* SpaceX General* SpaceX Missions* SpaceX Vehicles* SpaceX Facilities* SpaceX Speculation* SpaceX Megathread Archive
If SpaceX Mars becomes BFR, where do old Red Dragon threads get archived? Just a thought.
SpaceX Company (or corporate? Or simply "SpaceX". Specifically/directly about it and its locations and related ventures)SpaceX Missions and Tests (anything in a mission flow start (test?) to finish (recovery/disposal)SpaceX Current Vehicles/Pads (vehicles/facilities in use or under construction? F9/F9US/Dragon/FH/BFS, 39A, 40, 4E, LZ1 ...)SpaceX Current Vehicle Recovery/Reuse (actual practice and economics of the business, effectively how does it yield)SpaceX Future/Other Vehicles (not in use or under construction (like BFR), ITS/F1/F5/BFS tanker?)SpaceX Plans and Options (include Mars, moon base, other)
Similarly, actual BFR/BFS development is fairly low-traffic. There's just not enough information flowing to fill a section. This will ramp up at the same rate that Falcon ramps down.
I think we should keep the number of sections unchanged, it's already tiresome to click through to 4 sections, I think 5+ is overkill. A lot of the proposed sections would have very little traffic, for example Starlink. Also what's wrong with having speculation/future discussion in General section?
Quote from: 2megs on 04/09/2018 11:33 amSimilarly, actual BFR/BFS development is fairly low-traffic. ...This is far from true. If you look at the first page in 'SpaceX general' almost half the threads are BFR threads...Not only that but BFR is the hottest topic in SpaceX Mars and maybe SpaceX Reuse as well...
Similarly, actual BFR/BFS development is fairly low-traffic. ...
Am I the only one wondering if this site is fast-moving enough to demand so many SpaceX subforums? Would one forum for all things SpaceX really be that bad?Maybe one for SpaceX news articles, and one for SpaceX general?The thing about categorization is it's always gonna be ambiguous; one good way to not get lost in the weeds is to create as few categories as is practicable.
Totally disagree!