Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : USSF-44 : KSC LC-39A: 1 Nov 2022 (13:41 UTC)  (Read 264659 times)

Offline Alexphysics

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1624
  • Spain
  • Liked: 6029
  • Likes Given: 952
OK, that's confusing. The comment says Oct 31, 6:44 AM. Then the follow up comment says the time is wrong.
I'm planning on visiting and watching this launch/landing, but I'm getting the vibe that no one really knows when this is currently scheduled. I'll keep checking back for further info.

Well I said it's wrong because I do know the launch time is not 6:44am EDT. Also Ben Cooper states on his website (https://www.launchphotography.com/Launch_Viewing_Guide.html) the launch is late in the morning EDT which tracks with what I've heard as well.

Offline JAFO

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1114
    • My hobby
  • Liked: 950
  • Likes Given: 1095
OK, for those of us coming down, which would be a better spot: Jetty Park or Rocket Launch View Point?


TIA
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

Online ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8617
  • Argyle, TX
  • Liked: 2503
  • Likes Given: 2171
OK, for those of us coming down, which would be a better spot: Jetty Park or Rocket Launch View Point?


TIA


For the side booster landings, I suggest Jetty Park. It's the closest one can be from both Landing Zones.
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline JAFO

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1114
    • My hobby
  • Liked: 950
  • Likes Given: 1095
OK, for those of us coming down, which would be a better spot: Jetty Park or Rocket Launch View Point?


TIA


For the side booster landings, I suggest Jetty Park. It's the closest one can be from both Landing Zones.
Thanks. WADR, my fingers are crossed for a 3 day delay so I can make it.
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

Offline Jakusb

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1208
  • NL
  • Liked: 1223
  • Likes Given: 637
OK, for those of us coming down, which would be a better spot: Jetty Park or Rocket Launch View Point?


TIA


For the side booster landings, I suggest Jetty Park. It's the closest one can be from both Landing Zones.
Thanks. WADR, my fingers are crossed for a 3 day delay so I can make it.
I have been to the first FH launch and watched it from jetty park pier. You can definitely see the side boosters coming down, but there is a berm blocking the view for the final part of the landing. I heard of highway 401 over Indian river might be a better view. No berm on that side and also much better view for liftoff.
At least that is what I heard.

Offline TrueBlueWitt

  • Space Nut
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2248
  • Mars in my lifetime!
  • DeWitt, MI
  • Liked: 300
  • Likes Given: 488
OK, for those of us coming down, which would be a better spot: Jetty Park or Rocket Launch View Point?


TIA


For the side booster landings, I suggest Jetty Park. It's the closest one can be from both Landing Zones.
Thanks. WADR, my fingers are crossed for a 3 day delay so I can make it.
I have been to the first FH launch and watched it from jetty park pier. You can definitely see the side boosters coming down, but there is a berm blocking the view for the final part of the landing. I heard of highway 401 over Indian river might be a better view. No berm on that side and also much better view for liftoff.
At least that is what I heard.


I spent the money for the Feel the Heat tickets at the Viewing Center for Arabsat-6. Good for the launch, but less than ideal for the boosters. Next go around, I was thinking about just seeing how the view from The Tiki Bar at Cocoa Beach? Which would be far less painful if ends up being another case of multiple SCRUBs! ;)

Offline leetdan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
  • Space Coast
  • Liked: 323
  • Likes Given: 288
I have been to the first FH launch and watched it from jetty park pier. You can definitely see the side boosters coming down, but there is a berm blocking the view for the final part of the landing. I heard of highway 401 over Indian river might be a better view. No berm on that side and also much better view for liftoff.
At least that is what I heard.


You aren't allowed to park along the side of 401 like you used to, but there is a designated viewing area at the end of the road which is administered by the SF Base.  That too was closed for a while due to COVID, but I expect it would be open for this launch.

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13758
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 9172
  • Likes Given: 92465
NextSpaceFlight, updated October 18:
Launch NET October 31
« Last Edit: 10/18/2022 06:10 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline ChrisC

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
  • Atlanta GA USA
  • Liked: 2077
  • Likes Given: 2303
Well, there goes my trip.
PSA #1: Suppress forum auto-embed of Youtube videos by deleting leading 'www.' (four characters) in YT URL; useful when linking text to YT, or just to avoid bloat.
PSA #2: EST does NOT mean "Eastern Time".  Use "Eastern" or "ET" instead, all year round, and avoid this common error.  Google "EST vs EDT".  *** See profile for two more tips. ***

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57641
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94710
  • Likes Given: 44749
https://twitter.com/alexphysics13/status/1582769598696656896

Quote
The strongback at LC-39A is being raised to pick up the reaction frame. This is in preparation for Falcon Heavy's next flight in just under two weeks. Soon, the whole Transporter-Erector will go horizontal and roll back to the integration hangar.

nsf.live/spacecoast

Offline lenny97

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 123
  • Pescara, Abruzzo - Italy
  • Liked: 241
  • Likes Given: 235
https://twitter.com/alexphysics13/status/1582769598696656896

Quote
The strongback at LC-39A is being raised to pick up the reaction frame. This is in preparation for Falcon Heavy's next flight in just under two weeks. Soon, the whole Transporter-Erector will go horizontal and roll back to the integration hangar.

nsf.live/spacecoast



https://twitter.com/Alexphysics13/status/1582770581015269377
Quote
Once at the integration hangar SpaceX teams will install the Falcon Heavy rocket onto the T/E ahead of a potential static fire early next week.
Founder of www.spacevoyaging.com — Independent Space News Blog
I'm based in Pescara, Italy. Music addicted.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57641
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94710
  • Likes Given: 44749

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57641
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 94710
  • Likes Given: 44749
https://twitter.com/tgmetsfan98/status/1582842338409615360

Quote
The T/E at LC-39A did a throwback test before being lowered back to horizontal. Still needs to go vertical once more to pick up the reaction frame before rolling back to the hangar.

nsf.live/spacecoast

Offline JAFO

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1114
    • My hobby
  • Liked: 950
  • Likes Given: 1095
Well, there goes my trip.


