and eliminates the international geographic cover requirements to provide greater flexibility to NGSO FSS operators, and Adopts a new threshold to characterize circumstances where–absent a coordination agreement between operators—a default mechanism will govern spectrum sharing between operators.A Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was also adopted that invites comment on whether to provide satellite operators additional flexibility by allowing innovative new system designs that target particular areas.Action by the Commission September 26, 2017 by Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 17-122). Chairman Pai, Commissioners Clyburn, O’Rielly, Carr and Rosenworcel approving. Chairman Pai, Commissioners Clyburn, O’Rielly and Carr issuing separate statements.IB Docket No. 16-408
STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN AJIT PAIRe: Updates to Parts 2 and 25 Concerning Non-Geostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service Systems and Related Matters, IB Docket No. 16-408.As we strive to close the digital divide, we must be open to any and every technology that could connect consumers across the country. That’s why we once again look to the skies for inspiration—and in particular, to new satellite constellations that offer potential for bridging this gap.Today, the FCC updates the framework that will govern non-geostationary-satellite orbit (NGSO) satellite systems. And it’s high time: It’s been over a decade since we first adopted rules for these types of constellations. In the years since, innovation has brought exciting potential to connect consumers across the nation, especially in rural, remote, and tribal areas. The rules we adopt will promote the next generation of NGSO systems, which could expand broadband access where it’s needed most.I’m also pleased to announce that I have circulated for my colleagues’ consideration orders that would grant U.S. market access to two more NGSO systems in the Ku- and Ka- spectrum bands. This is possible thanks to the International Bureau staff, which has steadily worked to process these and other market access applications for NGSO satellite systems. As I said in June with the FCC’s approval of OneWeb’s application, these satellites could be a gateway to more broadband competition, benefiting consumers.Thank you to all the staff that worked on this item: Jose Albuquerque, Clay DeCell, Chip Fleming, Jennifer Gilsenan, Sankar Persaud, Tom Sullivan, and Troy Tanner from the International Bureau; Bahman Badipour, Michael Ha, Tom Mooring, and Nick Oros from the Office of Engineering and Technology; Stephen Buenzow, Peter Daronco, John Schauble, and Blaise Scinto from the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau; and Deborah Broderson and David Horowitz from the Office of GeneralCounsel.
I would bet on SpaceX StarLink and Telesat LEOVantage constellations as the 2 systems to be approved in the coming weeks by FCC.
Quote from: Mike Jones on 09/26/2017 09:22 pmI would bet on SpaceX StarLink and Telesat LEOVantage constellations as the 2 systems to be approved in the coming weeks by FCC.Are awards made in order submitted, by merit, what criteria is determining?
Paper from AIAA Space 2017Large Satellite Constellation Orbital Debris Impacts: Case Studies of OneWeb and SpaceX Proposalshttps://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdfplus/10.2514/6.2017-5200Quote from: AbstractRecent proposals for large constellations of communications satellites have added to the debate surrounding the long-term impact of large satellite constellations on spectrum regulation and orbital debris propagation. The many spectrum license applications currently before the Federal Communications Commission for large, non-geostationary satellite constellation systems provide the satellite risk community with a unique opportunity to weigh the promise of these missions against their long-term impact on the orbital debris environment prior to their launch. The last decade has seen approximately a 60% increase in the total orbital debris object count, and the additional impact of these pending proposals could significantly alter the LEO environment. Furthermore, regulators should examine these proposals within the existing space policy framework to identify potential regulatory inefficiencies. Much of the existing literature focuses on the risk that the orbital environment poses to satellite constellations and distributed spacecraft missions, but the pending constellation requests can serve as case studies for examining the risk that large satellite constellations pose to the orbital environment. Better understanding the proposed systems will offer insight into the risks that mission managers and regulators may be accepting now on behalf the future space community. By examining the licensed OneWeb broadband services satellite constellation and the proposed initial deployment of a similar SpaceX system using the NASA Johnson Space Center Orbital Debris Engineering Model software (Version 3) and a small Monte Carlo analysis, we are able to examine potential implications of the proposed missions, as well as the policy decision space that may emerge as these proposals are reviewed over the coming months and years.
