Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink Group 4-7 : KSC LC-39A : 3 February 2022 (18:13 UTC)  (Read 75964 times)

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2287
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 4087
  • Likes Given: 4276
L-1 weather forecast.  90% 'Go' for January 31.  80% 'Go' for February 1.  All Additional Risk Criteria are Low for both days.

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2016
  • Liked: 2987
  • Likes Given: 2203
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.twitter.com/conexionspacial | https://conexionespacial.com

Offline ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8282
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2246
  • Likes Given: 1986
I think I have proof that B1061 will be used for this mission. How exactly? By examining the soot markings from the previous mission.

Here are some past pictures of B1061 before IXPE and the recent dual Falcon 9 photo SpaceX posted on Twitter.
« Last Edit: 01/30/2022 09:19 pm by ZachS09 »
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2016
  • Liked: 2987
  • Likes Given: 2203
Waiting for a new launch time for this mission due to the cancellation of the CSG-2 launch.

Hold was at T-33 seconds due to ship in the range. Will be trying again tomorrow.
« Last Edit: 01/30/2022 10:24 pm by zubenelgenubi »
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.twitter.com/conexionspacial | https://conexionespacial.com

Offline scr00chy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1164
  • Czechia
    • ElonX.net
  • Liked: 1645
  • Likes Given: 1437
I see the thread title was updated to a new launch date and time.

Is that in any way confirmed, or is it just someone's assumption based on the CSG-2 scrub?

Offline SpaceFinnOriginal

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Liked: 37
  • Likes Given: 132
A Shortfall of Gravitas droneship is outbound for the Starlink mission NET Jan 29 at 3pm ET.

Very busy month for ASOG whilst JRTI is out of service for work after B1069 shenanigans.

What tug will be used?

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9803
  • US
  • Liked: 12985
  • Likes Given: 5625
I see the thread title was updated to a new launch date and time.

Is that in any way confirmed, or is it just someone's assumption based on the CSG-2 scrub?

It's my assumption based on CSG-2 being tomorrow.

Online Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36315
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 27435
  • Likes Given: 5878
At the end of the CSG-2 SpaceX Mission Control Audio YouTube stream, they said  "This will be our final attempt ahead of NROL 87 launch." That sounds like the Starlink launch will be after NROL 87, currently scheduled for Wednesday 2 February. Go to 59:20 in the video below.

« Last Edit: 01/30/2022 11:33 pm by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline lenny97

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 122
  • Pescara, Abruzzo - Italy
  • Liked: 241
  • Likes Given: 234
At the end of the CSG-2 Space Mission Control Audio YouTube stream, they said  "This will be our final attempt ahead of NROL 87 launch." That sounds like the Starlink launch will be after NROL 87, currently scheduled for Tuesday 2 February. Go to 59:20 in the video below.



It could also be "our final attemp (of this launch) ahead of NROL-87".

Also, for what is worth, Jami Higginbotham replied to someone saying that the three launches are back-to-back. So 31, 1 and 2.
Founder of www.spacevoyaging.com — Independent Space News Blog
I'm based in Pescara, Italy. Music addicted.

Offline vaporcobra

A Shortfall of Gravitas droneship is outbound for the Starlink mission NET Jan 29 at 3pm ET.

Very busy month for ASOG whilst JRTI is out of service for work after B1069 shenanigans.

What tug will be used?

Zion Falgout left with ASOG.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9803
  • US
  • Liked: 12985
  • Likes Given: 5625
Quote
310200Z JAN 22
NAVAREA IV 107/22(11,26).
WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC.
FLORIDA.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, ROCKET LAUNCHING
   011846Z TO 012313Z, ALTERNATE
   021824Z TO 022251Z FEB
   IN AREAS BOUND BY:
   A. 28-38-17N 080-37-11W, 28-39-00N 080-37-00W,
      28-38-00N 080-24-00W, 28-22-00N 079-55-00W,
      28-18-00N 079-56-00W, 28-33-24N 080-33-59W.
   B. 25-59-00N 076-00-00W, 26-40-00N 075-09-00W,
      25-37-00N 073-53-00W, 24-53-00N 074-44-00W.
2. CANCEL NAVAREA IV 98/22.
3. CANCEL THIS MSG 022351Z FEB 22.
« Last Edit: 01/31/2022 02:23 pm by gongora »

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2287
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 4087
  • Likes Given: 4276
L-1 weather forecast (additional evidence that SpaceX is actually planning a launch attempt for tomorrow).  90% 'Go' for February 1.  80% 'Go' for February 2.  All Additional Risk Criteria are Low for both days.

Offline Galactic Penguin SST

SFN now confirms Feb. 1, 18:56 UTC (1:56 pm EST) for this with 2nd window at 22:13 UTC/5:13 pm EST.
Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery. Current Priority: Chasing the Chinese Spaceflight Wonder Egg & A Certain Chinese Mars Rover

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9803
  • US
  • Liked: 12985
  • Likes Given: 5625
@Ken the Bin, sorry I accidentally messed up one of your posts this morning, hit the wrong button.  Having mod controls on the screen can be dangerous when you're tired.

