Author Topic: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread  (Read 1026532 times)

Offline mlindner

  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2908
  • Space Capitalist
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Liked: 2204
  • Likes Given: 818
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1000 on: 07/03/2013 06:02 am »
Trying to figure out where the updates are it seems like Facebook and Twitter are getting the info while the main jpl page and youtube are dormant.

https://twitter.com/marscuriosity

https://www.facebook.com/MarsCuriosity

Curiosity has been visiting Point Lake and is now at Shaler.

The raw images site is going so slow it might be quicker to direct download from Mars  :D

Here's a few shots from Shaler I've picked out. Enjoy  8)

Cross bedded sandstone....

For us non-geologists, whats the significance of "cross bedded sandstone?"
LEO is the ocean, not an island (let alone a continent). We create cruise liners to ride the oceans, not artificial islands in the middle of them. We need a physical place, which has physical resources, to make our future out there.

Offline jebbo

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 940
  • Cambridge, UK
  • Liked: 608
  • Likes Given: 309
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1001 on: 07/03/2013 11:35 am »
For us non-geologists, whats the significance of "cross bedded sandstone?"

The deposition mechanism: was it aeolian (wind) or fluvial (water)?

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2766
  • Liked: 780
  • Likes Given: 1132
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1002 on: 07/04/2013 11:31 pm »

Cross bedded sandstone....

For us non-geologists, whats the significance of "cross bedded sandstone?"

Jebbo is right, cross-bedding forms when sand is deposited in a specific velocity regime.  From it we can infer things like flow velocity, grainsize, depositional environment, and transport direction.  They are very important palaeoenvironmental indicators.  With a bit more work we can determine whether they were deposited by wind or water, and by what sort of bedform (which type of bar or dune).
« Last Edit: 07/04/2013 11:33 pm by Dalhousie »
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline Bubbinski

"ROAD TRIP!"

Curiosity's started her drive to Mt. Sharp.  This could take 6 mos. to a year to do.  If it takes an earth year to get there from this day, then she'd get there about 90 days before a big comet approaches Mars.  Lots of spectacular views possible.  Looking forward to her arrival, and seeing those daily raw images showing the drive will be very interesting, at least to me.

A link to an announcement from the USGS Astrogeology page:

http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/news?id=news/sol-326-update-on-curiosity-from-usgs-scientist-ken-herkenhoff-road-trip
I'll even excitedly look forward to "flags and footprints" and suborbital missions. Just fly...somewhere.

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2766
  • Liked: 780
  • Likes Given: 1132
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1004 on: 07/07/2013 10:06 pm »
At the rate taken since landing Curiosity will be at the foothills of Mt Sharp in about a decade...
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline spectre9

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2403
  • Australia
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 68
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1005 on: 07/07/2013 10:48 pm »
At the rate taken since landing Curiosity will be at the foothills of Mt Sharp in about a decade...

Not quite. Looking at the pics it does seem like they have a bit of a boring drive through a flat rocky area.

Perhaps it was worth investigating the interesting features near the landing site.

This drive seems to be progressing well. No thick sand. I suspect JPL don't want to release an official update until they've clocked some miles so they can't be accused of having gone nowhere in a whole year.

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2766
  • Liked: 780
  • Likes Given: 1132
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1006 on: 07/08/2013 04:31 am »
At the rate taken since landing Curiosity will be at the foothills of Mt Sharp in about a decade...

Not quite. Looking at the pics it does seem like they have a bit of a boring drive through a flat rocky area.

Not much was expected on the road to Gelnelg (although anyone from Adelaide could have told them differently ;) ).  I am sure they will see lots of potentially interesting things cand have to cose between driving on, brief stop to do contact science and ChemCam work, or a more detailed site investigation.

Quote
Perhaps it was worth investigating the interesting features near the landing site.

I think so, although to date we only have had one paper (although lots of abstracts)

Quote
This drive seems to be progressing well. No thick sand. I suspect JPL don't want to release an official update until they've clocked some miles so they can't be accused of having gone nowhere in a whole year.

I don't think they have got very far as yet.  One drive of just under 18 m on Sol 324. http://curiosityrover.com/tracking/drivelog.html

I don't think sand will be an issue until they get close to the foothills of Mt Sharp, then there is the barchan belt to negotiate.  This will be quite interesting as satellite imagery indicates that these are near 10 m high and that their surfaces are actiively moving.
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline notsorandom

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1740
  • Ohio
  • Liked: 438
  • Likes Given: 91
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1007 on: 07/08/2013 01:02 pm »
Getting to Mt. Sharp or not lets remember that MSL has already accomplished all of its mission goals. Everything else at this point is a bonus, and I am sure that there are many more interesting things that will be discovered before it reaches the mountain.

Offline JohnFornaro

  • Not an expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10974
  • Delta-t is an important metric.
  • Planet Eaarth
    • Design / Program Associates
  • Liked: 1257
  • Likes Given: 724
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1008 on: 07/08/2013 01:25 pm »
Getting to Mt. Sharp or not lets remember that MSL has already accomplished all of its mission goals. Everything else at this point is a bonus, and I am sure that there are many more interesting things that will be discovered before it reaches the mountain.

