Author Topic: White Graphene  (Read 9115 times)

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39691
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33457
  • Likes Given: 9874
White Graphene
« on: 05/17/2023 06:03 am »
A company from Queensland, Australia is producing a new material called White Graphene. It made from a lattice of Boron and Nitrogen, with a specific strength that is 552 times greater than 304 stainless steel. It is also impermeable to hydrogen. If they can make fibres of this stuff, Arthur C. Clarke's dream of a Skyhook from geostationary orbit may become a reality.

https://www.white-graphene.com/about/about-us

The company will receive AU$100,000 to further develop the technology for space applications.

https://www.spaceconnectonline.com.au/industry/5889-boeing-selects-local-startup-to-advance-nanomaterial-proof-of-concept

"The Queensland-based company will receive up to $100,000, having successfully pitched their nanomaterial solutions during the program, topping the six-team competition.

The nanomaterial developed by the company is described as four times lighter and 138 times stronger than steel."
« Last Edit: 05/17/2023 06:06 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Online edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6832
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 10450
  • Likes Given: 48
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #1 on: 05/17/2023 07:17 am »
Whilst Boron Nitride nanosheets have some interesting fracture behaviour (cracks propagate far less readily than in Graphene) whilst being only a bit weaker overall (~20%), you are still faced with the same challenges as with carbon nanosheet or nanotube tethers: manufacturing massive quantities of defect-free bulk material, and keeping that material defect free (radiation exposure, micrometeoroids, etc) when deployed. And the mechanics of deployment of the tether.

Offline Elmar Moelzer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3675
  • Liked: 858
  • Likes Given: 1079
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #2 on: 05/17/2023 12:24 pm »
A company from Queensland, Australia is producing a new material called White Graphene. It made from a lattice of Boron and Nitrogen, with a specific strength that is 552 times greater than 304 stainless steel. It is also impermeable to hydrogen. If they can make fibres of this stuff, Arthur C. Clarke's dream of a Skyhook from geostationary orbit may become a reality.

https://www.white-graphene.com/about/about-us

The company will receive AU$100,000 to further develop the technology for space applications.

https://www.spaceconnectonline.com.au/industry/5889-boeing-selects-local-startup-to-advance-nanomaterial-proof-of-concept

"The Queensland-based company will receive up to $100,000, having successfully pitched their nanomaterial solutions during the program, topping the six-team competition.

The nanomaterial developed by the company is described as four times lighter and 138 times stronger than steel."
Very interesting!
Wonder how it reacts to different and varying temperatures.

Offline rfdesigner

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 103
  • Radio Electronics R&D Engineer
  • insignificant little blue green planet, small unregarded yellow sun, unfashionable western spiral arm. ZZ9 PluralZ Alpha
  • Liked: 115
  • Likes Given: 302
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #3 on: 05/17/2023 12:40 pm »
My instant reaction is, thermal properties?...  at cryogenic temperatures?

(fuel tanks)
Please Don't Swear:  Easy, Only, Just and Free are all 4 letter words, best not to use them.  😉

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6188
  • Liked: 1416
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #4 on: 05/18/2023 02:28 am »
What is the production method for White Graphene? Is it CVD?

I remember reading about BN nanotubes a couple of decades ago, and the production method used was ball milling.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39454
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25565
  • Likes Given: 12232
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #5 on: 05/18/2023 04:26 am »
BN nanosheets aren't new at this point.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline redneck

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • swamp in Florida
  • Liked: 199
  • Likes Given: 159
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #6 on: 05/18/2023 08:51 am »
My instant reaction is, thermal properties?...  at cryogenic temperatures?

(fuel tanks)

Fuel tanks, engines, shrouds.....

Ultimately leading to feasible SSTO? 10% hardware fraction divided by the 552 times strength? Not that I think it works like that, but it's fun to think about vehicles that are 0.02% hardware and 95% propellant.

Offline Barley

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1123
  • Liked: 786
  • Likes Given: 441
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #7 on: 05/18/2023 01:32 pm »

Ultimately leading to feasible SSTO?

Ultimately leading to a really good TSTO.

Offline redneck

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • swamp in Florida
  • Liked: 199
  • Likes Given: 159
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #8 on: 05/18/2023 02:16 pm »

Ultimately leading to feasible SSTO?

Ultimately leading to a really good TSTO.

If hardware on 1M GLOW is 200 pounds in this fantasy, then going tsto might not be the best move.  Of course with normal materials SSTO doesn’t work well. 

