Author Topic: New Glenn 9x4 discussion  (Read 55022 times)

Online Tywin

The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4481
  • UK
  • Liked: 6457
  • Likes Given: 961
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #21 on: 11/20/2025 04:02 pm »
https://x.com/davill/status/1991544049095045367

Getting closer to Saturn V's liftoff thrust:

9 subcooled BE-4s   25,622 kN
5 F-1s33,362 kN



In the reddit thread, NG upgrade's internal name was revealed as "KITSUNE". Someone suggested "Because it's a nine tailed fourx?"



Explicit comparison in this job description:

Quote
We are building a road to space, and a rocket that approximates the size of the Saturn V. The path is long, with challenges at every step of the way.
« Last Edit: 12/30/2025 05:42 pm by StraumliBlight »

Online Tywin

Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #22 on: 11/20/2025 04:03 pm »
Great to see Blue Origin make this official. 

Thrust to weight for the 7x2 should improve closer to 1.3 as a rough guess, perhaps more if the first 2 launches were throttled a bit. 

So these improvements will be phased in starting with NG3.  I'm curious how many of these changes can be incorporated into NG3 if the launch target is Q1.

I'm also curious on the timeline for the 9x4.  Damn that's a big rocket.

So if that's New Steroid Glenn, will there still be a New Armstrong in the future?

YES!! is a beast, New Glenn coming to compete with Everybody!! and be the best rocket...
The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Online SpaceLizard

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 272
  • Liked: 160
  • Likes Given: 2346
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #23 on: 11/20/2025 04:28 pm »
About time Blue showed something genuinely competitive, even if it falls a little short of the leader.
Are those the suggestions of landing legs I see on the second stage? I sure hope so...

Online wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5975
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 3674
  • Likes Given: 4739
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #24 on: 11/20/2025 04:42 pm »
About time Blue showed something genuinely competitive, even if it falls a little short of the leader.
Are those the suggestions of landing legs I see on the second stage? I sure hope so...

1) I think what you suggest as legs on the US are actually the prop lines from the upper tank going around the lower tank.  (Hydrogen and LOx are different enough in temps you won't want them flowing through each other)
2) I love big rockets, however, not every customer flight needs a super heavy lift.  SpaceX and Blue seem to be abandoning the small and medium market for others.
We very much need orbiter missions to Neptune and Uranus.  The cruise will be long, so we best get started.

Offline ZachF

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Immensely complex & high risk
  • NH, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 3154
  • Likes Given: 646
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #25 on: 11/20/2025 04:49 pm »
See, I told you guys NG had an easy path to large performance upgrades.  8)
artist, so take opinions expressed above with a well-rendered grain of salt...
https://www.instagram.com/artzf/

Offline ZachF

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Immensely complex & high risk
  • NH, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 3154
  • Likes Given: 646
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #26 on: 11/20/2025 04:55 pm »
Anyone want to ask Tory Bruno if Vulcan will take advantage of the increased BE-4 thrust (2,847 kN)?

Could be some large cost savings if fewer GEM 63XLs are required ($7 million per solid?).

Good chance Blue will be offering 14 tonnes direct to geo with a cost basis lower than ULA’s cheapest Vulcan…. When Blue and SX start competing on price and the price drifts closer to the cost basis of a semi-reusable LV, it’s joever for expendable LVs.
« Last Edit: 11/20/2025 04:59 pm by ZachF »
artist, so take opinions expressed above with a well-rendered grain of salt...
https://www.instagram.com/artzf/

Online Tywin

Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #27 on: 11/20/2025 04:55 pm »
See, I told you guys NG had an easy path to large performance upgrades.  8)

Me too, I said ;)
The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Online Tywin

Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #28 on: 11/20/2025 04:56 pm »
Anyone want to ask Tory Bruno if Vulcan will take advantage of the increased BE-4 thrust (2,847 kN)?

