Author Topic: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher  (Read 738528 times)

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8485
  • Likes Given: 5384
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #140 on: 03/05/2015 12:06 am »
After three launches in 60 days?  ::)  I think it is a MUCH safer bet that all the business plans of these small-sat launcher startups aren't worth the paper they are printed on.

None of them launched on time.. and it still takes three years to get on the manifest.

But that wasn't what your "bet" was about. Nonetheless I look forward to seeing the launch frequency (& timeliness!) of these small sat players, if they ever fly.

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9238
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4477
  • Likes Given: 1108
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #141 on: 03/05/2015 12:17 am »
Nonetheless I look forward to seeing the launch frequency (& timeliness!) of these small sat players, if they ever fly.

Me too. It makes sense that a smaller vehicle in mass production should be more responsive, but there's no guarantees.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline Impaler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1283
  • South Hill, Virgina
  • Liked: 372
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #142 on: 03/05/2015 02:14 am »
If the 'dispenser' system on conventional size rockets works and becomes the norm then it really resolves the whole 'hitching a ride' problem for the small stat and leaves no advantage is 'booking time' and flexibility for the small rocket.  Rather then directly approaching and negotiating with the launch provider to effectively bum a ride, they book with the dispenser provider which dose the interface with the launch provider AS a full fledged customer of the launch provider, that is going to get you a lot more clout and a lot lower chance of getting bumped in time or dumped into some undesirable orbit.

Now the small sat maker is arguably in a better position then the manufacturer of a whole launch vehicle using traditional satellite, because they can jump in at virtually the last minute if their is still room in the dispenser systems manifest and assuming the dispenser launches regularly enough they get to orbit is less lead-time on average.  It's like the difference in lead time between booking a whole plane vs buying a single ticket at the airport.

P.S.  I found it really nutting that they claim launching small sats and creating small sat constellations is what will lead to space-colonization.  By definition these small launch vehicles are incapable of being used in manned space flight even to LEO (a human rated capsule for 1 person exceeds their launch capability), their is no way they can colonize anything with this tech even if they had thousands of them and they were fully reusable.

Offline ChrisWilson68

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5266
  • Sunnyvale, CA
  • Liked: 4992
  • Likes Given: 6459
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #143 on: 03/05/2015 02:42 am »
P.S.  I found it really nutting that they claim launching small sats and creating small sat constellations is what will lead to space-colonization.  By definition these small launch vehicles are incapable of being used in manned space flight even to LEO (a human rated capsule for 1 person exceeds their launch capability), their is no way they can colonize anything with this tech even if they had thousands of them and they were fully reusable.

Maybe they meant colonization by ants. :-)

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9238
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4477
  • Likes Given: 1108
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #144 on: 03/05/2015 02:48 am »
P.S.  I found it really nutting that they claim launching small sats and creating small sat constellations is what will lead to space-colonization.  By definition these small launch vehicles are incapable of being used in manned space flight even to LEO (a human rated capsule for 1 person exceeds their launch capability), their is no way they can colonize anything with this tech even if they had thousands of them and they were fully reusable.

It takes thousands of companies to make an industry. Currently there's very few actually operating anything in space. Their argument is that they can help increase that number. Whether they can actually do that or not is the question.

It's important to remember that some of us still think space will be colonized by humanity, not just Elon Musk.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #145 on: 03/05/2015 02:57 am »
If these small LVs can achieve the high flight rates that Firefly and Rocketlab are talking about then expect them to keep innovating and drive launches prices down while advancing LV technology.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39270
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25240
  • Likes Given: 12115
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #146 on: 03/05/2015 03:09 am »
It's worth noting that Firefly's payload market is an order of magnitude above RocketLab's 110kg.

RocketLab is to Firefly as Firefly is to SpaceX's F9R.

I'm not sure $5m is cheap enough for such a tiny payload.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14158
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14046
  • Likes Given: 1392
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #147 on: 03/05/2015 04:08 am »
Paper rockets always launch on time, and are 100% reliable.

3 years manifest has nothing to do with the size of the rocket.  Why would a smaller rocket company that's wildly successful have a shorter waiting list?

Or if there's no waiting list - how well does that bode to the business plan?

---

Anyway, 1 ton and $5M puts FF in the same category as Launcher One.    For context, consider Weiler's 700 satellite constellation.   Should they be launched, one by one, using Launcher One?  What's the total cost there?   And will they launch one per day for two years?

ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39270
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25240
  • Likes Given: 12115
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #148 on: 03/05/2015 04:13 am »
The cost of Firefly's vehicles is supposed to be $8-9 million, but that's for a ~1 ton payload.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9238
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4477
  • Likes Given: 1108
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #149 on: 03/05/2015 04:19 am »
3 years manifest has nothing to do with the size of the rocket.

Yeah, it does. Not only can you find more payloads (and not have to wait until multiple smaller payloads come together) you can also turn around the pad faster for a smaller vehicle. You need less operations staff, less complicated logistics to get the rocket to the pad, off-the-shelf logistics to get the payload to the rocket, etc, etc. The advantage of scale works both ways, they're just different advantages :)
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #150 on: 03/05/2015 04:21 am »
The cost of Firefly's vehicles is supposed to be $8-9 million, but that's for a ~1 ton payload.
Actually Alpha is 400kg to LEO, Electron is 110kg to SS.