Offline InterestedEngineer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2744
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2124
  • Likes Given: 3475
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #9 on: 05/18/2023 02:53 pm »

Ultimately leading to feasible SSTO?

Ultimately leading to a really good TSTO.

Imagine three Raptor3 engines with mass 3x2 = Mass 6t.   Payload 20t.  Misc (such as fairing, thrust plate, etc) 4t.

Mass ratio for 9.5km/sec is 15.   30t dry mass. 

Start with 450t of fuel before fuel tankage required.

Stainless fuel tankage is 1.5t per 100t fuel.   Let's say we drop that to 1t per 100t with magic white graphene.

450t of fuel takes 4.5t of tankage which takes 67.5t of fuel which takes .675t of tankage.

so net say 6t of tankage.   

Total dry mass is 36t.  550t of fuel (3t leftover for landing).

TWR wet is 1.3, which is too little.   The gravity losses are going to be more than the model above allows.

TWR dry is (1 engine 30% throtle) 2:1.  Which is too much.

No engine redundancy.    550t of fuel to 20t payload = 27.5t fuel/1t payload.

Now take TSTO Starship system w/ Raptor3.  4830t of fuel per 200t of payload = 24t fuel/1t payload.

TSTO is more fuel efficient and has redundancy.




Offline redneck

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • swamp in Florida
  • Liked: 199
  • Likes Given: 159
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #10 on: 05/18/2023 04:14 pm »

Ultimately leading to feasible SSTO?

Ultimately leading to a really good TSTO.

Imagine three Raptor3 engines with mass 3x2 = Mass 6t.   Payload 20t.  Misc (such as fairing, thrust plate, etc) 4t.

Mass ratio for 9.5km/sec is 15.   30t dry mass. 

Start with 450t of fuel before fuel tankage required.

Stainless fuel tankage is 1.5t per 100t fuel.   Let's say we drop that to 1t per 100t with magic white graphene.

450t of fuel takes 4.5t of tankage which takes 67.5t of fuel which takes .675t of tankage.

so net say 6t of tankage.   

Total dry mass is 36t.  550t of fuel (3t leftover for landing).

TWR wet is 1.3, which is too little.   The gravity losses are going to be more than the model above allows.

TWR dry is (1 engine 30% throtle) 2:1.  Which is too much.

No engine redundancy.    550t of fuel to 20t payload = 27.5t fuel/1t payload.

Now take TSTO Starship system w/ Raptor3.  4830t of fuel per 200t of payload = 24t fuel/1t payload.

TSTO is more fuel efficient and has redundancy.

You are using realistic numbers.  The premise here is that the magical graphene has a 500 times advantage.  So the Raptors would weigh about 4 pounds each and the tankage would be abou 3 pounds per hundred tons of propellant.   

Evening edit on a real keyboard instead of phone.  Messed up a couple of numbers.  Your 30 ton dry mass with normal materials would be 60 kg of the magical graphene to do the same job. So the 30 tons would be almost all payload in either SSTO or TSTO as there is little mass to drop.

Actually it is nearly impossible that a 552 to 1 reduction could be achieved, especially in all components.  The white graphine may reduce certain components by a useful margin. That margin is unlikely to be enough to change the advantage that is the reality of TSTO.
« Last Edit: 05/18/2023 10:36 pm by redneck »

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6188
  • Liked: 1416
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #11 on: 05/19/2023 03:33 am »

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6188
  • Liked: 1416
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #12 on: 05/19/2023 08:04 am »
My instant reaction is, thermal properties?...  at cryogenic temperatures?

(fuel tanks)

One thing I remember is that boron nitride is more stable against oxidation. Here's a NASA video from 10 years ago, which talks about using BN nanotubes for space applications, including as TPS for re-entry vehicles:



(this was just before planar graphene-style monomolecular layers were found to be more useful than nanotubes)
« Last Edit: 05/19/2023 08:05 am by sanman »

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39454
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25565
  • Likes Given: 12232
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #13 on: 05/19/2023 12:54 pm »
“(this was just before planar graphene-style monomolecular layers were found to be more useful than nanotubes)”
…err, this isn’t really true…

It’s just the hype cycle. Tubes are literally just rolled up planar sheets.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10455
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2499
  • Likes Given: 13796
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #14 on: 05/20/2023 06:08 pm »
A company from Queensland, Australia is producing a new material called White Graphene.
Not actually a new material.

And not anything to do with graphene either.

