Author Topic: F9/Crew Dragon : Polaris Dawn : KSC LC-39A : 10 Sep 2024 (09:23 UTC) DISCUSSION  (Read 414612 times)

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6826
  • California
  • Liked: 8540
  • Likes Given: 5487


SpaceFlightNow has provided some details:


- Launch in November
- The EVA will be with two astronauts.


https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/02/14/billionaire-plans-three-more-flights-with-spacex-culminating-in-starship-mission/

It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.

Offline Michael S

  • Member
  • Posts: 86
  • Liked: 48
  • Likes Given: 89
With Inspiration4, the purchased price of the flight was never(to my knowledge) fully disclosed; only that it was less than $200 million.  I am trying to wrap my head around the costs with these flights.
These flights are definitely more than just: Up - orbit a few days - Land.  With each flight, new limits are being set and new hardware is being built and flown.
Are the Polaris missions paid for completely by Isaacman, or are they joint ventures between SpaceX and Isaacman, where they are sharing the costs?

Offline rpapo

With Inspiration4, the purchased price of the flight was never(to my knowledge) fully disclosed; only that it was less than $200 million.  I am trying to wrap my head around the costs with these flights.
These flights are definitely more than just: Up - orbit a few days - Land.  With each flight, new limits are being set and new hardware is being built and flown.
Are the Polaris missions paid for completely by Isaacman, or are they joint ventures between SpaceX and Isaacman, where they are sharing the costs?
Both sides stand to gain, so there could well have been a deal struck.
Following the space program since before Apollo 8.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14957
  • UK
  • Liked: 4326
  • Likes Given: 220
Quote
The first flight, which could come by the end of the year, will aim to send a crew of four farther than any other human spaceflight in 50 years

So they go far but not as far as the Moon (would have required FH). Minimum apogee to meet this is goal is maybe 600km?

The DearMoon project does have the goal of going farther than ever before.

Could they be going for the Gemini 11 record of 1,300 km?  Not sure how much margin the F9 has for Crew Dragon launches. 

Two of the Crew members where/are SpaceX employees.  Is SpaceX allowing the two employees to temporarily take a sabbatical to do the mission and then come back to SpaceX after it is over?  Would be smart if they did allow this type of flexibility because it would only bring more experience to SpaceX for potential future missions, IE Crewed Mars missions.

Really looking forward to the mission and hopefully another Netflix series!!!!   
Can’t F9 get Crew Dragon up to maximum of a 1000 Km orbit?
« Last Edit: 02/14/2022 03:25 pm by Star One »

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8428
  • Liked: 7223
  • Likes Given: 3010
Quote
The first flight, which could come by the end of the year, will aim to send a crew of four farther than any other human spaceflight in 50 years

So they go far but not as far as the Moon (would have required FH). Minimum apogee to meet this is goal is maybe 600km?

The DearMoon project does have the goal of going farther than ever before.

Could they be going for the Gemini 11 record of 1,300 km?  Not sure how much margin the F9 has for Crew Dragon launches. 

Two of the Crew members where/are SpaceX employees.  Is SpaceX allowing the two employees to temporarily take a sabbatical to do the mission and then come back to SpaceX after it is over?  Would be smart if they did allow this type of flexibility because it would only bring more experience to SpaceX for potential future missions, IE Crewed Mars missions.

Really looking forward to the mission and hopefully another Netflix series!!!!   
Can’t F9 get Crew Dragon up to maximum of a 1000 Km orbit?

LSP website says the payload to 1300 km circular is 12,270 kg, which is right around what Crew Dragon masses. Payload to an elliptical orbit would be a bit higher, though. F9 might be able to push an apogee nearer 2000 km.

Dragon also has a lot of onboard propellant available for maneuvering, too.

Offline kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1595
  • Somewhere on the boat
  • Liked: 1877
  • Likes Given: 1264
With Inspiration4, the purchased price of the flight was never(to my knowledge) fully disclosed; only that it was less than $200 million.  I am trying to wrap my head around the costs with these flights.
These flights are definitely more than just: Up - orbit a few days - Land.  With each flight, new limits are being set and new hardware is being built and flown.
Are the Polaris missions paid for completely by Isaacman, or are they joint ventures between SpaceX and Isaacman, where they are sharing the costs?
Both sides stand to gain, so there could well have been a deal struck.
My thinking is the Starship flight is 100% on SpaceX as it has to be done anyway. The other two probably have a deal done - they have to “field test” their EVA suits so this is one way of benefiting both sides.

