Tsyklon-4 maiden flight will be launched August, 2011.Japanese Nano-JASMINE satellite (35kg) will be launched this flight as piggy back payload. Officially confirmed this launch contract.http://www.jasmine-galaxy.org/nano/nano-en.html
Quote from: Fuji on 04/12/2010 08:25 amTsyklon-4 maiden flight will be launched August, 2011.Japanese Nano-JASMINE satellite (35kg) will be launched this flight as piggy back payload. Officially confirmed this launch contract.http://www.jasmine-galaxy.org/nano/nano-en.htmlIt should be noted that this payload is intended for a sun synchronous orbit, whereas Cyclone 4 is designed for GTO missions.
Quote from: Danderman on 04/12/2010 02:28 pmQuote from: Fuji on 04/12/2010 08:25 amTsyklon-4 maiden flight will be launched August, 2011.Japanese Nano-JASMINE satellite (35kg) will be launched this flight as piggy back payload. Officially confirmed this launch contract.http://www.jasmine-galaxy.org/nano/nano-en.htmlIt should be noted that this payload is intended for a sun synchronous orbit, whereas Cyclone 4 is designed for GTO missions.Although Tsiklon-4 can provide a small GTO capacity of only 1600 kg, there is virtually no market for this class. The prime usage of Tsiklon-4 will be for LEO and SSO payloads.
GTO ambition.
Quote from: Salo on 04/12/2010 08:15 pmGTO ambition. If this were really true, there would be no hope for Alcantara, since Cyclone can be launched to SSO from Russia or Kazakhstan. I would suspect that the real reason for the development of Alcantara is launch to GTO, but its not clear if the Ukrainians will be able to afford development of both a new launch site and a heavily modified LV.
Although Tsiklon-4 can provide a small GTO capacity of only 1600 kg, there is virtually no market for this class. The prime usage of Tsiklon-4 will be for LEO and SSO payloads.
Quote from: Skyrocket on 04/12/2010 02:41 pmAlthough Tsiklon-4 can provide a small GTO capacity of only 1600 kg, there is virtually no market for this class. The prime usage of Tsiklon-4 will be for LEO and SSO payloads.Unless the Brazilian government wants to also make some small GTO satellites. Or they want to help their program watching someone else work. There's also the chance that they might open their range to other users. Korou is apparently used by ESA and Russia, so I don't think they will have an Angara or Rus-M launching from Brasil. India is very fine with where they are, ditto for China (which I seriously doubt would send anything abroad. But Ukrania is a very nice partner there.With Argentina there's a lot of satellite development. In fact INVAP (they made the SAC-C and SAC-D and are working on a couple of SAR satellites) have stated that they intend to work towards small and modular satellites that can work in parallel, or even bolt-on in space. Sweden might help here too. So having a less capable launch vehicle (at start) might help them (and us) to develop the technologies to integrate in space. Meanwhile, Argentina is using SpaceX for launches.
I don't think that Brazil can afford much more than Cyclone and VLS at this time, if even that. To worry about more advanced projects when these two long-standing projects aren't making much progress is probably not productive.
I've just thought. Nuclear powered submarines, solid LV development, the biggest oil deep ocean reserves, Venezuela's armament buys. Couldn't Brazil be buying and researching the technologies to make a submarine launched ICBM?
Maybe, but this has nothing to do with Cyclone-4, unless Brazil is planning the world's largest submarine.
Kyiv, Brasilia want to build international space center in Alcantara by 2014, says Azarovhttp://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/66375/
http://www.jasmine-galaxy.org/nano/nano-en.htmlNano-JASMINE is the technical demonstrator of JASMINE mission, and also the first space astrometry satellite mission in JAPAN. It will be launched at Aug. 2011 from Alcantara Launch Center at Brazil by Cyclon-4 rocket.
The construction is significant, but the November 2013 launch date seems to be based on someone raising more capital.
Yep, the article says that they are underwater financially.
The current Cyclone-4 capability can be augmented with SRBs to provide a much larger payload, per the user guide.
Also, the current price of Dnepr is rumored to be around $24 million for LEO payloads, so Cyclone-4 should be competitive for some LEO payloads. Of course, there continues the problem that Brazil never signed the MTCR, so US payloads may never fly on Cyclone-4.
Are you reading the v02 document? I did find that a 2tonnes to GTO version "is in development".
According to http://panoramaespacial.blogspot.pt/2012/10/itasat-1-no-voo-inaugural-do-cyclone-4.html (in Portuguese) the first launch of the Tsyklon-4 from Alcantara will probably also carry the ITASAT-1 Brazilian satellite.
Quote from: Satori on 10/16/2012 09:56 pmAccording to http://panoramaespacial.blogspot.pt/2012/10/itasat-1-no-voo-inaugural-do-cyclone-4.html (in Portuguese) the first launch of the Tsyklon-4 from Alcantara will probably also carry the ITASAT-1 Brazilian satellite.In November 2013? Really?
