Author Topic: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s  (Read 178460 times)

Offline gosnold

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 572
  • Liked: 243
  • Likes Given: 2116
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #20 on: 05/17/2016 08:37 pm »
Interesting. It seems to me that most civilian high-resolution satellites use flat antennas too. If I recall my SAR lessons correctly, it's because antennas that are short in one direction have a higher resolution when doing SAR.

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #21 on: 05/17/2016 08:56 pm »
Like SeaSat...
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15283
  • Liked: 7812
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #22 on: 05/17/2016 09:18 pm »
That SeaSat image is similar to the Agena signals intelligence satellites like MULTIGROUP and STRAWMAN. Pointed down, antennas sticking out the front.


Offline plutogno

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
  • Toulouse, France and Milan, Italy
  • Liked: 240
  • Likes Given: 35
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #23 on: 05/18/2016 11:09 am »
minor correction to Blackstar's article

Quote
The Agena was an all-around workhorse that served both as the second stage for Thor and Agena rockets

you surely meant Thor and Atlas

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #24 on: 05/18/2016 01:40 pm »
I would have loved to see a two stage Agena!
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15390
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8563
  • Likes Given: 1356
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #25 on: 05/18/2016 08:53 pm »
minor correction to Blackstar's article

Quote
The Agena was an all-around workhorse that served both as the second stage for Thor and Agena rockets

you surely meant Thor and Atlas

Brain glitch.

Fixed now. Thanks.

Even after looking at it over five times, I missed that.
Don't forget Titan!  Titan 3B/Agena. 

Maybe a Star motor has flown on top of three different launch vehicles, but I can't think of a liquid stage that pulled the trick except Agena.

 - Ed Kyle

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #26 on: 05/18/2016 09:08 pm »
Centaur came very close... Well if you count Atlas V as a different vehicle, then three, almost four.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15390
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8563
  • Likes Given: 1356
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #27 on: 05/18/2016 09:27 pm »
Centaur came very close... Well if you count Atlas V as a different vehicle, then three, almost four.
Good point.  Balloon tank Atlas.  Solid-boosted Titan.  Common Core Booster Atlas.  That's three basic launch vehicle types.  Vulcan-Centaur will be Number Four, beating Agena's record. 

I was working at KSC when they brought the first Shuttle Centaur into the VPF.  We nearly flew that one.

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 05/18/2016 09:28 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15283
  • Liked: 7812
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #28 on: 05/18/2016 09:51 pm »
Don't forget Titan!  Titan 3B/Agena. 

Maybe a Star motor has flown on top of three different launch vehicles, but I can't think of a liquid stage that pulled the trick except Agena.

I was not trying to be exhaustive.

But Agena was a real workhorse--not only upper stage, but provided power, stabilization and other support for a LOT of different payloads. The information released on the Agena signals intelligence satellites is not very exhaustive, but does indicate that they used gravity gradient stabilization. The Agena pitched over and then stayed that way without any active input. However, later on they discovered that the satellites were nodding slightly, affected by the Earth's magnetic field. It is possible that they had been doing this all along, but the payload accuracy was not high enough for it to show up in the telemetry at first. They corrected the problem with magnets.

Magnets: there's nothing they can't do.
« Last Edit: 05/18/2016 09:51 pm by Blackstar »

Offline PDJennings

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 110
  • Liked: 8
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #29 on: 05/18/2016 09:57 pm »

Maybe a Star motor has flown on top of three different launch vehicles, but I can't think of a liquid stage that pulled the trick except Agena.

 - Ed Kyle

Block D

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15283
  • Liked: 7812
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #30 on: 06/20/2016 10:44 pm »
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/3011/1

The wizard war in orbit (part 1)
Early American signals intelligence satellites

by Dwayne Day
Monday, June 20, 2016


Tales of espionage are filled with lanky men in trenchcoats walking through cold Berlin streets at the height of the Cold War. But the most important intelligence—in terms of volume and reliability—was gathered by reconnaissance satellites far overhead. These satellites were precise, they collected vast amounts of information, and unlike spies, they did not forget, embellish, lie, or go rogue. Photographic reconnaissance satellites like CORONA, GAMBIT, HEXAGON, and KENNEN were in many ways the most prolific spooks. But they were also accompanied by other satellites, signals intelligence, or SIGINT, satellites that listened for the electronic whispers of radars and radios, engaged in a high-tech war of electrons against an enemy that could vanish and emerge at will.

