Quote from: Monomorphic on 08/23/2016 07:01 pmQuote from: SeeShells on 08/23/2016 05:51 pmQuoteBut in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version. http://etheric.com/nassikas-thruster-II/---------------------------------------------A million times thrust with no energy spent? All I'll say is extraordinary claims require extraordinary data.Sorry guys and gals I've been very busy as of late but I haven't forgot anyone here and try to catch up when I can. Testing goes on and the anomaly still remains anonymous. A forced pulsed jerked dual mode of operation is providing some interesting clues. Much more later. My Very Best,ShellDoes anyone know where to get the superconducting nozzle Dr. Nassikas uses? I purchased a high flux magnet with the idea of eventually testing this thruster.Typically, you buy disks, crush them and then make whatever shape you want from that. You just need to re-bake the YCBO into a nozzle shape.IMO, this is a very strong magnet in the Earth's magnetic field. It looks like a compass to me. I wouldn't bother. The claim that it provides thrust with no power input makes everything about it suspect.Todd
Quote from: SeeShells on 08/23/2016 05:51 pmQuoteBut in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version. http://etheric.com/nassikas-thruster-II/---------------------------------------------A million times thrust with no energy spent? All I'll say is extraordinary claims require extraordinary data.Sorry guys and gals I've been very busy as of late but I haven't forgot anyone here and try to catch up when I can. Testing goes on and the anomaly still remains anonymous. A forced pulsed jerked dual mode of operation is providing some interesting clues. Much more later. My Very Best,ShellDoes anyone know where to get the superconducting nozzle Dr. Nassikas uses? I purchased a high flux magnet with the idea of eventually testing this thruster.
QuoteBut in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version. http://etheric.com/nassikas-thruster-II/---------------------------------------------A million times thrust with no energy spent? All I'll say is extraordinary claims require extraordinary data.Sorry guys and gals I've been very busy as of late but I haven't forgot anyone here and try to catch up when I can. Testing goes on and the anomaly still remains anonymous. A forced pulsed jerked dual mode of operation is providing some interesting clues. Much more later. My Very Best,Shell
But in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version.
Quote from: FattyLumpkin on 08/23/2016 09:12 pmFor Anyone re the above question....Hypothetical: two frustums +/- the same size and volume etc. one with flat end plates the other with spherical. By what % (+/-) does the "Q" increase in the spherical frustum over the flat endplate frustum? Thanks anyone, FLQ increases with spherical end-plates. I am working on illustrating this via simulations. The end-plates need to be set up like a concave-convex optical cavity. Also, just slapping spherical end-plates onto your flat-end frustum will yield a different resonance. It has to be built from the ground up with spherical end-plates in mind.
For Anyone re the above question....Hypothetical: two frustums +/- the same size and volume etc. one with flat end plates the other with spherical. By what % (+/-) does the "Q" increase in the spherical frustum over the flat endplate frustum? Thanks anyone, FL
Quote from: Monomorphic on 08/23/2016 10:01 pmQuote from: FattyLumpkin on 08/23/2016 09:12 pmFor Anyone re the above question....Hypothetical: two frustums +/- the same size and volume etc. one with flat end plates the other with spherical. By what % (+/-) does the "Q" increase in the spherical frustum over the flat endplate frustum? Thanks anyone, FLQ increases with spherical end-plates. I am working on illustrating this via simulations. The end-plates need to be set up like a concave-convex optical cavity. Also, just slapping spherical end-plates onto your flat-end frustum will yield a different resonance. It has to be built from the ground up with spherical end-plates in mind.Can you expand on this simulation and what frequency and what antenna you did this in?Thanks!Shell
Quote from: SeeShells on 08/23/2016 10:23 pmQuote from: Monomorphic on 08/23/2016 10:01 pmQuote from: FattyLumpkin on 08/23/2016 09:12 pmFor Anyone re the above question....Hypothetical: two frustums +/- the same size and volume etc. one with flat end plates the other with spherical. By what % (+/-) does the "Q" increase in the spherical frustum over the flat endplate frustum? Thanks anyone, FLQ increases with spherical end-plates. I am working on illustrating this via simulations. The end-plates need to be set up like a concave-convex optical cavity. Also, just slapping spherical end-plates onto your flat-end frustum will yield a different resonance. It has to be built from the ground up with spherical end-plates in mind.Can you expand on this simulation and what frequency and what antenna you did this in?Thanks!ShellThese sims are of TheTravellers dims for a TE013 emdrive. ~2.4Ghz. I am working on designing a TE013 frustum with spherical end-plates that resonates at ~2.46Ghz. I am using a simple dipole antenna with side-wall injection.