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14158
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14046
  • Likes Given: 1392
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #151 on: 03/05/2015 06:40 am »
3 years manifest has nothing to do with the size of the rocket.

Yeah, it does. Not only can you find more payloads (and not have to wait until multiple smaller payloads come together) you can also turn around the pad faster for a smaller vehicle. You need less operations staff, less complicated logistics to get the rocket to the pad, off-the-shelf logistics to get the payload to the rocket, etc, etc. The advantage of scale works both ways, they're just different advantages :)

I don't agree. 

"Waiting for payloads to come together" is only relevant if each customer only wants to launch one.  That's the fallacy.

Mini satellites work in constellations.  Every customer wants to launch a large quantity of them.   Basing your plan on "one-each" means that you will only have as many mini-launches as there are customers (for prototyping, perhaps) and then of course you'll be able to provide a rocket right away, since your manifest will be rock empty....

The idea of serving a market that wants unplanned launches right away - I don't see that market yet.  It takes time to develop hardware, and so customers can sign up a couple of years in advance.

We'll see.  I think the mini-launchers companies are in bubble mode.  It doesn't add up financially, it just sounds good in relation to mini-sats. 
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9238
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4477
  • Likes Given: 1108
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #152 on: 03/05/2015 07:10 am »
That's the fallacy.

There's more of them than constellations.

Quote from: meekGee
Mini satellites work in constellations.  Every customer wants to launch a large quantity of them.

No. Not at all.
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #153 on: 03/05/2015 07:23 am »
Here is another article on small LVs. They say Firefly Alpha sun synchronous payload is 210kg, if is so then the per kg to orbit is similar to Electron. ie $5m for 110kg compared to $8m for 210kg.

http://seradata.com/SSI/2014/06/uk-launch-symposium-patriotic-rocket-scientists-want-to-put-britain-back-into-launch-business-but-know-that-affordability-is-the-key/

Offline ChrisWilson68

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5266
  • Sunnyvale, CA
  • Liked: 4992
  • Likes Given: 6459
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #154 on: 03/05/2015 08:25 am »
Here is another article on small LVs. They say Firefly Alpha sun synchronous payload is 210kg, if is so then the per kg to orbit is similar to Electron. ie $5m for 110kg compared to $8m for 210kg.

http://seradata.com/SSI/2014/06/uk-launch-symposium-patriotic-rocket-scientists-want-to-put-britain-back-into-launch-business-but-know-that-affordability-is-the-key/

Coincidentally, $5-8 million is the range Shotwell mentioned at a satellite industry conference as the long-term price for a Falcon 9 class launch.

Offline fast

  • Member
  • Posts: 98
  • Liked: 23
  • Likes Given: 28
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #155 on: 03/05/2015 09:46 am »
Here is another article on small LVs. They say Firefly Alpha sun synchronous payload is 210kg, if is so then the per kg to orbit is similar to Electron. ie $5m for 110kg compared to $8m for 210kg.

http://seradata.com/SSI/2014/06/uk-launch-symposium-patriotic-rocket-scientists-want-to-put-britain-back-into-launch-business-but-know-that-affordability-is-the-key/

Coincidentally, $5-8 million is the range Shotwell mentioned at a satellite industry conference as the long-term price for a Falcon 9 class launch.


$5-8 million for 13 150 kg to LEO :D

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9238
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4477
  • Likes Given: 1108
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #156 on: 03/05/2015 07:37 pm »
$5-8 million for 13 150 kg to LEO :D

With an aspiration of 12 launches per year.. woooo.. they're totally going to own the entire market for launches with that!
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #157 on: 03/05/2015 08:52 pm »
Good luck booking a F9R launch in need few years for $8m.

Offline RanulfC

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
  • Heus tu Omnis! Vigilate Hoc!
  • Liked: 900
  • Likes Given: 32
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #158 on: 03/05/2015 09:12 pm »
P.S.  I found it really nutting that they claim launching small sats and creating small sat constellations is what will lead to space-colonization.  By definition these small launch vehicles are incapable of being used in manned space flight even to LEO (a human rated capsule for 1 person exceeds their launch capability), their is no way they can colonize anything with this tech even if they had thousands of them and they were fully reusable.

Maybe they meant colonization by ants. :-)

This leads to having to point this out:
"The Program"
(Background)http://www.klydemorris.com/theprogram.cfm
(Strip itself)http://www.klydemorris.com/strips.cfm?Strip_ID=286

Ants in space :)

Randy
From The Amazing Catstronaut on the Black Arrow LV:
British physics, old chap. It's undignified to belch flames and effluvia all over the pad, what. A true gentlemen's orbital conveyance lifts itself into the air unostentatiously, with the minimum of spectacle and a modicum of grace. Not like our American cousins' launch vehicles, eh?

Offline ChrisWilson68

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5266
  • Sunnyvale, CA
  • Liked: 4992
  • Likes Given: 6459
Re: RocketLab Electron Smallsat Launcher
« Reply #159 on: 03/05/2015 10:03 pm »
$5-8 million for 13 150 kg to LEO :D

With an aspiration of 12 launches per year.. woooo.. they're totally going to own the entire market for launches with that!

Yeah, I'm sure you believe 100% that SpaceX's aspirations stop at 12 launches a year. :-)

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0