Based on Mary's photos from yesterday, it looks like the three short pieces of the OLIT are going to be lifted individually and then cross supports installed. Guess they were not setup well for preassembly and lifting. We'll get to see a lot of crane work with this bit. Also interesting, if you look close at those pieces, the tops are capped with just a small hole for (presumably) concrete filling. There are also some interesting flanges at different spots than usual so it looks like there will be some other structures mounted in the top of the tower.
Based on Mary's photos from yesterday, it looks like the three short pieces of the OLIT are going to be lifted individually and then cross supports installed.
Quote from: StuffOfInterest on 07/21/2021 12:25 pmBased on Mary's photos from yesterday, it looks like the three short pieces of the OLIT are going to be lifted individually and then cross supports installed. Per latest RGV flyover (photos/video not yet public) there is an assembly jig sitting right next to the tower with the Section 9 columns. Looks like it will be pre-assembled next to the tower before lift. Presumably just to clear up that area of the old gas-well site for other uses.
... Has there been any sign of parts that could be the external "carriage" that everyone (myself included) seems to think will be built on the outside of the OLIT to carry whatever grabber claw they'll use to lift/mount Starship and possibly catch SuperHeavy? The more lightly built black lattice structure that RGV saw almost looks like it could be the beginnings of the claw itself.
Where is this foundation is being laid down?https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=52398.0;attach=2047719;imageIt can't be the Launch site, right? because the barrel section is visible on the left and is placed on the ground and on the Launch site we just have BN3, GSE1, and GSE2, all of them are on some kind of platform (as per their requirement).[Seems BN2.1 to me]
#SpaceX Orbital Launch Tower Assembly Progress as of 22nd July 2021 6pm CSTMon-Wed:- Detached crane from 8th level. - Removed 1 scaffolding from 6th and 7th level.Thursday:- Roof Segment started, 3 columns + 4 beams added.- Removed 1 scaffolding from 3rd, 4th, 5th level.
For sections 1 through 8 of the OLIT, between two adjacent vertical columns a series of horizonal beams are bolted.Diagonal braces are then bolted from the middle of a beam *upwards* to a column.Section 9 is different.The diagonal braces are bolted from the middle of a beam *downwards* to a column.I think this means something that will experience great downward force will be added on top of section 9.What else could it be? Or is this just how these towers are topped?Or could it not matter structurally, but look better this way?
A lot of people are speculating that the tubular structures being assembled at the launch site will be part of the catching mechanism but so far there is no clear confirmation.Any particular reason they would be welding tubes instead of the more traditional girder shapes making up the launch tower?
Quote from: 492 on 07/23/2021 01:06 amFor sections 1 through 8 of the OLIT, between two adjacent vertical columns a series of horizonal beams are bolted.Diagonal braces are then bolted from the middle of a beam *upwards* to a column.Section 9 is different.The diagonal braces are bolted from the middle of a beam *downwards* to a column.I think this means something that will experience great downward force will be added on top of section 9.What else could it be? Or is this just how these towers are topped?Or could it not matter structurally, but look better this way?The "missing" corner (i.e., the one with the ledge built around it at the top of section 8 ) has plates for the same (more or less) diagonal beams as the other three corners. Two of the horizontal beams have been installed, while the gusset plates on the columns suggest the other two horizontal beams are coming, but since the "missing column" doesn't go that high, these will need to be half-length. It would be pretty hard to do this in a sensible way without reversing the slope of the diagonals. See attached (very poor) sketch. I'm expecting the black configuration. If they were trying to keep the diagonals the same, they'd end up with something like the red sketch which (to my non-expert eye at least) seems structurally sub-optimal.