Author Topic: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12  (Read 967864 times)

Offline Tangilinear Interjar

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 423
  • California
  • Liked: 759
  • Likes Given: 27
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1900 on: 05/21/2023 06:58 pm »
The deluge system will apparently be pressurized by high-pressure gas to a pressure of about 12 bar at the orifices. This is a "head" of about 400 feet. To get the equivalent using a water tower, you need a tower about 400 feet high positioned near the OLM.

But wait! SpaceX already has a 400-ft tower near the OLM. Why not just just put a big water tank at the top? It should be cheaper to operate and probably cheaper to build than the gas pressurization system. You need the same amount of energy to pump the water as you need to compress the gas, but pumping water up to load the tank is almost certainly much cheaper and is logistically simpler. You probably need a pipe less than 1 m in diameter to do the deluge, and the bottom sections of that pipe must handle the entire 12 bar. A smaller pipe can be used to pump the water up, and pumping water up 400 feet is routine.

How would you get said water tank up there?
With a crane. That's how they got all the other stuff up there. If you don't want to rent the super-big Leibart, then erect a small hoist on the top of the tower. Use multiple smaller tanks as they are doing on the ground now. You can also build it in place. For future towers, plan a single larger tank as part of the initial build. Note that big water tanks are a well-understood technology. The bottom of a 33-foot tall tank on top of the tower is only at 2 bar, not at the 12 bar of the pressurized tanks on the ground.

I'd bet that just the cost of the crane mob/de-mob to place the equipment that far up the tower far exceeds the cost of the air pressurization system that they are building.

And they already have one and know how to use it. https://twitter.com/rocketjunkie94/status/1636456017281130496?t=fWnjksW1pe-RTrhnxT1FZw&s=19

Offline CMac

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 167
  • Ireland
  • Liked: 95
  • Likes Given: 10
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1901 on: 05/22/2023 03:21 pm »
The colour temperature of the mist cloud around the steel plate, would that represent the temperature of the plate? Most of the light seems to be coming from the area where the white-out spot (saturated exposure) is.
The mist colour temperature looks like about 900 to 1000 C.
I'm not an expert, but I think the rocket exhaust bounces off the stagnation surface where the exhaust pressure matches the steam pressure. This is not the temperature of the plate.

Ok, that seems to be reasonable. Under high pressure, the steam has a high emissivity so it would be fairly opaque.

I think that the colour of  the clouds away from the exhaust will be close to the colour of the steam near(ish) the surface, e.g. 5 cm (wild guess). I don't think the combustion emissions are playing a large part in this colour since the colour stays fairly constant while the flame is quite variable in intensity.
So at the stagnation front, a colour representing around 900 C (maybe a bit lower). Then that would represent an upper bound on the temperature of the plate. Plate temperature could be a lot cooler, given that there is probably a good flow of water/steam at the surface.

Edit to add: just after the engine cut-off, as the water is seen starting to emerge from the plate, the surface of the plate has no glow at all. If there was a high temperature on the plate, you'd expect some afterglow, even if very brief.
« Last Edit: 05/22/2023 03:28 pm by CMac »

Online DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4292
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 3413
  • Likes Given: 1283
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1902 on: 05/22/2023 04:16 pm »
The colour temperature of the mist cloud around the steel plate, would that represent the temperature of the plate? Most of the light seems to be coming from the area where the white-out spot (saturated exposure) is.
The mist colour temperature looks like about 900 to 1000 C.
I'm not an expert, but I think the rocket exhaust bounces off the stagnation surface where the exhaust pressure matches the steam pressure. This is not the temperature of the plate.
Ok, that seems to be reasonable. Under high pressure, the steam has a high emissivity so it would be fairly opaque.

I think that the colour of  the clouds away from the exhaust will be close to the colour of the steam near(ish) the surface, e.g. 5 cm (wild guess). I don't think the combustion emissions are playing a large part in this colour since the colour stays fairly constant while the flame is quite variable in intensity.
So at the stagnation front, a colour representing around 900 C (maybe a bit lower). Then that would represent an upper bound on the temperature of the plate. Plate temperature could be a lot cooler, given that there is probably a good flow of water/steam at the surface.

