The refuelling hardware on the Restore-L are government furnished equipment. Are they a copy of the equipment attached to the ISS's Dextre? Or something from the Department of Defence?
Quote from: A_M_Swallow on 06/17/2015 04:54 amThe refuelling hardware on the Restore-L are government furnished equipment. Are they a copy of the equipment attached to the ISS's Dextre? Or something from the Department of Defense?The people in charge of this are the people doing the experiments on ISS, so it's probably pretty similar to that.
The refuelling hardware on the Restore-L are government furnished equipment. Are they a copy of the equipment attached to the ISS's Dextre? Or something from the Department of Defense?
Collectspace's similar article says that Landsat 7, which was launched in April 1999 atop a Delta II, will be refueled by Restore-L in 2020.http://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum33/HTML/000661.html
Quote from: ZachS09 on 12/06/2016 03:09 pmCollectspace's similar article says that Landsat 7, which was launched in April 1999 atop a Delta II, will be refueled by Restore-L in 2020.http://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum33/HTML/000661.htmlAn interesting, indirect connection, IIRC:One of the Vandenberg Shuttle flights was to be a refueling of Landsat 4 or 5. They were constructed with larger than otherwise needed propellant tanks so it would have sufficient propellant to lower its orbit prior to the Shuttle rendezvousing with it.
FISO presentation on sat servicing, including restore-L:http://spirit.as.utexas.edu/%7Efiso/telecon/Reed_1-11-17/
I'm kinda disappointed they didn't go with the name Restore-R
Quote from: Hobbes-22 on 01/14/2017 07:28 pmI'm kinda disappointed they didn't go with the name Restore-R Isn't the L for "LandSat" the satellite they're targeting for servicing?~Jon
Why refuel satellites? Why not let the "Restore-L" instead tug the satellite with its own engine? It should be much easier and safer and one doesn't need to care about what fuel type the satellite originally had.
Quote from: TakeOff on 01/18/2017 06:54 amWhy refuel satellites? Why not let the "Restore-L" instead tug the satellite with its own engine? It should be much easier and safer and one doesn't need to care about what fuel type the satellite originally had.Because a "tug" isn't needed. No "engine" is need. The propellant is for attitude control. Attaching another spacecraft is not that simple. The mass properties of the stack is different. The attached spacecraft would interfere with look angles of sensors and instruments. It would require sending commands to two spacecraft to point and take data.