I guess they are going with the parallel of carbon fibre as "Black aluminum"

Usual problems with all "new" materials.
1) Economic mfg process?
2) very limited knowledgebase. OK it's super-duper capatilities at room temperature. Now, what's it like at 500c? 1000c? And of course what's it like in an oxidising atmosphere (like the one humans breath)?

This sort of material crys out for mechanochemical assembly. I just wish people would stop saying how it's impossible to build a Drexlerian "Assembler" (refuted by every ribosome in the human body) and get on and build one (or rather a plate with a billion of them on it)   :(
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6188
  • Liked: 1416
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #15 on: 05/20/2023 08:56 pm »
“(this was just before planar graphene-style monomolecular layers were found to be more useful than nanotubes)”
…err, this isn’t really true…

It’s just the hype cycle. Tubes are literally just rolled up planar sheets.

Well, the planar sheets were found to be more manipulable and easier to work with. Trying to do practical stuff with the tubes seems to be harder. Besides, there's a binding energy required to maintain the tube shape, unlike the flatter sheets. The sheets are more stable.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39454
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25565
  • Likes Given: 12232
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #16 on: 05/20/2023 09:07 pm »
“(this was just before planar graphene-style monomolecular layers were found to be more useful than nanotubes)”
…err, this isn’t really true…

It’s just the hype cycle. Tubes are literally just rolled up planar sheets.

Well, the planar sheets were found to be more manipulable and easier to work with. Trying to do practical stuff with the tubes seems to be harder. Besides, there's a binding energy required to maintain the tube shape, unlike the flatter sheets. The sheets are more stable.
Not in my experience. The CNT yarns are stronger than any graphene fibers I’ve seen, and in practical terms the tubes tend to be so big that they stack like flat sheets anyway, like wet manicotti.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Seamurda

  • Member
  • Posts: 73
  • UK
  • Liked: 45
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #17 on: 05/28/2023 01:57 pm »

Ultimately leading to feasible SSTO?

Ultimately leading to a really good TSTO.

Imagine three Raptor3 engines with mass 3x2 = Mass 6t.   Payload 20t.  Misc (such as fairing, thrust plate, etc) 4t.

Mass ratio for 9.5km/sec is 15.   30t dry mass. 

Start with 450t of fuel before fuel tankage required.

Stainless fuel tankage is 1.5t per 100t fuel.   Let's say we drop that to 1t per 100t with magic white graphene.

450t of fuel takes 4.5t of tankage which takes 67.5t of fuel which takes .675t of tankage.

so net say 6t of tankage.   

Total dry mass is 36t.  550t of fuel (3t leftover for landing).

TWR wet is 1.3, which is too little.   The gravity losses are going to be more than the model above allows.

TWR dry is (1 engine 30% throtle) 2:1.  Which is too much.

No engine redundancy.    550t of fuel to 20t payload = 27.5t fuel/1t payload.

Now take TSTO Starship system w/ Raptor3.  4830t of fuel per 200t of payload = 24t fuel/1t payload.

TSTO is more fuel efficient and has redundancy.

You are using realistic numbers.  The premise here is that the magical graphene has a 500 times advantage.  So the Raptors would weigh about 4 pounds each and the tankage would be abou 3 pounds per hundred tons of propellant.   

Evening edit on a real keyboard instead of phone.  Messed up a couple of numbers.  Your 30 ton dry mass with normal materials would be 60 kg of the magical graphene to do the same job. So the 30 tons would be almost all payload in either SSTO or TSTO as there is little mass to drop.

Actually it is nearly impossible that a 552 to 1 reduction could be achieved, especially in all components.  The white graphine may reduce certain components by a useful margin. That margin is unlikely to be enough to change the advantage that is the reality of TSTO.

Calculations like this are very mode dependant.

NASA/Boeing did some interesting work with "cheating" SSTOs in the early 80's like air launch and ground accelerator launched HTHLs. They could fit example take off with less than 1/1 thrust ratios.

Conclusion of that work was that fairly minor decreases in structural mass may make an "SSTO" more economical as you need fewer engines, fewer vehicles and your very "fluffy" upper stage re-enters higher and thus can get by with hot structure heat shielding.

Only issue with such a vessel is probably that BN nanotubes probably won't be that much of a help to it unless you can use them in a metal matrix composite.

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1687
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 464
  • Likes Given: 199
Re: White Graphene
« Reply #18 on: 07/19/2023 08:53 pm »
I just read that graphene has been explored as a building material to improve the performance of solar sails. In your opinion, would white graphene be able to enhance a solar sail's performance if it were used in the construction of solar sails?

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1