During the Cold War the United States intelligence community gathered signals intelligence from the Soviet Union via a variety of means. These included ground stations, cable-tapping and bugging operations, airborne platforms such as the RC-135 Rivet Joint and RB-47 Stratojet, and signals intelligence satellites. Any history of SIGINT satellite operations during the Cold War is going to be limited in scope because much of the story remains classified, and unlike the reconnaissance photographs, signals intelligence is an arcane and esoteric subject.

In 1998, the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), which develops and operates intelligence satellites, declassified the first signals intelligence satellite named GRAB, which was launched in April 1960. GRAB was developed by the Naval Research Laboratory (NSL) in Washington, DC, and part of the NRL was later subsumed as a component of the super-secret NRO. In 2007 the NRO declassified the follow-on to GRAB, named POPPY. But both of these declassification actions were limited, leaving out many major details such as the appearance of some of the satellites, the variety and types of signals they collected, and even how long they operated. The NRO released further details in dribs and drabs over the next several years, but GRAB and POPPY operations remained shrouded in a certain amount of mystery and confusion. But while the GRAB and POPPY revelations were significant, the reality was that they represented only a small part of the story. Throughout the 1960s the NRO operated many other SIGINT satellites and platforms, most developed by the US Air Force, and these remained shrouded in secrecy. Until now.

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #31 on: 06/21/2016 05:45 pm »
I really enjoyed the article. Thanks
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13995
  • UK
  • Liked: 3971
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #32 on: 06/21/2016 05:46 pm »
Was a good one. Thanks Blackstar.

Offline gwiz

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 602
  • Cornwall
  • Liked: 143
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #33 on: 06/21/2016 05:52 pm »
Ditto, looking forward to the rest of the series.

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #34 on: 06/21/2016 06:01 pm »
I think I'm most looking forward to part five ;)
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13995
  • UK
  • Liked: 3971
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #35 on: 06/21/2016 06:40 pm »
I still keep hoping they'll declassify something about the first generation of NOSS satellites as they are something of an enigma.

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15283
  • Liked: 7812
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #36 on: 06/21/2016 07:26 pm »
I still keep hoping they'll declassify something about the first generation of NOSS satellites as they are something of an enigma.

I have more info leading into their development and what they were trying to do.

I'm much more interested in JUMPSEAT. I have info on that, but I'd really like to get the detailed story.

Offline Hobbes-22

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 941
  • Acme Engineering
    • Acme Engineering
  • Liked: 586
  • Likes Given: 485
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #37 on: 06/21/2016 07:32 pm »
Interesting. It seems to me that most civilian high-resolution satellites use flat antennas too. If I recall my SAR lessons correctly, it's because antennas that are short in one direction have a higher resolution when doing SAR.

You may be conflating two things:
Classical reflector (parabolic section) antennas are often short in one direction. On Earth, that can be useful for a search radar: your radar beam is narrow but high, covering all altitudes at once, but giving good resolution in the horizontal direction. 

When you use a phased array, all that no longer applies. You control the beam by coordinating the transmission of each element, using all or part of the array as you wish. Square or rectangular is no longer an issue.

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #38 on: 06/21/2016 09:23 pm »
You may be conflating two things:
Classical reflector (parabolic section) antennas are often short in one direction. On Earth, that can be useful for a search radar: your radar beam is narrow but high, covering all altitudes at once, but giving good resolution in the horizontal direction. 

When you use a phased array, all that no longer applies. You control the beam by coordinating the transmission of each element, using all or part of the array as you wish. Square or rectangular is no longer an issue.
That's not what I remember from my college Microwave Antenna design course. But it's been decades. For a phased array all elements are radiating and you steer the beam through constructive and destructive phase interference. It is the phase (Delay) of each element that you control to steer the beam/pulse. As far as square and rectangular go, the dimensions of the array have a large effect on the shape and compactness of the beam. That said, I'm not a microwave engineer, and the elder Bush was president the last time I looked at it... 
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15283
  • Liked: 7812
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s
« Reply #39 on: 06/22/2016 12:38 am »
The title of this thread is "Satellite signals intelligence in the 1960s" and yet for some odd reason over half of the posts here seem to be about synthetic aperture radar.


Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1