Quote from: WarpTech on 08/23/2016 12:24 am...the objective would be to have asymmetrical power fluctuations within the copper frustum. Absorption, emission and dissipation. Dissipative process are not conservative and the copper is not a perfect conductor. There is dissipation involved and the asymmetry of the frustum may be allowing this to create thrust. Modeling this is not as easy though, because you would be modeling the kinetic energy of the copper atoms, not the MW field inside the frustum.Quote"What we're doing is the extreme case of nonlinear optics, where the light and matter are coupled so strongly that we don't have light and matter anymore. We have something in between, called a polariton.""What we depend on is the vacuum fluctuation. Vacuum, in a classical sense, is an empty space. There's nothing. But in a quantum sense, a vacuum is full of fluctuating photons, having so-called zero-point energy. These vacuum photons are actually what we are using to resonantly excite electrons in our cavity." ~http://phys.org/news/2016-08-merge-quantum-coupling.htmlAny similarities and/or correlations with your theory? Zero-Point Energy resonantly exciting electrons in a cavity making those electrons behave as a single gigantic atom? Perhaps the polaritons could be creating more focused asymmetrical power fluctuations in the copper?The researches claim that they're achieving coupling of vacuum Rabi splitting as large as 10 percent of the photon energy. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but 10% sounds like pretty strong coupling to me!
...the objective would be to have asymmetrical power fluctuations within the copper frustum. Absorption, emission and dissipation. Dissipative process are not conservative and the copper is not a perfect conductor. There is dissipation involved and the asymmetry of the frustum may be allowing this to create thrust. Modeling this is not as easy though, because you would be modeling the kinetic energy of the copper atoms, not the MW field inside the frustum.
"What we're doing is the extreme case of nonlinear optics, where the light and matter are coupled so strongly that we don't have light and matter anymore. We have something in between, called a polariton.""What we depend on is the vacuum fluctuation. Vacuum, in a classical sense, is an empty space. There's nothing. But in a quantum sense, a vacuum is full of fluctuating photons, having so-called zero-point energy. These vacuum photons are actually what we are using to resonantly excite electrons in our cavity." ~http://phys.org/news/2016-08-merge-quantum-coupling.html
...Meberbs: We may understand time dilation (a time duration) as the integration of a dynamic process. Would this integration be possible without its first derivative, a time rate, suggested here as 1/T? ...and yes. Momentum is conserved. ....”Things accelerating without bound”: I guess so. In a G field, we always end up hitting the source (Earth). But if the source of the field is moving with you ....?...I have work on this “different perspective” and wrote a paper (attached). Read it all. This is not the maths, but it is the thinking.Marcel,
Something that strikes me as interesting is if the vacuum is really a superposition of anti-matter and matter. Supposing a bonded pair has the same charge but the anti-matter counterpart behaves as if it has the opposite charge because time is reversed then they will behave as opposite charges but annihilate each other and yet they still exist. That is coming together means they cause a great disturbance in the QV which is the light created when they annihilate? If anti-matter really runs backwards in time and separating them causes a gradient in the time field then inducing a gradient in the time field may be as simple as charging a capacitor to a really high voltage. That is some charge on one plate will have an effect of slowing down time while the other would speed it up. This reminds me of WaiteDavidMSPhysics on youtube.com's videos here where he specifically addresses a charged capacitor effecting space time and find that it could induce a gradient in space time.: I would suggest listinging to 34:00 where he specifically says either negative or positive charge will behave as if it has exotic matter properties which I think means negative energy properties. Possibly like the anti-mater in the QV with time slowing effects? That is one of the charges on the capacitor might attract the anti matter? But then again there are both types of charges for anti-matter but maybe one charge of anti-matter is more massive than the other?
Something that strikes me as interesting is if the vacuum is really a superposition of anti-matter and matter.
Cannae's cavity looks much different than many of the DIYers here, who have been going more of the frustum Shawyer route. I'm wondering, now that Cannae is ~apparently~ trying to put their money where their mouth is and planning to put a demo cube sat in orbit, has anyone reconsidered their approach? Purely curious here, still watching all of this anxiously.
Mberbs: Thank you for reading the attachment and for the comments. The logical causal structure, for a higher probability of existence in one direction, that I derived from simple logic is exactly the one found in the Alcubierre drive. I could be wrong ... but it doesn’t look that way. I do maintain that this causal structure is what we are trying to achieve here. How does that translate into an actual device? I will start my own DIY work ... slowly. Quick stupid question: why is everyone using a torsion pendulum and laser instead of an accelerometer (cheap and USD data ready)? Actual force measurements?Thanks,Marcel,
- Ok torsional pendulum for measurement = quantitative, precise. But a simple accelerometer like the ADXL (MEMS) can show acceleration/gravity in g = as a first go/no-go or qualitative signal?