Edit to add: just after the engine cut-off, as the water is seen starting to emerge from the plate, the surface of the plate has no glow at all. If there was a high temperature on the plate, you'd expect some afterglow, even if very brief.
The WAG by forum members here is the plume pressure near the plate will be 12 bar. Water boils at 188 C at 12 bar. I think the plate will not exceed this temperature, but that most of the plume will be reflected from the stagnation surface without being cooled. A small part of the heat energy will create the steam and the rest will stay in the diverted plume.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1903 on: 05/22/2023 10:32 pm »

Offline alugobi

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1191
  • Liked: 1296
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1904 on: 05/22/2023 11:54 pm »
They removed the insulated cryo pipe.  It looked beat up, like some rocket stuff got inside.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1905 on: 05/23/2023 05:56 am »
https://twitter.com/labpadre/status/1660778733429567490

Quote
Things are very fluid on the launch pad.
Watch live: youtube.com/live/tS2PHJmvJ…
 
 #SpaceX #Starbase #Starship #superheavy

Offline litton4

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 531
  • Liked: 344
  • Likes Given: 114
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1906 on: 05/23/2023 10:04 am »

The WAG by forum members here is the plume pressure near the plate will be 12 bar. Water boils at 188 C at 12 bar. I think the plate will not exceed this temperature, but that most of the plume will be reflected from the stagnation surface without being cooled. A small part of the heat energy will create the steam and the rest will stay in the diverted plume.


WAG? In the UK that means "Wives and Girlfriends", usually associated with football players.
Dave Condliffe

Online Exastro

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 144
  • USA
  • Liked: 131
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1907 on: 05/23/2023 11:57 am »

The WAG by forum members here is the plume pressure near the plate will be 12 bar. Water boils at 188 C at 12 bar. I think the plate will not exceed this temperature, but that most of the plume will be reflected from the stagnation surface without being cooled. A small part of the heat energy will create the steam and the rest will stay in the diverted plume.


WAG? In the UK that means "Wives and Girlfriends", usually associated with football players.
"Wild-Ass Guess", as distinct from a SWAG, which is a Scientific Wild-Ass Guess.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1908 on: 05/23/2023 02:08 pm »

Offline cgorton

  • Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Opelika, Al
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 0

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8033
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 5022
  • Likes Given: 4326
Tony De La Rosa

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1911 on: 05/27/2023 04:11 am »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1912 on: 05/27/2023 04:13 am »
Progress is good:

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1662263704262680577

Quote
Major launchpad upgrades should be complete in about a month, then another month of rocket testing on pad, then flight 2 of Starship

Offline alugobi

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1191
  • Liked: 1296
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1913 on: 05/27/2023 03:49 pm »
So, probably 3-5 months.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1914 on: 05/27/2023 11:05 pm »
https://twitter.com/ashleykillip/status/1662552262676471808

Quote
so much work at Starbase. We have seen sheet piles being driven into the ground these will form a retaining wall that can then be excavated to work on the pipe for the water and install the steel watercooled plates

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1915 on: 05/28/2023 03:24 pm »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1916 on: 05/29/2023 03:17 pm »
https://twitter.com/rgvaerialphotos/status/1663202537170694146

Quote
We spotted the new steel plates, what do you think these will be used for?

We have a possible answer and render by @mcrs987 explaining these in our latest flyover update: youtu.be/3RPtBAET3Yw

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1917 on: 05/30/2023 07:47 am »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 42803
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 73025
  • Likes Given: 32791
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1918 on: 05/30/2023 03:36 pm »

Offline abaddon

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2896
  • Liked: 3636
  • Likes Given: 4787
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 12
« Reply #1919 on: 05/30/2023 08:11 pm »
How's about we get back to SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates, please?

Tags: OLIT 
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1