Quote from: Kabloona on 06/25/2015 06:29 pmQuote from: AJW on 06/25/2015 06:23 pmThat video re-raises the question whether the video was captured by a quad or some other camera platform. The article refers to a 'tracking camera' and I find it unlikely that a quad would have followed the duration of re-entry that accurately.Why wouldn't it be a hexacopter as used for Grasshopper/F9R videos?Compare the CRS-6 footage to the chase-plane footage taken during the Cassiope re-entry. This is a monster telephoto lens, not one you would find even on a heavily modified quad. Would you develop a new system using a quad or simply hire the same company that has the aircraft, cameras, and crew that captured Cassiope successfully? Tracking a Grasshopper hop is a completely different critter than a re-entry.
Quote from: AJW on 06/25/2015 06:23 pmThat video re-raises the question whether the video was captured by a quad or some other camera platform. The article refers to a 'tracking camera' and I find it unlikely that a quad would have followed the duration of re-entry that accurately.Why wouldn't it be a hexacopter as used for Grasshopper/F9R videos?
That video re-raises the question whether the video was captured by a quad or some other camera platform. The article refers to a 'tracking camera' and I find it unlikely that a quad would have followed the duration of re-entry that accurately.