Remember that's Brazil. And 2014 is the World Cup year. I guess there will be a rush to get "important" milestones done on Q1, to make them "el mais grande du mundo". Don't expect much work done between June and August. I know my productivity will be hit heavily.
Brazil’s Cyclone-4 Project Hits Another Snag as Workers Laid Off
Project StatusCurrently, about 78% of the Launch Vehicle have been manufactured and 73% tested. About 48% of the Launch Site civil construction have been completed. Most of Ground Support Equipment has been contracted, and some has already been received in Alcantara. The first Cyclone-4 launch is estimated to take place in 2015.Below are some pictures showing the current situation:
Solo thx for posting pics of the impressive factory in Ukraine.If you have more please post.
The 7th QB50 workshop opened on Tuesday with the announcement that on Monday, January 27, 2014, the Von Karman Institute of Belgium signed the launch contract with Alcantara Cyclone Space for the launch of the QB50 constellation of 50 2U CubeSats into a 350 km low earth orbit for scientific research. The QB50 project is funded via the FP7 programme of the European Commission.
The precise QB50 launch date is still to be confirmed but the launch window is defined as being between December 2015 and November 2016.
The current events in Ukraine have not impacted the Cyclone-4 Project development. Currently, the Launch Vehicle development is progressing as scheduled, and it will be ready for delivery to Alcantara in the second half of 2015. A significant portion of the Launch Site civil construction activities has been completed as well. Most of Ground Support Equipment has been contracted, and some has already been received in Alcantara.http://alcantaracyclonespace.com/en/for-customers/project-status
Too early to assess, what impact the events in the Ukraine will have - not only for this project.
Quote from: Skyrocket on 03/03/2014 11:27 amToo early to assess, what impact the events in the Ukraine will have - not only for this project.Any idea who owns the site if things go bad in Ukraine? Can Russia claim ownership in the project?
Quote from: Prober on 04/22/2014 06:39 pmQuote from: Skyrocket on 03/03/2014 11:27 amToo early to assess, what impact the events in the Ukraine will have - not only for this project.Any idea who owns the site if things go bad in Ukraine? Can Russia claim ownership in the project?Alcantara belongs to the Brazillian Government (Air Force, I believe). The Yuhzove design bureau, I simply don't know.
Apparently, first launch is two years away, and has been for some 10 years.
Quote from: Danderman on 06/29/2014 11:33 pmApparently, first launch is two years away, and has been for some 10 years.Amazing, I was in contact with the company for a launch opportunity in 2010-2011. It is 2014 and there is still no light...
Somehow I just don't see this project ending up flying - which would be a shame to the interesting QB50 cubesat project, which somehow hopped on board instead of flying with the Chinese as originally planned.Any news about how much remains to be done in order for even pad fit tests to be done?
Rocket project in partnership with Ukraine heads to failure:http://www.aereo.jor.br/2015/02/15/projeto-de-foguete-em-parceria-com-ucrania-ruma-ao-fracasso/
Russians will not cooperate with Ukrainians.
At the end, I really wonder how EU and Von Karman cannot manage to arrange a good and reliable launch campaign...
The propaganda and current animosities aside they do in fact still cooperate a lot. Actually Russia is still by far Ukraine's most important trade partner and Ukraine still ranks high in Russia's list there, too.
Quote from: pippin on 03/12/2015 12:59 pmThe propaganda and current animosities aside they do in fact still cooperate a lot. Actually Russia is still by far Ukraine's most important trade partner and Ukraine still ranks high in Russia's list there, too.The common myth of Russian importance to post-Soviet states. Ukraine's most important trade partner is the EU. Russia is the second. http://stat.wto.org/CountryProfile/WSDBCountryPFView.aspx?Language=E&Country=UA
Quote from: bulkmail on 03/16/2015 04:59 pmQuote from: pippin on 03/12/2015 12:59 pmThe propaganda and current animosities aside they do in fact still cooperate a lot. Actually Russia is still by far Ukraine's most important trade partner and Ukraine still ranks high in Russia's list there, too.The common myth of Russian importance to post-Soviet states. Ukraine's most important trade partner is the EU. Russia is the second. http://stat.wto.org/CountryProfile/WSDBCountryPFView.aspx?Language=E&Country=UAThe EU is 28 countries. It's a bit like saying "the biggest trade partner is Asia".
No, the EU it's not like Asia... Asia doesn't have integrated foreign trade policy, customs union and integrated internal market with free movement of workers.
Trade to the EU in general and as a unified entity only makes a small part of Ukrainian foreign trade and it pales in comparison to the trade to Russia.Just go to, say, France or Spain or Italy and try to find any Ukrainian products there. Good luck. Berlin: sure. Poland: sure. London: probably. But the rest of the EU: really not a lot.