SpaceX is using an altitude for LEO constellation above most LEO debris(1110-1325km), and VLEO constellation below most debris (335-345km). If you fly between these altitudes, the density of debris climbs rapidly. (Boeing and OneWeb are also in the 1200km dip per reference below.)http://spacenews.com/boeing-proposes-big-satellite-constellations-in-v-and-c-bands/
09/26/2017 IB In the Matter of Space Norway AS Petition for a Declaratory Ruling Granting Access to the U.S. Market for the Arctic Satellite Broadband Mission09/26/2017 IB In the Matter of Telesat Canada Petition for a Declaratory Ruling to Grant Access to the U.S. Market for Telesat Canada's NGSO FSS Constellation
Public Notice from the FCC on the Ku/Ka band processing round. It lists all of the constellation filings accepted so far with their number of satellites, orbits, frequencies, and where they will be licensed. A round of public comments and replies starts on June 26.They also established a cutoff for additional Ku/Ka band NGSO applications to be filed by July 26.The V-band filings are being handled separately from the Ku/Ka band filings, so there should be another of these documents eventually for the rest of the constellation filings.
Nice find. Makes sense, both the Telesat and Space Norway constellations are minuscule relative to all other applicants.
Quote from: vaporcobra on 10/09/2017 08:06 pmNice find. Makes sense, both the Telesat and Space Norway constellations are minuscule relative to all other applicants.The only really big applications are SpaceX, Boeing, OneWeb. Of the rest, isn't Telesat is the biggest? (roughly twice as big as Iridium)
[SpaceNews Nov. 6, 2017] FCC grants Telesat LEO market access despite ViaSat protestsFollowing market approval given to OneWeb in June, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission on Nov. 3 granted global fleet operator Telesat permission to reach the U.S. with a constellation of 117 low-Earth orbit satellites....Canada-based Telesat is the second LEO constellation after OneWeb to receive market access from the United States.The FCC also granted Space Norway market access Nov. 3 to reach the U.S. with two satellites in non-geostationary elliptical orbits. Both Telesat and ViaSat sought to block Space Norway.
Any news regarding FCC ruling for SpaceX constellation ?
If my proposal to grant @SpaceX's application is adopted, it would be the 1st approval given to an American-based company to provide broadband services using a new generation of low-Earth orbit satellites.
we assume that each spacecraft is capable of withstanding an impact by any orbital debris less than 1 centimeter in diameter and that such a collision results in no change in performance of the spacecraft.
Quote from: we assume that each spacecraft is capable of withstanding an impact by any orbital debris less than 1 centimeter in diameter and that such a collision results in no change in performance of the spacecraft.I know of exactly one vehicle -- or rather, one part of one vehicle, for which this statement is true. A 1-centimeter piece of debris is enormous and would be catastrophic for all but very heavily-shielded vehicles.
Quote from: SWGlassPit on 02/14/2018 06:22 pmQuote from: we assume that each spacecraft is capable of withstanding an impact by any orbital debris less than 1 centimeter in diameter and that such a collision results in no change in performance of the spacecraft.I know of exactly one vehicle -- or rather, one part of one vehicle, for which this statement is true. A 1-centimeter piece of debris is enormous and would be catastrophic for all but very heavily-shielded vehicles.Yes, and no.If you consider the whole cross-sectional area of the spacecraft, in most of that cross-sectional area, it's going to hit a solar panel and punch clean through.If the solar panel is appropriately constructed with redundancy, his may cause no meaningful change in performance, most of the time.
