Total Members Voted: 120
Voting closed: 07/16/2022 01:09 am
Starship also had other delays, such as mountains of paperwork, and lots of hoops to jump through at Boca Chica with the various government agencies. The first version, had they obtained the permitting, probably could have already launched.
In the meantime while waiting on permitting, they developed Raptor 2 and increased the number of engines on the base of the booster. They have also started a launch mount at Cape Kennedy, to avoid permitting problems, and are building a factory in Florida. SLS required no new factories to be built. Just a new transporter due to its huge mass.
I agree, this thread should be locked. A good long range pole should be, which one will outlast the other.
I voted for Starship. I thought SLS would be delayed (it was). But I thought a full stack Starship prototype would have flown by now. I would say I underestimated the time it takes to build the pad infrastructure (stage zero).
Quote from: rockets4life97 on 11/17/2022 01:39 pmI voted for Starship. I thought SLS would be delayed (it was). But I thought a full stack Starship prototype would have flown by now. I would say I underestimated the time it takes to build the pad infrastructure (stage zero).The need for SpaceX to get approval from FAA to operate the Starship rocket from the Starbase meant that the SLS flew first. We'll see if the first orbital Starship flight is successful.