Подготовка к транспортировке, транспортировка, сопровождение РН «Союз-2-1а» для запуска КА «Канопус-В-ИК» в эксплуатирующую организацию и возврат спецтранспорта на предприятие Головного исполнителя
Подготовка и запуск РН «Союз-2-1a» и РБ «Фрегат» с КА «Канопус-В-ИК». Проведение послепусковых работ.
Создание космического комплекса оперативного мониторинга техногенных и природных чрезвычайных ситуаций и космической системы на его основе в составе двух космических аппаратов (в части работ по созданию и запуску КА «Канопус-В-ИК»)
РКН: КА «Канопус-В-ИК», РН « Союз-2-1а»Дата запуска: 4 кв. 2015Страховая сумма (лимит ответственности) млн.руб.: 1 594,00Страховая премия (максимальный тариф) млн.руб.: 11,1
Launch: satellite Kanopus-V-IK, rocket Soyuz-2-1aLaunch date: 4th quarter of 2015The sum insured (limit of liability), million ruble: 1 594,00Insurance premium (maximum tariff), million ruble: 11,1
Оказание услуг по транспортировке (доставке) ракеты-носителя «Союз-2-1а» для запуска КА «Канопус-В-ИК»
Подготовка к авиаперевозке, транспортировка на аэродром, авиаперевозка РБ «Фрегат» с ПхО и ГО 14С737 для запуска КА «Канопус-В-ИК», транспортировка в Байконурский филиал ФГУП «НПО им. С.А. Лавочкина»
Затраты по данной статье на 2015 год составляют 223,0 тыс.руб. и предусмотрены на страхование груза в период транспортировки (0,056% от себестоимости изделий по ГК от 09.04.2013г. № 361-С022/13/132 – 69 813,3 тыс.руб. и ГК от 16.05.2011г. № 361-1188/11 – 328 466,0 тыс.руб., в соответствии с п. 3.4 Требований к транспортировке РБ «Фрегат» с ПхО и ГО 14С737 для запуска КА «Канопус-В-ИК»).
do you know if they might fly secondary payloads with Kanopus-V-IK so extra ballast wont be needed because of switch to more capable launcher??edit: nevermind
An article in the May 11 SpaceNews says that "Aquila Space, the firm responsible for building, launching and operating satellites in the Landmapper constellations, plans to send the first two spacecraft into sun-synchronous orbit Feb. 26 on a Soyuz rocket from Kazakhstan’s Baikonur Cosmodrome. Aquila Space obtained the launch contract through JSC Glavkosmos, an affiliate of the Russian space agency, Roscosmos, that arranges flight opportunities for secondary payloads."These may be 6U or 16 U cubesats.Any idea which launch? and which February 26? Progress MS-2 (No. 432) is the only Soyuz launch in February of 2016, but that's not sun synchronous.
Quote from: Comga on 05/22/2015 05:20 amShould that launch then be moved to 2016-02-26?Yes, if they really fly with Kanopus-V-IK. Launch of four satellites from SatByul Co. LTD was also ordered through Glavkosmos.Another variant is that they will fly with Meteor-M No. 2-1, but I doubt.
Should that launch then be moved to 2016-02-26?
проведение работ в обеспечение запуска КА «AISSat-3» в качестве попутной полезной нагрузки с КА «Канопус-В-ИК».проведение работ в обеспечение запуска КА «Corvus-BC» в качестве попутной полезной нагрузки с КА «Канопус-В-ИК».проведение работ в обеспечение запуска ПН «Lemur+» в качестве попутной полезной нагрузки с КА «Канопус-В-ИК».проведение работ в обеспечение запуска ПН «Tyvak» в качестве попутной полезной нагрузки с КА «Канопус-В-ИК».
