Author Topic: Firefly Aerospace  (Read 348937 times)

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33296
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 58607
  • Likes Given: 26233
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #900 on: 08/08/2022 05:28 pm »
New agreement with Northrop (to develop new Antares first stage) is a big win for Firefly.

New thread: Northrop teams with Firefly
« Last Edit: 08/08/2022 05:28 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline Daniels30

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 128
  • Liked: 263
  • Likes Given: 176
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #901 on: 08/08/2022 05:41 pm »
The Antares 330 uses the new updated Beta booster.

https://firefly.com/beta/
“There are a thousand things that can happen when you go to light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good.” -
Tom Mueller, SpaceX Co founder and Propulsion CTO.

Offline Mackilroy

  • Member
  • Posts: 74
  • Liked: 104
  • Likes Given: 320
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #902 on: 08/08/2022 05:46 pm »
Interesting. Seems like a lifeline for Firefly.

Offline russianhalo117

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8231
  • Liked: 4070
  • Likes Given: 756
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #903 on: 08/08/2022 07:21 pm »
The Antares 330 uses the new updated Beta booster.

https://firefly.com/beta/
AFAIU a derivative of the Beta booster to sort NG's needs.

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1191
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 1628
  • Likes Given: 49
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #904 on: 08/08/2022 07:24 pm »
The Antares 330 uses the new updated Beta booster.

https://firefly.com/beta/
AFAIU a derivative of the Beta booster to sort NG's needs.

One would imagine that Firefly would like to have as much commonality between the Antares 330 and Firefly Beta first stages as possible, and Firefly Beta is at an early enough stage of development that they could basically just design the first stage to fit Antares, then design their own in-house second stage to fit that first stage.

Offline russianhalo117

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8231
  • Liked: 4070
  • Likes Given: 756
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #905 on: 08/08/2022 07:37 pm »
The Antares 330 uses the new updated Beta booster.

https://firefly.com/beta/
AFAIU a derivative of the Beta booster to sort NG's needs.

One would imagine that Firefly would like to have as much commonality between the Antares 330 and Firefly Beta first stages as possible, and Firefly Beta is at an early enough stage of development that they could basically just design the first stage to fit Antares, then design their own in-house second stage to fit that first stage.
Beta has 7 Miranda and Antares 3xx series graphic is different on the aft end in that has 3 inline engines, a different thrust structure, boattail and the new stage is slightly stretched to ~4.1m to add propellant capacity whilst maintaining the predecessor stages original height. The Beta is 55.66m overall with its first stage greater in length than Antares and 4.3m in diameter. Keep in mind that the pathfinder Beta firsts stage was subscale.
« Last Edit: 08/08/2022 07:40 pm by russianhalo117 »

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1191
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 1628
  • Likes Given: 49
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #906 on: 08/08/2022 07:51 pm »
The Antares 330 uses the new updated Beta booster.

https://firefly.com/beta/
AFAIU a derivative of the Beta booster to sort NG's needs.

One would imagine that Firefly would like to have as much commonality between the Antares 330 and Firefly Beta first stages as possible, and Firefly Beta is at an early enough stage of development that they could basically just design the first stage to fit Antares, then design their own in-house second stage to fit that first stage.
Beta has 7 Miranda and Antares 3xx series graphic is different on the aft end in that has 3 inline engines, a different thrust structure, boattail and the new stage is slightly stretched to ~4.1m to add propellant capacity whilst maintaining the predecessor stages original height. The Beta is 55.66m overall with its first stage greater in length than Antares and 4.3m in diameter. Keep in mind that the pathfinder Beta firsts stage was subscale.

The Antares 330  render does show three in-line engines, but the press release says "The Antares 330 will utilize seven of Firefly’s Miranda engines." So I think they're both using seven engines. This also calls into question the accuracy of other parts of the renders, so we can't rely on those to spot differences.

You're right that the Antares 330 first stage will be sized to have the same height as the 230's first stage, so that the GSE for the second stage and payload can stay the same, but I think they'd sooner redesign the Firefly Beta around those parameters than build a stage with different dimensions.

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #907 on: 08/08/2022 09:58 pm »
The Antares 330 uses the new updated Beta booster.

https://firefly.com/beta/
AFAIU a derivative of the Beta booster to sort NG's needs.

One would imagine that Firefly would like to have as much commonality between the Antares 330 and Firefly Beta first stages as possible, and Firefly Beta is at an early enough stage of development that they could basically just design the first stage to fit Antares, then design their own in-house second stage to fit that first stage.
Beta has 7 Miranda and Antares 3xx series graphic is different on the aft end in that has 3 inline engines, a different thrust structure, boattail and the new stage is slightly stretched to ~4.1m to add propellant capacity whilst maintaining the predecessor stages original height. The Beta is 55.66m overall with its first stage greater in length than Antares and 4.3m in diameter. Keep in mind that the pathfinder Beta firsts stage was subscale.

The Antares 330  render does show three in-line engines, but the press release says "The Antares 330 will utilize seven of Firefly’s Miranda engines." So I think they're both using seven engines. This also calls into question the accuracy of other parts of the renders, so we can't rely on those to spot differences.