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17076
  • N. California
  • Liked: 17316
  • Likes Given: 1493

Don't know about you, but someone leading astronaut training program and mission director having actual spaceflight experience makes absolute sense. Should be almost a job requirement ;)

Not really, trainers and directors in other fields don't require it. 

Over a 150 space missions, where done without it.

... and because in the past, at NASA, it was done without it, it's not a good idea?   

What's the opposite of progress?  The post above.
« Last Edit: 02/14/2022 03:59 pm by meekGee »
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14957
  • UK
  • Liked: 4326
  • Likes Given: 220
Quote
The first flight, which could come by the end of the year, will aim to send a crew of four farther than any other human spaceflight in 50 years

So they go far but not as far as the Moon (would have required FH). Minimum apogee to meet this is goal is maybe 600km?

The DearMoon project does have the goal of going farther than ever before.

Could they be going for the Gemini 11 record of 1,300 km?  Not sure how much margin the F9 has for Crew Dragon launches. 

Two of the Crew members where/are SpaceX employees.  Is SpaceX allowing the two employees to temporarily take a sabbatical to do the mission and then come back to SpaceX after it is over?  Would be smart if they did allow this type of flexibility because it would only bring more experience to SpaceX for potential future missions, IE Crewed Mars missions.

Really looking forward to the mission and hopefully another Netflix series!!!!   
Can’t F9 get Crew Dragon up to maximum of a 1000 Km orbit?

LSP website says the payload to 1300 km circular is 12,270 kg, which is right around what Crew Dragon masses. Payload to an elliptical orbit would be a bit higher, though. F9 might be able to push an apogee nearer 2000 km.

Dragon also has a lot of onboard propellant available for maneuvering, too.
That certainly sounds like the safety margins would be reduced but from the sound of it Polaris is all about stretching the human space flight envelope.

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19222
  • Liked: 8641
  • Likes Given: 3511


SpaceFlightNow has provided some details:


- Launch in November
- The EVA will be with two astronauts.


https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/02/14/billionaire-plans-three-more-flights-with-spacex-culminating-in-starship-mission/

It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.

How would you get out of the capsule if the cupola is there? Through the door? David Naggy speculated on Twitter that there might be a third type of attachment with a door for EVA purposes.
« Last Edit: 02/14/2022 03:52 pm by yg1968 »

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19222
  • Liked: 8641
  • Likes Given: 3511
With Inspiration4, the purchased price of the flight was never(to my knowledge) fully disclosed; only that it was less than $200 million.  I am trying to wrap my head around the costs with these flights.
These flights are definitely more than just: Up - orbit a few days - Land.  With each flight, new limits are being set and new hardware is being built and flown.
Are the Polaris missions paid for completely by Isaacman, or are they joint ventures between SpaceX and Isaacman, where they are sharing the costs?
Both sides stand to gain, so there could well have been a deal struck.

My guess is that Isaacman pays for himself and his employee but not for the SpaceX's employees.
« Last Edit: 02/14/2022 03:40 pm by yg1968 »

Offline kdhilliard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
  • Kirk
  • Tanstaa, FL
  • Liked: 1657
  • Likes Given: 4601
Are the FAA licensing requirements different if Gillis and Menon fly as SpaceX employees (company astronauts) as opposed to private guests of Isaacman while on leave of absence (or even vacation!) from work?

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14957
  • UK
  • Liked: 4326
  • Likes Given: 220
This flight is going to be a bonanza of medical information I mean only a handful of men have previously flown that high and no women. And no one has done it in the ‘digital’ medical era.

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8428
  • Liked: 7223
  • Likes Given: 3010
Are the FAA licensing requirements different if Gillis and Menon fly as SpaceX employees (company astronauts) as opposed to private guests of Isaacman while on leave of absence (or even vacation!) from work?

The FAA requirements are easier to meet for crew than for passengers, so if anything, flying as SpaceX employees should be easier. But Isaacman is a passenger, so SpaceX needs to meet that bar anyway. It's not like the FAA requirements are anything approaching stringent, so it really shouldn't make much of a difference.
« Last Edit: 02/14/2022 04:28 pm by envy887 »

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6826
  • California
  • Liked: 8540
  • Likes Given: 5487


SpaceFlightNow has provided some details:


- Launch in November
- The EVA will be with two astronauts.


https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/02/14/billionaire-plans-three-more-flights-with-spacex-culminating-in-starship-mission/

It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.

How would you get out of the capsule if the cupola is there? Through the door? David Naggy speculated on Twitter that there might be a third type of attachment with a door for EVA purposes.

Obviously there will be an EVA hatch instead of a cupola on this flight, sorry for the poor phrasing. We already know that a dragon can be equipped with either 1) a docking hatch, or 2) a cupola. I was just wondering if the 3rd option might have been an EVA hatch or some sort of EVA airlock (maybe inflatable). But it appears to be an EVA hatch.