The Federal Space Agency has issued a tender for the delivery of a Fregat upper stage and 14С737 fairing to the launch site.QuoteПодготовка к авиаперевозке, транспортировка на аэродром, авиаперевозка РБ «Фрегат» с ПхО и ГО 14С737 для запуска КА «Канопус-В-ИК», транспортировка в Байконурский филиал ФГУП «НПО им. С.А. Лавочкина»12 293 600 Russian rubleSchedule of completion by 25th December 2015.http://www.zakupki.gov.ru/epz/order/notice/ok44/view/common-info.html?regNumber=0173100007015000054Originally a Rokot was going to be used to launch this satellite, but has now been moved to a Soyuz-2-1a.http://fcs.vpk.ru/cgi-bin/uis/gk.cgi/ExtDataGk/View/3949178?class_suffix=GkI think the tender identifies where they found a rocket. In the documentation is this paragraph:-QuoteЗатраты по данной статье на 2015 год составляют 223,0 тыс.руб. и предусмотрены на страхование груза в период транспортировки (0,056% от себестоимости изделий по ГК от 09.04.2013г. № 361-С022/13/132 – 69 813,3 тыс.руб. и ГК от 16.05.2011г. № 361-1188/11 – 328 466,0 тыс.руб., в соответствии с п. 3.4 Требований к транспортировке РБ «Фрегат» с ПхО и ГО 14С737 для запуска КА «Канопус-В-ИК»).It makes reference to the contracts for Rezonans.http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=32950.msg1102022#msg1102022№ 361-С022/13/132http://www.zakupki.gov.ru/epz/contract/contractCard/common-info.html?reestrNumber=0173100007011000314№ 361-1188/11http://www.zakupki.gov.ru/epz/contract/contractCard/common-info.html?reestrNumber=0173100007013000151
оказание услуги по согласованию возможности присвоения радиочастот для космических аппаратов «AISSat-3», «Flock-2k», «Lemur+», «Tyvak», «Corvus-BC», запускаемых в качестве попутной полезной нагрузки с КА «Канопус–В–ИК» с учетом состояния координации частотных присвоений спутниковых сетей с отечественными спутниковыми сетями
1.1 Основание для выполнения работы: контракт № 1240214045 от 19.06.2015 между SFL Inc. (Норвегия/Канада) с одной стороны, и ОАО «Главкосмос» с другой стороны (далее по тексту контракт № 1240214045);контракт № 55 от 29.06.2015 между Planet Labc Inc. (США) с одной стороны, и ОАО «Главкосмос» с другой стороны (далее по тексту контракт № 55);контракт № 56 от 24.07.2015 между ECM GmbH. (Германия) с одной стороны, и ОАО «Главкосмос» с другой стороны (далее по тексту контракт № 56);контракт № 57 от 24.07.2015 между ECM GmbH. (Германия) с одной стороны, и ОАО «Главкосмос» с другой стороны (далее по тексту контракт № 57);контракт № 49 от 22.07.2015 между Aquila Space Inc. (США) с одной стороны, и ОАО «Главкосмос» с другой стороны (далее по тексту контракт № 49);
QuoteThird quarter – Kanopus-V-IK, Zond, Zvezda, Four satellites from SatByul Co. LTD, Two Corvus-BC, AISSat-3, Lemur+, Tyvark, MKA Mayak, МKA-N, Flock-2k – Soyuz-2-1A/Fregat-M – Baikonur, 31/6Looks like this launch is scheduled for November 2016, according to CEO of "Dauria Aerospace" (manufacturer of two MKA-N sats):http://tass.ru/kosmos/3335592- "... we hope for a November launch ... From Baikonur, along with Kanopus V IK "
Third quarter – Kanopus-V-IK, Zond, Zvezda, Four satellites from SatByul Co. LTD, Two Corvus-BC, AISSat-3, Lemur+, Tyvark, MKA Mayak, МKA-N, Flock-2k – Soyuz-2-1A/Fregat-M – Baikonur, 31/6
According to ECM (link) the launch is planned Q2 2017.
April 29 - EchoStar-21June 29 - Kanopus-V-IKhttp://www.interfax.ru/russia/552008
Сегодня на космодром Байконур доставлен космический аппарат «Канопус-В-ИК». Пуск запланирован на 14 июля 2017 г
- three, buildt by students, - Iskra-MAI- 85 [Искра-МАИ-85]
Quote from: Olaf on 06/15/2017 10:15 am- three, buildt by students, - Iskra-MAI- 85 [Искра-МАИ-85]Any relation to DOSAAF-85?
According to Roscosmos there are 72 small satellites (from 1U-cubesat to a satellite with 120kg) on board, including five Russians.The foreign satellites are from USA, Germany, Japan, Canada and Norway.The Russians are- two MKA-N [МКА-Н]- three, buildt by students, - Iskra-MAI- 85 [Искра-МАИ-85] - Mayak [Маяк] - Ecuador UTE-YuZGU [Эквадор UTE-ЮЗГУ]https://www.roscosmos.ru/23665/
Quote from: Steven Pietrobon on 06/15/2017 10:28 amQuote from: Olaf on 06/15/2017 10:15 am- three, buildt by students, - Iskra-MAI- 85 [Искра-МАИ-85]Any relation to DOSAAF-85?Unlikely, as Iskra-MAI-85 is 3U Cubesat
From Plan of Russian space launches (part 2), updated January 30, 2016:Second quarter – Kanopus-V-IK, Zond, Zvezda, Four satellites from SatByul Co. LTD, Two Corvus-BC, AISSat-3, Lemur+, Tyvark, MKA Mayak, МKA-N, Flock-2k – Soyuz-2-1A/Fregat-M – Baikonur, 31/6Posted by Vladislav Gooba on Seesat-l on January 28, 2016:OT: Some details about Russian amateur Mayak satelliteThe satellite will carry 4x 4-meter metallized membrane reflectors with 95% reflectivity, and its visual magnitude as the satellite tumbles may peak at -10!See his post for more details.
"We fight so hard for dark skies in and around our planet,” Nick Howes, an astronomer and former deputy director of the Kielder Observatory in Northumberland, told IFLScience. “To see this being potentially ruined by some ridiculous crowdfunded nonsense makes my heart simply despair.”
Alex Shaenko, the project leader, told IFLScience previously that it “will not be a problem,” adding that there “are a lot of spacecraft flying in the night sky, some even brighter than Mayak.” That’s true to an extent, but a lot of these can be easily tracked and corrected for.