One of those goals was to search for "signs of possible life".  I haven't heard an official announcement that this goal had been met.
Sometimes I just flat out don't get it.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37442
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 21452
  • Likes Given: 428
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1009 on: 07/08/2013 01:41 pm »
Yes,  the process of searching has been successful.  That was the goal.  The results of the search is a different matter

Offline pippin

  • Regular
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2575
  • Liked: 312
  • Likes Given: 45
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1010 on: 07/08/2013 02:09 pm »
You can't credibly set a goal of actually finding something of which you don't know whether it's there.
The whole "signs of life on Mars" story (at least in general publications) is already on the brink of fudging up stories just because people WANT to hear that signs of life have been found (although all the evidence found so far strongly suggest there has been none because on earth it's so ubiquitous that you will immediately find it's signs wherever you look and that probably wouldn't change for hundreds of millions of years even if it completely died now).

Your goal can be whether life is or has been possible and to search whether or not there are signs for it and whatever you find is the result and if the result is conclusive (in whatever direction) and procedurally OK, then that's a success.
« Last Edit: 07/08/2013 02:10 pm by pippin »

Offline JohnFornaro

  • Not an expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10974
  • Delta-t is an important metric.
  • Planet Eaarth
    • Design / Program Associates
  • Liked: 1257
  • Likes Given: 724
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1011 on: 07/08/2013 02:57 pm »
Yes,  the process of searching has been successful.  That was the goal.  The results of the search is a different matter

Mission accomplished?
Sometimes I just flat out don't get it.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8520
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3543
  • Likes Given: 759
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1012 on: 07/08/2013 03:00 pm »
One of those goals was to search for "signs of possible life".

I thought it was to search for signs of past habitability?

Offline hop

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
  • Liked: 553
  • Likes Given: 891
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1013 on: 07/08/2013 08:00 pm »
I thought it was to search for signs of past habitability?
Indeed it is. From the mission fact sheet: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/fact_sheets/mars-science-laboratory.pdf
Quote
The overarching science goal of the mission is to assess whether the landing area has ever had or still has environmental conditions favorable to microbial life, both its habitability and its preservation.
(my bold)
Every time questions about life come up in the press conferences, the team go out of their way to emphasize that that the mission is about habitability not past or present life detection.

They did announce that preliminary results from the John Klein mudstone showed it was a relatively habitable environment at some point in the past. Considering that they expected to have to drive many km to even get to that kind of environment, it's seems difficult to argue that they are behind on their goals.

Based on MER experience, we should expect the pace of drives to pick up significantly once they get into the swing of things.

Of course, it's a science driven mission, so there will undoubtedly be stops and detours along the way.

Offline spectre9

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2403
  • Australia
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 68

Offline JohnFornaro

  • Not an expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10974
  • Delta-t is an important metric.
  • Planet Eaarth
    • Design / Program Associates
  • Liked: 1257
  • Likes Given: 724
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1015 on: 07/09/2013 01:40 am »
Yes,  the process of searching has been successful.  That was the goal.  The results of the search is a different matter

Mission accomplished?

... the rover found evidence for an ancient wet environment that had conditions favorable for microbial life. This means the mission already accomplished its main science objective.

Looks like me and Jim are both right!

YPMV  (Your Parsing Might Vary)
Sometimes I just flat out don't get it.

Offline RigelFive

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 215
  • I hope that you relish Tranya as much I
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1016 on: 07/09/2013 06:17 am »
An update!!!  :o

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-215
Hmmmmph!

If it takes a nuclear powered rover ONE EARTH YEAR to reach its target by creeping along the surface of Mars... wouldst reason not provide for another rover sent from Earth to just intrinsically arrive at said target in less time?   Perhaps next time, a multi rover mission would be a smidge cheaper, faster, harder, stronger, et cetera, et cetera, in order to reach said target?

Also, when the MSL rover actually arrives at Mount Sharp, will the habitability of Mars suddenly become apparent?  So then like, all of the manned Mars missions will then land at Mount Sharp?

Offline spectre9

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2403
  • Australia
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 68
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1017 on: 07/09/2013 07:04 am »
It's all about the landing zone.

They didn't want to be flying the skycrane near the mountain.

This photo was uploaded a while back showing how far Curiosity has to travel.

I thought they were going through the black sand but it looks like they are charting their way around it.

The main science objective for this mission has already been met. They didn't have to sift through all the layers of Mt Sharp to find what they were looking for.

Now everything is a bonus. Perhaps they will now be able to ascertain at what times and for how long Mars was habitable.

The next Mars lander (Insight) will have a whole new set of science objectives. It's not a rover and it's designed to look farther underneath the surface than Curiosity can with it's short drill and laser.


Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2766
  • Liked: 780
  • Likes Given: 1132
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1018 on: 07/09/2013 11:25 am »
Yesterday the rover drove almost 40 m http://curiosityrover.com/tracking/drivelog.html
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline JohnFornaro

  • Not an expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10974
  • Delta-t is an important metric.
  • Planet Eaarth
    • Design / Program Associates
  • Liked: 1257
  • Likes Given: 724
Re: LIVE: MSL Curiosity Post Landing SOL 1 onwards Update Thread
« Reply #1019 on: 07/09/2013 01:07 pm »
Also, when the MSL rover actually arrives at Mount Sharp, will the habitability of Mars suddenly become apparent?

We now know that "the rover found evidence for an ancient wet environment that had conditions favorable for microbial life".

The mission has "already accomplished its main science objective".  By this metric, the mission is already a complete success.  This is the only metric that matters.  You know that.

What we have now are the bonus science objectives, literally at no extra cost.

You should also know that general questions about the "why" of this mission, beyond the demonstrated current success, are not appreciated.  Once the experts decide what they want to do next, you will be informed.
Sometimes I just flat out don't get it.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0