I would think with modern electronics there's no need for two separate COMINT and TELINT satellites and they can be folded into one system. Those 70s satellites predated microprocessor electronics, after all.
Quote from: LittleBird on 12/12/2025 05:04 pmIt *may* even explain why even 60 odd years later the two dishes on Orion seem to be one of roughly RHYOLITE size, and one of roughly CANYON size, see https://satelliteobservation.net/2017/09/24/a-radiotelescope-in-the-sky-the-usa-202-orion-satellite/ though there's no reason to believe one is now exclusively for COMINT and one for TELINT.Length 1 is off. The Titan IV fairing was 16.7 feet in diameter so it could hold a 15 foot diameter payload with rattle space. A true octagon with a 15' diagonal would have a side of 13.9' (4.2m). A true square with a 15' diagonal would have a side of 10.6' (3.2m). The bus is closer to the true octagon than square. Plus the bus in the image looks oblong, so there is some distortion.
It *may* even explain why even 60 odd years later the two dishes on Orion seem to be one of roughly RHYOLITE size, and one of roughly CANYON size, see https://satelliteobservation.net/2017/09/24/a-radiotelescope-in-the-sky-the-usa-202-orion-satellite/ though there's no reason to believe one is now exclusively for COMINT and one for TELINT.
First thing to note is that a 20ft dish, scaled down from the packaged size of the later ATS-6 variant, neatly explains how CANYON was squeezed into the rather narrow 5 ft diameter Agena shroud, in stark contrast to the very long nose needed for RHYOLITE's dish-described by an eyewitness as a "French umbrella".
Quote from: LittleBird on 12/12/2025 05:04 pm... and because I don't actually expect to live long enough to see it declassified and am still curious (though I hope to be wrong about that) Have patience, remember it wasn't very long ago that the initial 60s ELINT programs were declassified (well ok GRAB was 1998). The 70s will be gotten to eventually I'm sure, while also noting that declassifying anything isn't free and it does take time, money, and personnel. Then consider the interesting fact that CANYON was publicly acknowledged as far back as 1990 while POPPY wasn't until 2012 (why, who knows?)
... and because I don't actually expect to live long enough to see it declassified and am still curious (though I hope to be wrong about that)
The smaller dish antenna resembles somewhat the TDRS single access antenna in size relative to the bus - a large, steerable dish on the satellite that provides high-bandwidth, direct communication links. So it might be related to the additional relay function of the later ORION satellites.
Quote from: LittleBird on 12/12/2025 03:47 pmFirst thing to note is that a 20ft dish, scaled down from the packaged size of the later ATS-6 variant, neatly explains how CANYON was squeezed into the rather narrow 5 ft diameter Agena shroud, in stark contrast to the very long nose needed for RHYOLITE's dish-described by an eyewitness as a "French umbrella". I see closer to 30 ft as a simple umbrella.
Quote from: WallE on 12/14/2025 08:26 pmI would think with modern electronics there's no need for two separate COMINT and TELINT satellites and they can be folded into one system. Those 70s satellites predated microprocessor electronics, after all.It wasn't electronics, it was pointing and location that drove separate spacecraft programs. Telemetry transmitters are usually omnidirectional. Comm signals like microwaves can be directional.