Just updated a few booster assignments on nextspaceflight, specifically for the FH missions this year. 72 and 75 will not fly as FH side boosters as originally planned and will now remain as F9 boosters for the foreseeable future.
B1084 (FH Core, although listed as F9):- Psyche (NET October 10th)
20 launches done, 70+ for rest of year
Is the Viasat-3 launch delay a problem for the Axiom AX-2 mission schedule?https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=46655.msg2475104#msg2475104
To maintain the ISS Visiting Vehicle schedule, will Axiom-2 maintain its May 8 launch date, and the ViaSat-3 Americas launch be delayed to NET late May?(change-out of TEL Falcon Heavy adapter for Falcon 9 adapter and back to Falcon Heavy adapter)
Scheduled to launch in April:Apr 19 12:28 CCSFS SLC-40 ASOG Starlink 6-2Apr 28 21:12 CCSFS SLC-40 ASDS O3b mPower 3/4NET late Apr CCSFS SLC-40 ASDS Starlink 6-3NET late Apr CCSFS SLC-40 ASDS Starlink 5-9
The Commission reckons only SpaceX's Falcon 9 heavy launcher and United Launch Alliance's Vulcan system are up to the job of sending the EU's new geo-navigation Galileo satellites — which weigh around 700 kilograms each — into orbit.
Made a bunch of updates to the upcoming manifest on Nextspaceflight. 10 launches on the schedule for May 2023 with some record pad turnarounds to be expected. A couple of missions got bumped to June but only cause we don't know when they're exactly are going to occur but we do know they're not going to happen in May so pushing them to the following month for the time being.
Fully expendable Falcon Heavy on Wednesday. May get lost after the Starship test flight. This is going to amazing to watch the burn times on the side boosters.
SPACEX STARLINK 5-6 CCSFS, FLPRIMARY: 05/02/23 0810-1250ZBACKUP(S): 05/03/23 0745-1224Z 05/04/23 0719-1159Z 05/05/23 0654-1134Z 05/06/23 0629-1109Z 05/07/23 0604-1044Z 05/08/23 0538-1018Z
QuoteSPACEX STARLINK 5-6 CCSFS, FLPRIMARY: 05/02/23 0810-1250ZBACKUP(S): 05/03/23 0745-1224Z 05/04/23 0719-1159Z 05/05/23 0654-1134Z 05/06/23 0629-1109Z 05/07/23 0604-1044Z 05/08/23 0538-1018ZIs this a typo, or are they really going to send a batch of starlinks into orbit that were not expected by the community?
2117-EX-ST-2022 Starlink Group 5-?"launch vehicle communications for a spare Starlink Group 5 mission"from Florida NET mid-JanuaryASDS North 25 36 35 West 74 47 47
https://twitter.com/andrewparsonson/status/1651232274011004930QuoteBreaking: I have heard from a source that @esa is looking to qualify Sentinel-1C to fly aboard a @SpaceX Falcon 9. The agency is keen to get the satellite into orbit ASAP with the Sentinel-1 constellation operating at a reduced capacity following the loss of Sentinel-1B.
Breaking: I have heard from a source that @esa is looking to qualify Sentinel-1C to fly aboard a @SpaceX Falcon 9. The agency is keen to get the satellite into orbit ASAP with the Sentinel-1 constellation operating at a reduced capacity following the loss of Sentinel-1B.
"The Ariane, unfortunately, we had to change because they were having difficulties getting the Ariane 6 ready to go."This probably will result in another Falcon Heavy being added to the manifest in 2024 since ULA has no spare capacity on Vulcan for awhile.
On the eve of launching its first ViaSat 3 internet satellite on a SpaceX rocket, Viasat says it has moved the launch of an identical spacecraft off of Europe's long-delayed Ariane 6 rocket, and is considering bids from other rocket companies. spaceflightnow.com/2023/04/30/via…
Thanks to tonight’s launch, we have now seen all three of #SpaceX’s active orbital-class rockets - #Falcon9, #FalconHeavy, & #Starship - all take flight within a 10-day time span.I don’t think we’ll see something like this again for a long while, if ever again. 😮📸: SpaceX