You're right that the Antares 330 first stage will be sized to have the same height as the 230's first stage, so that the GSE for the second stage and payload can stay the same, but I think they'd sooner redesign the Firefly Beta around those parameters than build a stage with different dimensions.
Beta will hopefully fly lot more than Antares so best not compromise its design to save on booster tooling costs.

Beta will fly from new pad so doesn't need to be limited by Antares infrastructure. While two boosters may have different dimensions, all internal equipment will be same and that is expensive stuff to design and build.
« Last Edit: 08/08/2022 10:01 pm by zubenelgenubi »

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6280
  • Liked: 8870
  • Likes Given: 870
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #908 on: 08/09/2022 02:53 am »
Everybody is upsizing their LVs:

https://twitter.com/Alexphysics13/status/1556691605154824192

Quote
Along with this, it seems like Firefly has changed the design of their Beta rocket. Its engines aren't Reaver 2 and Lightning 2, now they're Miranda and Viranda. The rocket went from 3.6m diameter to 4.3m diameter and payload to LEO from 8t to 13t.

Online ethan829

Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #909 on: 08/09/2022 02:36 pm »
An update on Alpha flight 2 from CNBC:
Quote
Schumacher said Firefly completed a fueling milestone for the second Alpha launch on Monday, known as a wet dress rehearsal – with a hot fire engine test scheduled for later this week.


“We are planning on our first launch window for that second flight, [which opens] on September 11,” Schumacher said.

Offline Rondaz

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27060
  • Liked: 5287
  • Likes Given: 166
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #910 on: 08/09/2022 03:17 pm »
But the plan faced a gap in Cygnus cargo spacecraft launches to the ISS, so Northrop Grumman bought three Falcon 9 launches from SpaceX to keep flying every six months.

2x Antares 230+➡️3x Falcon 9➡️Antares 330 debut..

https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1557015062950322176

Offline rocketfan86

  • Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #911 on: 08/12/2022 05:56 pm »
Looks like they pushed out some new renders that line up with what NG had (but flipped raceways? opposite view I guess), and Beta is now officially seemingly being dubbed MLV.

https://firefly.com/beta/

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #912 on: 08/13/2022 10:23 am »
Just read their lander user guide. They are also developing a space tug that can be used to deliver theirs and others landers to LLO then stay in orbit as comms relay. Firefly answer to RL Photon.

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1191
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 1628
  • Likes Given: 49
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #913 on: 08/14/2022 12:20 am »
Just read their lander user guide. They are also developing a space tug that can be used to deliver theirs and others landers to LLO then stay in orbit as comms relay. Firefly answer to RL Photon.

Yeah, their so-called "Space Utility Vehicle" has its own page and user's guide: https://firefly.com/suv/

Online edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4903
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 7128
  • Likes Given: 36
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #914 on: 08/15/2022 09:07 am »
SUV user's guide attached.

Offline ParabolicSnark

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 127
  • CA
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 107
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #915 on: 09/01/2022 03:19 pm »
Firefly has completed its search for its new CEO.

https://spacenews.com/firefly-hires-new-ceo-ahead-of-second-launch/
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/firefly-aerospace-names-bill-weber-as-ceo-301616142.html

Quote
[Bill] Weber was previously president and chief executive of KeyW Corporation, a cyberspace operations and geospatial intelligence company serving the national security community. [...] he was an executive at several other companies supporting the federal government in national security and diplomacy, including XLA, Kaseman and GTSI Corporation. He also was a founding partner of First Light Acquisition Corporation, a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) seeking to merge with a company in the aerospace and defense markets.

XLA: another cybersecurity firm
Kaseman: counter-terroris(m training and security services (and whos website domain is available for purchase))
GTSI: Government IT firm since sold to UNICOM Government

That doesn't exactly give me a lot of warm fuzzies for any continued innovation. Seems like a hire to keep the ship afloat for a future acquisition

Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #916 on: 09/01/2022 05:26 pm »
Yeah look like Firefly, will be the next Orbital Sciencs-ATK... acquired by Northrop...
The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Offline Asteroza

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
  • Liked: 817
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #917 on: 09/01/2022 10:35 pm »
Yeah look like Firefly, will be the next Orbital Sciencs-ATK... acquired by Northrop...

Eh, it could be worse, they could be acquired by Boeing...

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #918 on: 09/02/2022 12:54 am »
Yeah look like Firefly, will be the next Orbital Sciencs-ATK... acquired by Northrop...
Likely outcome as AE Industrial Partners (AEI) will be looking for exit strategy. NG are serious about staying in launch industry given effort they put into Omega and replacing Antares twice now.


Re: Firefly Aerospace
« Reply #919 on: 09/03/2022 12:17 am »
Yeah look like Firefly, will be the next Orbital Sciencs-ATK... acquired by Northrop...

Perhaps we should be surprised that in the last 6 months or so of this "1-ton launcher race", the big boys have stepped in. I mean, when the Firefly-NG deal is taken together with how heavily Lockheed Martin is invested in ABL, and the ridiculous amounts of investment money Relativity keeps raking in from somewhere, it suddenly all looks like a bit of a proxy war. And it definitely seem that way last year.


Eh, it could be worse, they could be acquired by Boeing...

You joke, but between LM and NG's interest in this part of the market, and Boeing being so abysmal lately, I think we should actually count our blessings.
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement SkyTale Software GmbH
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0