In your opinion, how many people who worked at McDonnell Douglas, Boeing, and ULA on manufacturing components for the Delta II and Delta III rockets are still employed by ULA, given that the Delta II and Delta III were retired years ago and only two Delta IV Heavy launches are left (not to mention that the single-stick Delta IV variants were retired in 2019)?
In your opinion, how many people who worked at McDonnell Douglas, Boeing, and ULA on components for the Delta II and Delta III rockets are still employed by ULA, given that the Delta II and Delta III were retired years ago and only two Delta IV Heavy launches are left (not to mention that the single-stick Delta IV variants were retired in 2019)?
Quote from: Vahe231991 on 04/06/2023 04:09 pmIn your opinion, how many people who worked at McDonnell Douglas, Boeing, and ULA on components for the Delta II and Delta III rockets are still employed by ULA, given that the Delta II and Delta III were retired years ago and only two Delta IV Heavy launches are left (not to mention that the single-stick Delta IV variants were retired in 2019)?This is nonsense question because the answer is meaningless. 0. The change from McDonnell Douglas to Boeing was only a badge change. No change in personnel.1. Delta III was canceled before ULA was formed 2. Delta management was moved from Huntington Beach to the Denver area when ULA was formed.3. Delta II production was moved from Huntington Beach and Pueblo, CO to the Decatur area when ULA was formed.4. Atlas management was moved from San Diego to the Denver area when LM bought GD aerospace in the 90's5. Atlas production was moved from San Diego to the Denver area when LM bought GD aerospace in the 90's6. Atlas production was moved from Denver area to Decatur when ULA was formed.7. Centaur tank production was moved from San Diego area to Decatur when ULA was formed.Once ULA was formed, Atlas and Delta were only kept separate at the program office level. Employees and groups with the same jobs/tasks (structural analysts, thermal analyst, electrical engineers, etc) were combined. Production technicians groups were combine. Launch site pooled employees and most worked both systems.There was some launch site employees that retired with the last east coast Delta II launch but most stayed with ULA because they could work the other vehicles.So as far as the percent of who worked on Delta production at McDonnell Douglas and Boeing and still are with ULA is likely higher than percent of who worked on Atlas production at GD and LM and still are with ULA because Atlas moved twice and ended up at the Delta IV factory.
To partly rephrase my question, since I'm aware that the last launch of the Delta III program occurred six years before ULA was formed, I meant to weigh in on your opinion on what proportion of former employees for the Delta III program were transferred to the Atlas V and Delta II programs prior to ULA's formation but also are still employed by ULA.