Sorry bro, but it makes mine. Buy you a shirt if I see any.
« Last Edit: 10/19/2022 11:52 pm by JAFO »
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

Offline GWR64

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1994
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1975
  • Likes Given: 1238
I think this belongs here now. (perhaps) USUVL again  :-\
Quote
USN support of the geosynchronous test spacecraft
USUVL from USN’s Hawaiian earth station.
The spacecraft will be launched on or about October 28th, 2022 on a Falcon
Heavy from the Kennedy Space Center. USUVL will rideshare on the vehicle
with an unspecified US military spacecraft. USUVL will be injected into super-
sync orbit on or about January 9 th 2023 at which time USN will begin S-band
support. The spacecraft is inclined at 2.8 degrees as to minimize potential
interference with other geo spacecraft. The operators of USUVL have begun and
will coordinate with other operators as to not cause interference as it moves
around the geo-belt.
Nominal Injection TLE
USUVL
1 00100U 10001A 21365.00000000 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 14
2 00100 002.8169 340.9193 0000209 322.2077 038.0557 00.99036864 16

Edit, so now, a permanent link   ::)
SES-STA-20221011-01097

« Last Edit: 10/20/2022 08:40 pm by GWR64 »

Offline mlindner

  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3020
  • Space Capitalist
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Liked: 2434
  • Likes Given: 907
I think this belongs here now. (perhaps) USUVL again  :-\
Quote
USN support of the geosynchronous test spacecraft
USUVL from USN’s Hawaiian earth station.
The spacecraft will be launched on or about October 28th, 2022 on a Falcon
Heavy from the Kennedy Space Center. USUVL will rideshare on the vehicle
with an unspecified US military spacecraft. USUVL will be injected into super-
sync orbit on or about January 9 th 2023 at which time USN will begin S-band
support. The spacecraft is inclined at 2.8 degrees as to minimize potential
interference with other geo spacecraft. The operators of USUVL have begun and
will coordinate with other operators as to not cause interference as it moves
around the geo-belt.
Nominal Injection TLE
USUVL
1 00100U 10001A 21365.00000000 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 14
2 00100 002.8169 340.9193 0000209 322.2077 038.0557 00.99036864 16

Edit, so now, a permanent link   ::)
SES-STA-20221011-01097

Why's this saying October 28th versus this thread saying October 31st?
LEO is the ocean, not an island (let alone a continent). We create cruise liners to ride the oceans, not artificial islands in the middle of them. We need a physical place, which has physical resources, to make our future out there.

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10894
  • US
  • Liked: 15170
  • Likes Given: 6719
The dates in the FCC filings are not always current

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9006
  • Liked: 4953
  • Likes Given: 768
I think this belongs here now. (perhaps) USUVL again  :-\
Quote
USN support of the geosynchronous test spacecraft
USUVL from USN’s Hawaiian earth station.
The spacecraft will be launched on or about October 28th, 2022 on a Falcon
Heavy from the Kennedy Space Center. USUVL will rideshare on the vehicle
with an unspecified US military spacecraft. USUVL will be injected into super-
sync orbit on or about January 9 th 2023 at which time USN will begin S-band
support. The spacecraft is inclined at 2.8 degrees as to minimize potential
interference with other geo spacecraft. The operators of USUVL have begun and
will coordinate with other operators as to not cause interference as it moves
around the geo-belt.
Nominal Injection TLE
USUVL
1 00100U 10001A 21365.00000000 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 14
2 00100 002.8169 340.9193 0000209 322.2077 038.0557 00.99036864 16

Edit, so now, a permanent link   ::)
SES-STA-20221011-01097

Why's this saying October 28th versus this thread saying October 31st?
Starting on the original date through the end of the approved window date range. Essentially the filing gives "NLT" January 9th 2023 ZULU Time before the listed contract agreement needs a filed extension. The rideshare must nominally reach its testing orbit by the 9th.
« Last Edit: 10/21/2022 01:32 am by russianhalo117 »

Offline lenny97

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 123
  • Pescara, Abruzzo - Italy
  • Liked: 241
  • Likes Given: 235
Ben Cooper, updated:


Quote
The next SpaceX launch will be a Falcon Heavy carrying USSF-44 for the U.S. Space Force from pad 39A on October 31 in the late morning EDT.
Founder of www.spacevoyaging.com — Independent Space News Blog
I'm based in Pescara, Italy. Music addicted.

Offline TJL

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1425
  • Liked: 139
  • Likes Given: 199
Is there a reason why SpaceX is not assigning a "used" booster for the core since there are no plans to recover it after launch?
Seems odd to discard a brand new engine.
Thank you.
« Last Edit: 10/21/2022 11:59 am by TJL »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1