Could be some large cost savings if fewer GEM 63XLs are required ($7 million per solid?).

Good chance Blue will be offering 14 tonnes direct to geo with a cost basis lower than ULA’s cheapest Vulcan….

Yes and that 70 tons to LEO, could be the price, be lower of 1.000$ per kg?
The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Online SpaceLizard

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 272
  • Liked: 160
  • Likes Given: 2346
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #29 on: 11/20/2025 05:03 pm »
Well if they're not landing legs that will be disappointing. Disposable stages really ought to become a thing of the past and clash badly with Blue's environmentally friendly vision...

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4481
  • UK
  • Liked: 6457
  • Likes Given: 961
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #30 on: 11/20/2025 05:05 pm »
Comparing engine skirts (assuming each pixel is ~0.2-0.206 m):

Quote
New Glenn Section   Pixels   Diameter (m)
Body347
Old skirt42~8.4-8.65
New skirt 50~10-10.3

Using a perspective tool, the new skirt diameter is 10.1 m. Coincidentally the same diameter as a Saturn V...
« Last Edit: 11/20/2025 08:49 pm by StraumliBlight »

Online Rakietwawka2021

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 159
  • Liked: 113
  • Likes Given: 142
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #31 on: 11/20/2025 05:27 pm »
New skirt is 12 wide

Offline hkultala

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1250
  • Liked: 811
  • Likes Given: 1051
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #32 on: 11/20/2025 05:27 pm »
9x4 variant is insane! GS2 in this configuration is effectively just EUS, but mass produced. I can't get over how impressed I am with Blue over the past week.

Each BE-3U engine has ~7-8 times more thrust than each RL-10.

This upper stage is MUCH bigger and MUCH more powerful than EUS.


Online sstli2

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1033
  • New York City
  • Liked: 1282
  • Likes Given: 289
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #33 on: 11/20/2025 05:29 pm »
New skirt is 12 wide

Wouldn't you just move to a larger diameter tank at this point?

Offline lightleviathan

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 622
  • washington dc
  • Liked: 556
  • Likes Given: 192
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #34 on: 11/20/2025 05:29 pm »
9x4 variant is insane! GS2 in this configuration is effectively just EUS, but mass produced. I can't get over how impressed I am with Blue over the past week.

Each BE-3U engine has ~7-8 times more thrust than each RL-10.

This upper stage is MUCH bigger and MUCH more powerful than EUS.

Good point, I lose scale when rockets get this large.

Online DrTadd

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
  • Maryland
  • Liked: 209
  • Likes Given: 33
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #35 on: 11/20/2025 05:38 pm »
New skirt is 12 wide

Wouldn't you just move to a larger diameter tank at this point?

If they keep the current diameter, then they can utilize the current tooling and methods that have been developed, right?

I would think that diameter is more difficult to change than overall length... especially since the domes can keep the current manufacturing method?

Online Tywin

The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Online Tywin

Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #37 on: 11/20/2025 05:45 pm »
« Last Edit: 11/20/2025 05:46 pm by Tywin »
The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Online Brigantine

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 531
  • NZ
  • Liked: 281
  • Likes Given: 709
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #38 on: 11/20/2025 06:28 pm »
making it a market competitor to Starship.
More like a direct competitor to Long March 10, which is also 70 tons to LEO, 27 tons to TLI and in a not too dis-similar stage of development
(maiden launch of the reusable(?) no-boosters version next year)

Online Brigantine

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 531
  • NZ
  • Liked: 281
  • Likes Given: 709
Re: New Glenn 9x4 discussion
« Reply #39 on: 11/20/2025 06:39 pm »
not every customer flight needs a super heavy lift.  SpaceX and Blue seem to be abandoning the small and medium market for others.
Wait for NG with Blue Ring deploying multiple payloads to (moderately?) different orbits in one launch.

Who saw Transporter and Bandwagon coming, before it happened?

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0