EDIT: Another neat option might have been an airlock module in the trunk (attached to the 2nd stage for stability?), so just like an Apollo mission the Dragon would rotate and dock with it. But the mass of such an airlock module would preclude them from a higher LEO orbit.
« Last Edit: 02/14/2022 04:01 pm by Lars-J »

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14957
  • UK
  • Liked: 4326
  • Likes Given: 220


SpaceFlightNow has provided some details:


- Launch in November
- The EVA will be with two astronauts.


https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/02/14/billionaire-plans-three-more-flights-with-spacex-culminating-in-starship-mission/

It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.

How would you get out of the capsule if the cupola is there? Through the door? David Naggy speculated on Twitter that there might be a third type of attachment with a door for EVA purposes.

Obviously there will be an EVA hatch instead of a cupola on this flight, sorry for the poor phrasing. We already know that a dragon can be equipped with either 1) a docking hatch, or 2) a cupola. I was just wondering if the 3rd option might have been an EVA hatch or some sort of EVA airlock (maybe inflatable). But it appears to be an EVA hatch.
I am guessing that it’s an issue in the reporting that makes it sound like it will be flown without an EVA hatch which made no sense to me when I read that.

Offline butters

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2423
  • Liked: 1736
  • Likes Given: 622
It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.
Are IVA suits, erm, suitable for several hours in an unpressurized environment? The IVA crew would have to remain seated with severely restricted mobility while the pressure bladders are inflated, enough to operate the control console with significant effort but not much more. At the end of the spacewalk, the EVA crew would have to close the hatch and conduct any physical leak check procedures without assistance from the IVA crew. At least give the IVA crew a hot-mic mode for the intercom so they don't get sore thumbs from having to operate the push-to-talk button all day in pressurized gloves. Space-to-ground they'll just have to deal with it.

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19222
  • Liked: 8641
  • Likes Given: 3511


SpaceFlightNow has provided some details:


- Launch in November
- The EVA will be with two astronauts.


https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/02/14/billionaire-plans-three-more-flights-with-spacex-culminating-in-starship-mission/

It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.

How would you get out of the capsule if the cupola is there? Through the door? David Naggy speculated on Twitter that there might be a third type of attachment with a door for EVA purposes.

Obviously there will be an EVA hatch instead of a cupola on this flight, sorry for the poor phrasing. We already know that a dragon can be equipped with either 1) a docking hatch, or 2) a cupola. I was just wondering if the 3rd option might have been an EVA hatch or some sort of EVA airlock (maybe inflatable). But it appears to be an EVA hatch.

EDIT: Another neat option might have been an airlock module in the trunk (attached to the 2nd stage for stability?), so just like an Apollo mission the Dragon would rotate and dock with it. But the mass of such an airlock module would preclude them from a higher LEO orbit.

The mission patch provides another clue as it shows an astronaut attached to the front of the capsule:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/polarisprogramphotos/51880377678/
« Last Edit: 02/14/2022 04:23 pm by yg1968 »

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19222
  • Liked: 8641
  • Likes Given: 3511

Offline whitelancer64



SpaceFlightNow has provided some details:


- Launch in November
- The EVA will be with two astronauts.


https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/02/14/billionaire-plans-three-more-flights-with-spacex-culminating-in-starship-mission/

It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.

How would you get out of the capsule if the cupola is there? Through the door? David Naggy speculated on Twitter that there might be a third type of attachment with a door for EVA purposes.

Obviously there will be an EVA hatch instead of a cupola on this flight, sorry for the poor phrasing. We already know that a dragon can be equipped with either 1) a docking hatch, or 2) a cupola. I was just wondering if the 3rd option might have been an EVA hatch or some sort of EVA airlock (maybe inflatable). But it appears to be an EVA hatch.

EDIT: Another neat option might have been an airlock module in the trunk (attached to the 2nd stage for stability?), so just like an Apollo mission the Dragon would rotate and dock with it. But the mass of such an airlock module would preclude them from a higher LEO orbit.

Obviously, there wouldn't be a cupola. Just depressurize the capsule and open the forward hatch. There is no special EVA hatch.

The image shows someone in what looks like an IVA suit with an umbilical, so there would be no airlock.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1595
  • Somewhere on the boat
  • Liked: 1877
  • Likes Given: 1264
From the press conference  - EVA  suit not yet started but will be a combination of EVA and launch suit. EVA will be through the forward hatch with no airlock.
« Last Edit: 02/14/2022 04:29 pm by kevinof »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0