Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Transporter 2 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 30 June 2021 (19:31 UTC)  (Read 330976 times)

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10894
  • US
  • Liked: 15170
  • Likes Given: 6719
48962    GHALIB   2021-059CM
48943    QMR-KWT   2021-059BS

Not yet identified on Space-track.org: PACE-1 (6U), Painani-II (3U)

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10894
  • US
  • Liked: 15170
  • Likes Given: 6719
https://twitter.com/isis_space/status/1456279180404998149
Quote
We've completed the platform commissioning of the #GHALIB satellite, a 2U built, designed and integrated by us, and our customer Marshall Intech has supplied the #RadioFrequency payload. We're now ready to support payload commissioning operations! #CubeSats #pioneerforchange

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10894
  • US
  • Liked: 15170
  • Likes Given: 6719
48909    PACE-1   2021-059AG
48928    PAINANI-2   2021-059BB

Offline Craftyatom

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 652
  • Software!
  • Arizona, USA
  • Liked: 721
  • Likes Given: 9170
LINCS A/B were deployed from the Surfboard.  They are alive but tumbling, activities underway to try and recover them.  Mandrake sats are doing good so far, as is the SDA payload on YAM-3. (from Space Symposium press briefing)

(Surfboard deployments don't seem to have a great success rate on these missions for some reason)

Space Development Agency, General Atomics eye options after setback in laser comms experiment
Quote from: SpaceNews
SDA said in a statement Feb. 4 that there were “challenges communicating with the LINCS sats. However, SDA is still working in partnership with the performer General Atomics on the way ahead.”

[...]

Gregg Burgess, vice president of space systems at General Atomics, said a problem occurred at launch. “Unfortunately, there was an issue with the launch vehicle,” Burgess said on a Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies podcast that aired Feb. 5.
I'm assuming "launch vehicle" in this case is the Surfboard aggregator rather than the Falcon 9, but that's just a guess.
All aboard the HSF hype train!  Choo Choo!

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10894
  • US
  • Liked: 15170
  • Likes Given: 6719
LINCS A/B were deployed from the Surfboard.  They are alive but tumbling, activities underway to try and recover them.  Mandrake sats are doing good so far, as is the SDA payload on YAM-3. (from Space Symposium press briefing)

(Surfboard deployments don't seem to have a great success rate on these missions for some reason)

Space Development Agency, General Atomics eye options after setback in laser comms experiment
Quote from: SpaceNews
SDA said in a statement Feb. 4 that there were “challenges communicating with the LINCS sats. However, SDA is still working in partnership with the performer General Atomics on the way ahead.”

[...]

Gregg Burgess, vice president of space systems at General Atomics, said a problem occurred at launch. “Unfortunately, there was an issue with the launch vehicle,” Burgess said on a Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies podcast that aired Feb. 5.
I'm assuming "launch vehicle" in this case is the Surfboard aggregator rather than the Falcon 9, but that's just a guess.

Launch vehicle is Falcon 9.  He could be referring to the issue with the high helium concentration for payloads mounted in that area, which some of the passengers don't seem to have realized would be a problem until it was too late.

Online Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6637
  • Liked: 4801
  • Likes Given: 5906
LINCS A/B were deployed from the Surfboard.  They are alive but tumbling, activities underway to try and recover them.  Mandrake sats are doing good so far, as is the SDA payload on YAM-3. (from Space Symposium press briefing)

(Surfboard deployments don't seem to have a great success rate on these missions for some reason.

Space Development Agency, General Atomics eye options after setback in laser comms experiment
Quote from: SpaceNews
SDA said in a statement Feb. 4 that there were “challenges communicating with the LINCS sats. However, SDA is still working in partnership with the performer General Atomics on the way ahead.”
[...]

Gregg Burgess, vice president of space systems at General Atomics, said a problem occurred at launch. “Unfortunately, there was an issue with the launch vehicle,” Burgess said on a Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies podcast that aired Feb. 5.

I'm assuming "launch vehicle" in this case is the Surfboard aggregator rather than the Falcon 9, but that's just a guess.

Launch vehicle is Falcon 9.  He could be referring to the issue with the high helium concentration for payloads mounted in that area, which some of the passengers don't seem to have realized would be a problem until it was too late.

gongora lead me to some posts that explained this thoroughly.
The “Surfboard” cubesat launcher sits on the aft end of Stage 2. As such it inside the interstage, which fills with vented helium at some low partial pressure. The helium diffuses into components, particularly MEMS, which fail at remarkably low levels.
This post from Almoturg links to a marvelous video showing this in great detail.

