Chris Bergin 10/1/2008 11:44 AM (#230325 - in reply to #222617)Feb 2 looking solid as per PRCB.
ssb - 10/1/2008 7:01 PMQuoteChris Bergin 10/1/2008 11:44 AM (#230325 - in reply to #222617)Feb 2 looking solid as per PRCB.Something is inconsistent here =)
Lawntonlookirs - 2/2/2008 4:17 PM It seems that the Russian Soyuz is very quickly assembled and reliable. Interesting pictures, and I am sure we will see some of the launch.
While I agree with you in the "quickly-assembled and reliable" part, this vehicule is a Progress, as you certainly will have read in the thread's title. Of course, it's based in Soyuz design and shares a big commonality, but it's nevertheless a simpler version. Undoubtedly, the Soyuz capsule must be far more difficult to build and assemble, given its human-rated nature.
ksc_houston - 5/2/2008 9:45 AMWill be any launch coverage ?
Satori - 6/2/2008 12:13 AMAnyone has the exact launch time in the format 1302:54.XXXUTC and the launcher serial number? Thanks!
jancarlobascu - 5/2/2008 2:43 PM 1730th launch of Soyuz rocket and 714th for Soyuz-U variant
Actually I meant the rocket's serial number (No. 10-?)
Also what were the correct serial numbers for these previous Progress launches (there are 2 numbers the same):
Suzy - 7/2/2008 9:48 AMwhat were the correct serial numbers for these previous Progress launches
anik - 7/2/2008 1:17 PMQuoteSuzy - 7/2/2008 9:48 AMwhat were the correct serial numbers for these previous Progress launchesTs15000-104 for M-60, Sh15000-108 for M-61, according to Novosti kosmonavtiki magazine...
anik - 9/2/2008 6:16 AM Quoteanik - 7/2/2008 1:17 PM Ts15000-104 for M-60, Sh15000-108 for M-61, according to Novosti kosmonavtiki magazine... Sh15000-109 for M-62, according to that magazine as well...
anik - 7/2/2008 1:17 PM Ts15000-104 for M-60, Sh15000-108 for M-61, according to Novosti kosmonavtiki magazine...
Thanks! So M-63 was No. ...110?
Suzy - 9/2/2008 9:01 AMSo M-63 was No. ...110?