The U.S. Navy has released 35 brief reports regarding various incidents involving its ships and facilities and unidentified small uncrewed aircraft systems, or sUASs, across the entire span of the Pacific between 2016 and 2021. Not all of the reports appear to be notable, and some are clearly innocuous, but others absolutely provide additional evidence of concerning trends that The War Zone has been actively reporting on in recent years. Among the newly released reports, for instance, is one that covers a worrying encounter that the Arleigh Burke class destroyer USS Paul Hamilton had with four drones in the Pacific off the coast of southern California in 2019, which you can read more about in our past reporting here.
"unidentified small uncrewed aircraft systems, or sUASs"
We’ve selected 16 individuals to participate in an independent study team on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), or observations in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena. The nine-month study will begin on Oct. 24: https://go.nasa.gov/3Dd1jo7
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/mystery-drones-swarming-navy-destroyer-shined-lights-on-its-bridges
Quote from: Star One on 10/14/2022 06:13 pmhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/mystery-drones-swarming-navy-destroyer-shined-lights-on-its-bridgesDead link
Quote from: laszlo on 10/21/2022 05:11 pmQuote from: Star One on 10/14/2022 06:13 pmhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/mystery-drones-swarming-navy-destroyer-shined-lights-on-its-bridgesDead linkTry https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/mystery-drones-swarming-navy-destroyer-shined-lights-on-its-bridge
Quote from: NASAWe’ve selected 16 individuals to participate in an independent study team on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), or observations in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena. The nine-month study will begin on Oct. 24: https://go.nasa.gov/3Dd1jo7Among the 16 persons are Mike Gold and Scott Kelly.
Quote"unidentified small uncrewed aircraft systems, or sUASs"We're going to regret letting the DoD change the default acronym from UFO.
The unfortunate part of all this is that since UAS and UAP differ by only one letter, we're going to start seeing a lot more conflation of the 2 wildly different phenomena, as happened in this thread.
Quote from: yg1968 on 10/21/2022 03:38 pmQuote from: NASAWe’ve selected 16 individuals to participate in an independent study team on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), or observations in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena. The nine-month study will begin on Oct. 24: https://go.nasa.gov/3Dd1jo7Among the 16 persons are Mike Gold and Scott Kelly. Yawn. As I'm fond of saying, wake me up when the aliens have an embassy in DC.
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena: New U.S. Intelligence Report Releasedhttps://leonarddavid.com/unidentified-aerial-phenomena-new-u-s-intelligence-report-released/
Please help me understand. The last two objects over Alaska and Canada are cylindrical in shape. Not an idea shape for a lighter than air object. With no obvious means of propulsion how does it remain at altitude for prolonged periods if it is not lighter than air. Why do they not fall out of the sky? I am trying to understand. The only ridiculous answer that comes to mind is anti gravity. The Air Force must have a good idea what it looks like and what it’s density is. Strange!
Please help me understand. The last two objects over Alaska and Canada are cylindrical in shape. Not an idea shape for a lighter than air object. With no obvious means of propulsion how does it remain at altitude for prolonged periods if it is not lighter than air. Why do they not fall out of the sky? I am trying to understand. The only ridiculous answer that comes to mind is anti gravity. The Air Force must have a good idea what it looks like and what it’s density is. StrangeThe Senate now reports it is a balloon.