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2287
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 4087
  • Likes Given: 4276
@Ken the Bin, sorry I accidentally messed up one of your posts this morning, hit the wrong button.  Having mod controls on the screen can be dangerous when you're tired.

I wondered why you removed my calculated times (the first pair of which matched what Galactic Penguin SST posted from SFN).  So I just went ahead and deleted the comment entirely (which then broke vaporcobra's link in his article, sorry Eric).

My calculated times:
February 1 at 18:56 and 22:13 UTC.
February 2 at 18:34 and 21:51 UTC.

The other part of the message was the two Space Debris notices, because you accidentally posted the Rocket Launching notice three times in your comment (you must have been tired then also), which you later removed the two extra.

Quote from: NGA
310216Z JAN 22
HYDROPAC 255/22(GEN).
SOUTHWESTERN INDIAN OCEAN.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
   012031Z TO 020037Z, ALTERNATE
   022009Z TO 030015Z FEB IN AREA BOUND BY
   35-59S 050-22W, 35-28S 049-58W,
   37-16S 045-27W, 45-17S 028-19W,
   47-50S 020-18W, 49-51S 011-01W,
   51-05S 000-43E, 50-46S 014-54E,
   50-33S 021-34E, 46-52S 039-17E,
   43-19S 050-25E, 44-37S 051-06E,
   54-16S 018-06E, 54-22S 004-06E,
   54-22S 000-43E, 54-28S 004-31W,
   53-15S 013-27W, 51-14S 023-03W,
   47-53S 033-10W, 42-56S 042-53W,
   39-07S 048-08W.
2. CANCEL HYDROPAC 249/22.
3. CANCEL THIS MSG 030115Z FEB 22.
Quote from: NGA
310210Z JAN 22
HYDROLANT 305/22(GEN).
SOUTHWESTERN INDIAN OCEAN.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
   012031Z TO 020037Z, ALTERNATE
   022009Z TO 030015Z FEB IN AREA BOUND BY
   35-59S 050-22W, 35-28S 049-58W,
   37-16S 045-27W, 45-17S 028-19W,
   47-50S 020-18W, 49-51S 011-01W,
   51-05S 000-43E, 50-46S 014-54E,
   50-33S 021-34E, 46-52S 039-17E,
   43-19S 050-25E, 44-37S 051-06E,
   54-16S 018-06E, 54-22S 004-06E,
   54-22S 000-43E, 54-28S 004-31W,
   53-15S 013-27W, 51-14S 023-03W,
   47-53S 033-10W, 42-56S 042-53W,
   39-07S 048-08W.
2. CANCEL HYDROLANT 291/22.
3. CANCEL THIS MSG 030115Z FEB 22.

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10214
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 6585
  • Likes Given: 61473
The CSG-2 launch was successful.  Let's see 👀 if there's mention of this launch in the SpaceX webcast.

No, no mention at the webcast close of either upcoming launch.

 🤔
Edit to make my thought clear: Makes one think this launch is delayed until after NROL-87.
« Last Edit: 02/01/2022 01:08 am by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline emmettiscool

  • Member
  • Posts: 9
  • Orlando
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 4
According to TFRs the Starlink launch is Wednesday but that kind of doesn’t seem right

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8624
  • Liked: 4495
  • Likes Given: 768
According to TFRs the Starlink launch is Wednesday but that kind of doesn’t seem right
NROL-87 likely has taken priority across all ranges for SpaceX.

Offline emmettiscool

  • Member
  • Posts: 9
  • Orlando
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 4
According to TFRs the Starlink launch is Wednesday but that kind of doesn’t seem right
NROL-87 likely has taken priority across all ranges for SpaceX.
I guess that but it’s on the same day around 2 hours before NROL 87 unless it takes the backup window

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10214
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 6585
  • Likes Given: 61473
According to TFRs the Starlink launch is Wednesday but that kind of doesn’t seem right
NROL-87 likely has taken priority across all ranges for SpaceX.
If there is an explanation of a (unconfirmed) delay of Starlink 4-7 until NET February 3, I'll be interested to hear it.

SpaceX launches within less than 24 hours of one another is now supposed to be within standard operating procedures?

I wonder if there are additional person-hours (man-hours) required for the actual launch day of a national security launch?  (Or HSF and/or crewed launch?)

And, it's just easier to slightly delay the Starlink launch because it's for the internal customer?

Or, did the five attempts to launch CSG-2 eat into labor costs?  Ending in the same result?

(Direct labor costs for wage employees, especially in terms of overtime.  For salaried employees, indirect costs.)
« Last Edit: 02/01/2022 01:05 am by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1