A good question we need to ask is: Do we really need a space mirror?The Soviet Union did plan to build these in order to illuminate cold Siberian cities with less light during the winter, and to improve farm production... So they researched this during 70s and 80s, and implemented the Znamya project in 90s.Apparently the Mayak creators have nothing to do with the original goals of the projects. They just want this as a public stunt. Which in itself is good.The one thing I wonder is... why a space mirror, why not test Solar Sailing?
move for live coverage?
Quote from: DatUser14 on 07/13/2017 08:28 pmmove for live coverage?Typically they will move it once inside 24 hours until launch.
Quote from: russianhalo117 on 07/13/2017 08:35 pmQuote from: DatUser14 on 07/13/2017 08:28 pmmove for live coverage?Typically they will move it once inside 24 hours until launch.I guess the other, unspoken part of the question is...will the launch be web cast live? That usually is the other determinant for move to live coverage.That of Kanopus-V 1 was, and was covered here in this thread: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=19512.0
Some of the cubesats.
Soyuz launch customers search for cause of cubesat failuresby Debra Werner — August 29, 2017SAN FRANCISCO – Four of the 72 miniature satellites sent into orbit July 14 on a Russian Soyuz 2.1a rocket alongside the primary customer, the Kanopus-V-IK Russian Earth-imaging satellite, are not responding to commands from their operators and two additional cubesats are not in their intended orbits. [...]
Article about unresponsive cubesats from July 14 launchhttp://spacenews.com/additional-cubesats-on-july-14-soyuz-flight-are-unresponsive/
Quote from: Lewis007 on 09/05/2017 06:52 amArticle about unresponsive cubesats from July 14 launchhttp://spacenews.com/additional-cubesats-on-july-14-soyuz-flight-are-unresponsive/unclean deployments despite report of nominal telemetry??
<snip>Also, Mayak cannot respond to command because it lacks command receiver as well as telemetry system.<snip>
Quote from: Liss on 08/30/2017 07:04 pm<snip>Also, Mayak cannot respond to command because it lacks command receiver as well as telemetry system.<snip> I was meaning to ask about this.What?Why would the Mayak owners or sponsors launch an incomplete satellite that apparently is guaranteed not to work?(I imagine the worldwide professional astronomy community is secretly happy.)
SpaceNews previously reported that the Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI) Iskra-MAI-85 cubesat was one of the satellites that failed. That report is contradicted by an Aug. 23 MAI announcement, saying “The Iskra-MAI-85 satellite repeatedly conducted communication sessions with the MAI Flight Control Center in July and August 2017 and continues to solve the tasks assigned to it.”MAI did not respond to requests for comment on the current status of the cubesat.
Not-nominal: We lost 2 satellitesThe 2 satellites we launched in July are officially unresponsive and today we decided to direct all our team’s energy towards our launch next month and declaring both Landmapper-BC1 and Landmapper-BC2 satellites lost. This ends 6 weeks of trying to resuscitate the satellites, who’s ability to transmit data back to earth was compromised since deployment. This means we’re facing the similar fate of Dauria Aerospace’s two MKA-N satellites, Moscow Aviation Institute’s Iskra-MAI-85, and Moscow State University’s Cosmo Mayak who were all on the Soyuz rocket bay with the suspected anomaly. While our satellites are tested to withstand insane stress on launch the suspected launch anomalies like what was reported by Space News could have generated conditions in excess of what most satellites plan for which, could have fried our key electronics — even systems hardened for the extremes of space.Before losing contact, our ops team verified functioning subsystems — solar panels, antenna deployment, power system, attitude sensors — so we are moving fast on doing the final testing and assembly for our launch in November. While this loss costs us 4 months of time, we will launch again soon and by the spring be able to be back at planned capacity. Lots of love to the amazing team over the last few weeks trying everything to work around what ultimately is a hardware failure out of their control. We’ve been quoting Elon a lot lately — space is hard.
According to a space industry executives from a different company, Starr paid the claim after Astro Digital presented telemetry documents from Glavkosmos, the subsidiary of Russian state space corporation Roscosmos that arranged the small satellite launches. Those documents showed that one of two attitude control thrusters on the Fregat upper stage failed to fire but instead pumped out hydrazine, which exploded when the second thruster fired.Since the July 14 Soyuz launch, when 72 small satellites traveled to orbit alongside Russian Earth imaging satellite Kanopus-V-IK, satellite engineers and insurance executives have been struggling to understand what happened because at least nine cubesats stored in one area of the Fregat upper stage never responded to commands from their operators while the vast majority of satellites launched on the rocket worked as designed.For months after the launch, students at Moscow State University, whose Mayak cubesat also failed, investigated possible causes. After attempting to replicate launch conditions and analyzing information on the Fregat and the fate of cubesats stored alongside Mayak, the students determined “Mayak and other failed satellites put into orbit with an approximate apogee of 600 kilometer have failed because of the ingress of decomposition products of hydrazine from one or more low-thrust liquid engines, used in the reactive control system of the upper stage Fregat,” Claudia Kitova, a Mayak spacecraft engineer, said by email.
Testing the plasma thrusters for orbit control, presumably.