Author Topic: FAILURE: Astra Rocket 3.1 - Kodiak - September 12, 2020 (03:19 UTC)  (Read 62182 times)

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33694
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 22848
  • Likes Given: 4316
[email protected]
35s
T-5 minutes. Final Range is GO!

twitter.com/Astra/status/1304619656829792257
« Last Edit: 09/12/2020 03:16 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33694
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 22848
  • Likes Given: 4316
Re: Astra Rocket 3.1 - Kodiak - September 12, 2020 (~03:20 UTC)
« Reply #121 on: 09/12/2020 03:19 am »
[email protected]
42s
T-60 seconds! Rocket is on internal control

twitter.com/Astra/status/1304620520516665349
« Last Edit: 09/12/2020 03:20 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33694
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 22848
  • Likes Given: 4316
Re: Astra Rocket 3.1 - Kodiak - September 12, 2020 (~03:20 UTC)
« Reply #122 on: 09/12/2020 03:20 am »
[email protected]
51s
T-0 LIFT OFF!

twitter.com/Astra/status/1304620705422610432
« Last Edit: 09/12/2020 03:21 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline gmbnz

  • Member
  • Posts: 50
  • New Zealand
  • Liked: 40
  • Likes Given: 10
Re: Astra Rocket 3.1 - Kodiak - September 12, 2020 (~03:20 UTC)
« Reply #123 on: 09/12/2020 03:25 am »
I think we're supposed to have had MECO / state separation / S2 ignition.... hopefully I'm just being impatient but the (twitter) silence is ominous...

Edit: but it's still fantastic they got to launch!
« Last Edit: 09/12/2020 03:26 am by gmbnz »

Online Rocketdog2116

  • Member
  • Posts: 59
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 282
Re: Astra Rocket 3.1 - Kodiak - September 12, 2020 (~03:20 UTC)
« Reply #124 on: 09/12/2020 03:26 am »
Seco will be at +8:51 if we don't hear anything by T+10 minutes we'll know

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33694
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 22848
  • Likes Given: 4316
Re: Astra Rocket 3.1 - Kodiak - September 12, 2020 (~03:20 UTC)
« Reply #125 on: 09/12/2020 03:27 am »
Not unexpected, but it didn't make it.

[email protected]
22s
Successful lift off and fly out, but the flight ended during the first stage burn. It does look like we got a good amount of nominal flight time. More updates to come!

twitter.com/Astra/status/1304622467042820105
« Last Edit: 09/12/2020 03:28 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Online Rocketdog2116

  • Member
  • Posts: 59
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 282
Re: Astra Rocket 3.1 - Kodiak - September 12, 2020 (~03:20 UTC)
« Reply #126 on: 09/12/2020 03:27 am »
RIP Rocket 3.1

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9021
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 5531
  • Likes Given: 50633
Thanks, Steven, for the live coverage.

And a sincere "Better Luck Next Time" to Astra!
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.)
My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!"

Offline gmbnz

  • Member
  • Posts: 50
  • New Zealand
  • Liked: 40
  • Likes Given: 10
Was that rocket the same one which they were planning on launching for DARPA or was it a new one? (I seem to remember something about the other one having an incident on the pad / during testing some time after the DARPA attempt?)

Looking at the positive side:
* They've proven that they're still one of the top two contenders for next company to orbit along with VO
* (presumably) no pad damage this time
* More flight data and operations experience!

I do find it a little concerning that they've launched 3 rockets and are still struggling to get to MECO - on the other hand, maybe this iterative progress is planned. Hopefully this performance is good enough to convince investors to stick with them.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33694
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 22848
  • Likes Given: 4316
Was that rocket the same one which they were planning on launching for DARPA or was it a new one? (I seem to remember something about the other one having an incident on the pad / during testing some time after the DARPA attempt?)

Yes, Rocket 3.0 was destroyed on 23 March during a ground accident. Rocket 3.1 is its replacement.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33694
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 22848
  • Likes Given: 4316
[email protected]
29s
Great shot of Rocket 3.1 leaving the pad!

twitter.com/Astra/status/1304626075251556353
« Last Edit: 09/12/2020 03:42 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline butters

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2379
  • Liked: 1633
  • Likes Given: 555
Was that rocket the same one which they were planning on launching for DARPA or was it a new one? (I seem to remember something about the other one having an incident on the pad / during testing some time after the DARPA attempt?)
That rocket popped open during a fueling test and was damaged beyond repair. Wasn't the first time they spilled a bunch of kerosene on Kodiak Island. This is, of course, the former stealth startup known only by its federally-mandated environmental remediation documents filed following incidents. Hopefully this time the debris made it out to sea.

Offline ShaunML09

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 205
  • Florida
  • Liked: 853
  • Likes Given: 475
Some amateur video of the launch/failure ...who seem strangely eager to help after the rocket explosion

https://twitter.com/CultonJennifer/status/1304626860853141505

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6415
  • Liked: 9048
  • Likes Given: 885
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1304627336470384640

Quote
Sorry to hear that. I’m sure you’ll figure it out though. Took us four launches to reach orbit. Rockets are hard.

https://twitter.com/Kemp/status/1304631756683841537

Quote
Thanks Elon!  Digging into the data so we can figure this out. Rocket 3.2 is ready to go...
« Last Edit: 09/12/2020 04:55 am by su27k »

Offline jamesh9000

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 183
From the video two posts above, it detonates 9 seconds into the video, and I'd estimate about 15 seconds into flight. I know they weren't expecting to reach orbit, and they'll put a brave face on it, but i'd say they've got to be a bit disappointed with only 15 seconds.

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6631
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 1587
  • Likes Given: 1508
Does it seem to anyone else like the flight termination system was triggered by ... contact with Earth's surface?
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7055
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 3692
  • Likes Given: 2960
Some amateur video of the launch/failure ...who seem strangely eager to help after the rocket explosion



I took the video and cropped it.  Can't really see the vehicle after engine shutdown but you can see the vehicle for about three seconds before crashing.


Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33694
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 22848
  • Likes Given: 4316
Cropped screen grabs. Vehicle flew for at least 10 seconds before losing thrust and crashing back on Earth. The second photo shows the point where thrust has nearly terminated.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35483
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 61767
  • Likes Given: 27498
twitter.com/astra/status/1304636706784645120

Quote
We are excited to have made a ton of progress on our first of three attempts on our path to orbit! We are incredibly proud of our team; we will review the data, make changes and launch Rocket 3.2, which is nearly complete.

📸: @johnkrausphotos

https://twitter.com/peter_j_beck/status/1304668087027867655

Quote
Data in this game is so hard won, so big congratulations to the team for pulling down actual flight data from today’s attempt!

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33694
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 22848
  • Likes Given: 4316
[email protected]
2h
We are excited to have made a ton of progress on our first of three attempts on our path to orbit! We are incredibly proud of our team; we will review the data, make changes and launch Rocket 3.2, which is nearly complete. @johnkrausphotos

twitter.com/Astra/status/1304636706784645120
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement SkyTale Software GmbH
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1