Apparently some sensors and materials are sensitive to helium in particular.  It was noted by some people at the symposium that MEMS sensors can be a problem with helium, and other materials could change properties if saturated with helium.

MEMS oscillators in particular are affected by helium:

There was a case of a bunch of iPhones in a hospital shutting down when an MRI magnet was cooled down with liquid helium.

Edit:  It’s no more “an issue with the launcher” than if the cubesats succumbed to the launch vibration or decompression rate. The helium is in the environmental specifications and the cubesat designers overlooked it. This stuff happens, but it isn’t right to try and shift the blame.
« Last Edit: 02/07/2022 05:34 pm by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Can't help but wonder if over time the Helium will diffuse back out and restore functionality. It is a hard vacuum.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline thirtyone

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Liked: 437
  • Likes Given: 357
Those devices often do restore themselves. Unfortunately if they needed the MEMS devices for things like attitude control and stationkeeping, you might wonder what the software might end up doing if all the IMUs are reading crazy values for a few days.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10894
  • US
  • Liked: 15170
  • Likes Given: 6719
CACI Announces Successful Demonstration of Optical Intersatellite Links in Low Earth Orbit

Company Release - 5/17/2022
Industry first for new technology designed to support the National Defense Space Architecture

RESTON, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI) announced today it successfully demonstrated space to space optical communications links in low earth orbit (LEO) in partnership with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Space Development Agency (SDA) as part of the Mandrake II program.

Mandrake II is a joint risk-reduction program with DARPA, SDA and the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate (AFRL/RV) to evaluate the pointing, acquisition, and tracking algorithms that allow for optical communication terminals to establish and maintain high-speed communication links in the upcoming Blackjack and SDA Transport and Tracking Layer constellations. This successful test, completed using CACI’s CrossBeam free-space optical terminals, is the first step in establishing more secure, space-based communications networks for defense agencies using more powerful, efficient technology that can transmit more data, faster.

In December 2021, CACI acquired California-based SA Photonics to address a broader market spanning high-end manned flight programs to the proliferated LEO market. The combined companies offer the most advanced photonics engineering and manufacturing capabilities in the U.S. with three major manufacturing facilities in California, Florida, and New Jersey.

John Mengucci, CACI President and Chief Executive Officer, said, “Our national security depends on advanced, secure technology that enables modernized networks and enhanced intelligence systems for our warfighters using small satellites to operate at the speed of relevance. Through the acquisition of SA Photonics, our joint technology and manufacturing capabilities have enabled this successful milestone. In partnership with our mission customers, we are on the path to supporting the contested space domain with faster, more secure satellites.

The Optical InterSatellite Links (OISLs) were established using CrossBeam free-space optical terminals currently on orbit, developed by SA Photonics, with satellites that are specifically aimed at demonstrating and supporting a communication capability for the Department of Defense’s proliferated LEO (p-LEO) National Defense Space Architecture (NDSA).

The CrossBeam OISLs on Mandrake II successfully established an optical link during a 40+ minute test on April 14. The link demonstrated closed loop tracking and data transfer over a 100+ km link distance, with more than 200 gigabits (Gb) of data transmitted and received.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10894
  • US
  • Liked: 15170
  • Likes Given: 6719
SAT-STA-20230810-00200

Quote
During the initial portion of this period, Spaceflight actively lowered the altitude of the spacecraft from its deployment altitude of ~522 km to ~445 km and also engaged with NASA to physically coordinate the transit of the Sherpa-LTE1 through the ISS orbit. Spaceflight learned that actively transiting through the ISS orbit would be more complicated and demanding than Spaceflight had anticipated, and Spaceflight would not have on call sufficient operational resources during the transit period to meet NASA standards.

As a result, and consistent with NASA recommendations, Spaceflight has decided not to actively de-orbit Sherpa-LTE1 through the ISS orbit. Instead, the company will allow the spacecraft to passively de-orbit through the ISS orbit down to approximately 410 km....

Once at the 410 km orbital altitude, Spaceflight will commence actively de-orbiting the Sherpa-LTE1 in coordination with NASA.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0