I mean this news may be interesting - 10 minutes ago I received mail://Dear valued LeoSat Partner, We very much appreciate your interest and commitment to LeoSat and with this letter I would like to update you on the latest developments.LeoSat as a NewSpace company is confronted with the same challenges of any start-up that is moving along the evolution from vision to reality. Whilst the company maintains its strong vision as a unique solution for B2B data connectivity in LEO, validated by the market and our early investors, we are now facing critical funding issues. Late last week we had to make the very difficult decision to cancel our early obtained FCC license that required a long term financial commitment equal to that of multiple FTEs. As a startup we could no longer justify carrying the cost this early in the project and we will reapply for this license closer to launch, in parallel to obtaining our licenses in other countries. //Starlink will have minus one competitor and more interest from investors
25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this authorization is also subject to the followingrequirements:a. LeoSat must post a surety bond in satisfaction of 47 CFR §§ 25.165(a)(1) & (b) no laterthan December 19, 2018 and thereafter maintain on file a surety bond requiring payment in the event of adefault in an amount, at minimum, determined according to the formula set forth in 47 CFR §25.165(a)(1); andb. LeoSat must launch 50 percent of the maximum number of proposed space stations, placethem in the assigned orbits, and operate them in accordance with the station authorization no later thanNovember 19, 2024 and LeoSat must launch the remaining space stations necessary to complete itsauthorized service constellation, place them in their assigned orbits, and operate each of them inaccordance with the authorization no later than November 19, 2027. 47 CFR § 25.164(b).Failure to post and maintain a surety bond will render this grant null and void automatically,without further Commission action. Failure to meet the milestone requirements of 47 CFR § 25.164(b)may result in LeoSat’s authorization being reduced to the number of satellites in use on the milestonedate. Failure to comply with the milestone requirement of 47 CFR § 25.164(b) will also result inforfeiture of LeoSat’s surety bond. By December 4, 2024, LeoSat must either demonstrate compliancewith its milestone requirement or notify the Commission in writing that the requirement was not met. 47CFR § 25.164(f).
In accordance with Section 25.165 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.165, and paragraph25.a of the Order and Declaratory Ruling1 granting access to the U.S. market to LeoSat MA, Inc.(“LeoSat”) for the operation of a non-geostationary satellite system operating in Ka-bandspectrum, LeoSat hereby submits the attached surety bond rider.The surety bond rider increases the overall bond amount by $20,000 to $1,570,000 which is theamount required to cover the period through and including September 27, 2019 pursuant to theformula set forth in Section 25.165(a)(1) of the Commission’s rules.LeoSat and the surety will execute a further rider to the bond on or before September 27, 2019 to increase the amount of thebond in accordance with the Commission’s requirements.
PARIS — Startup satellite broadband B2B provider LeoSat has suspended operations — which in recent months has mainly consisted of looking for investors — and laid off all its staff in the wake of...
The Boeing constellation filing that must be the one on circulation at the FCC now: SAT-LOA-20170301-00028
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is increasing its Satellite Division staff by 38% to handle the increased number and complexity of satellite network license applications and is determined to open higher-frequency radio spectrum for satellite broadband use, a senior FCC official said March 23.Umair Javed, chief counsel to FFC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel, said the agency’s V-band processing round for non-geostationary-orbit (NGSO) networks, launched in August, has received applications for “more than 38,000 satellites that will offer global broadband.”
Sateliot seeks to become the first satellite operator to offer commercial, satellite-based IoT connectivity under 3GPP NB-IoT NTN protocols. (Sateliot has been the satellite operator with the most contributions to the standard, as an active member of the 3GPP). Sateliot’s 2 GHz MSS/IoT offering will extend mobile network operators (“MNO”) coverage and provide narrowband IoT connectivity to end-user devices.Sateliot’s standards-based approach will enable end-users to purchase devices from any vendor and have access to the Sateliot Smallsat System globally through roaming or similar arrangements between Sateliot and its distribution partners. Sateliot will serve as a wholesale provider of satellite capacity to terrestrial service providers and other distribution partners to cost effectively augment terrestrial IoT coverage to the most remote regions of the United States and the world. Sateliot will have no end-user customers in the United States or elsewhere.Sateliot and Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) have partnered to develop a cloud-based 5G platform designed to support Sateliot’s satellite-based IoT offering. As a precursor to full commercial deployment, Sateliot will operate a constellation of 10 smallsats to facilitate initial introduction and development of its 2GHz MSS/IoT offering. Sateliot expects that its separate petition for declaratory ruling for its full commercial constellation will be processed in accordance with Section 25.157’s modified processing-round procedures along with other non-smallsat proposals to use the 2 GHz MSS band.The implementation of Sateliot’s full 2 GHz MSS IoT constellation will take place over the next five years, and Sateliot intends to file a separate petition for declaratory ruling for its full commercial constellation to serve the U.S. market. Given the significant interest in deploying new 2 GHz MSS systems globally, including for services to the United States, Sateliot anticipates that the petition for declaratory ruling for its full commercial constellation will be subject to the Commission’s modified processing-round procedures for NGSO systems.