Brazilian Space news (Google Translate used below on video description and title:Projeto Espacial da ACS Está Abandonado no Maranhão (ACS Space project is abandoned in Maranhão)Reportagem exibida dia 08/04/2015 do jornal "Bom Dia Brasil" da Rede Globo, sobre as obras do projeto do sítio de lançamento do foguete Cyclone-4 da Alcântara Cyclone Space (ACS). As obras que já custaram R$ 1 bilhão ao Brasil e a Ucrânia estão completamente abandonadas numa área militar cedida pela Aeronáutica para o projeto. O projeto do "Cyclone 4" é uma parceria entre os governos do Brasil e da Ucrânia que previa o lançamento e a comercialização de satélites, a partir da base de Alcântara, no maranhão.------Report displayed day 04/08/2015 newspaper "Good Morning Brazil" Rede Globo, on the works of the launch site of the project Cyclone-4 rocket Alcantara Cyclone Space (ACS). The works that have cost US $ 1 billion to Brazil and Ukraine are completely abandoned in a military area ceded by the Air Force for the project. The project "Cyclone 4" is a partnership between the governments of Brazil and Ukraine that calls for the development and commercialization of satellites from the Alcantara base, in Maranhão.
Sorry for the late reply....The video says that the strategic space project is abandoned in the middle of Maranhão. The money spent by Brazil and the Ukraine is going down the drain.The site sits in the middle of a open space, a military area that was given for the project, and everything and all the works are stopped.The reporter on the field then says that it is obvious that everything is abandoned in place. The equipment is now rusty and all the material is abandoned long ago.The Tsyklon-4 is a joint project between the Ukraine and Brazil that was signed in 2003. The program aimed for the launch of commercial services from Alcantara Space Base. Ukraine doe not have space launch centers, so there was interest in an agreement with Brazil to launch the rockets developed in Europe and there were going to be shopped by plane to Brazil.A space company, Alcantara Cyclone Space, was created to take care of every logistic related to the project. The first launch would take place in 2015.The Brazilian Science and Technology Ministru didn't to comment, but in a note said that the project demanded more investment that changed the initial cost schedule. Also, the political crises in the Ukraine led to a lack of communication between the two nations. The Ukrainian foreign Minister will visit the launch site until the end of the first semester 2015, to debate the news project costs and new schedule.The Brazilian Government has a commission that is evaluating the restart of the work at the launch site or its definitive cancelation.
Thanks Olaf. That's not good news, although I guess the way the project had been going, not unexpected. The QB50 website is still showing Tsyklon 4 as the launch vehicle though.https://www.qb50.eu/index.php/project-description-obj/launch-vehicle
The QB50 team is well aware, that the Tsiklon-4 will not be available. They told me, that they are in final negotiations with another launch provider and would therefore not disclosing the details. According to the contact at QB50, the website will be updated after announcing the launch vehicle, including the final list of qb50 satellites.
Even if they have signed the agreement with Arianespace for Soyuz launch, it is not that easy to install final platform on the launch vehicle. Due to the enormous size, launching Soyuz with the QB50 platform only, will be far more expensive than the project budget can handle. Thus, I belive it shall be much much smaller and less expensive launch vehicle, that is capable of handling such structure on board.
Quote from: osiossim on 04/13/2015 11:15 amEven if they have signed the agreement with Arianespace for Soyuz launch, it is not that easy to install final platform on the launch vehicle. Due to the enormous size, launching Soyuz with the QB50 platform only, will be far more expensive than the project budget can handle. Thus, I believe it shall be much much smaller and less expensive launch vehicle, that is capable of handling such structure on board.I don't think, it will be on a dedicated Soyuz launcher - this would be overkill . I guess, QB50 will be a secondary payload. The 13 quadpacks should fit on an ASAP-S secondary launch structure. The Sentinel-1B mission could have enough spare capacity.
Even if they have signed the agreement with Arianespace for Soyuz launch, it is not that easy to install final platform on the launch vehicle. Due to the enormous size, launching Soyuz with the QB50 platform only, will be far more expensive than the project budget can handle. Thus, I believe it shall be much much smaller and less expensive launch vehicle, that is capable of handling such structure on board.
VonKarman said;"Consequently, the contract was signed at the von Karman Institute the 27th of January 2014, just one day ahead of the 7th QB50 Workshop. It sets the main launch parameters such as the orbit being ~98 degrees and a 380 km altitude, and also the targeted launch date January 2016."@ https://www.qb50.eu/index.php/project-description-obj/launch-vehicle While Sentinel-1 is SAR satellite and will be launched to 690 km altitude; "Sentinel-1B is a C-band radar observation satellite, using SAR (synthetic aperture radar) technology. It will be placed in a Sun-synchronous orbit at an altitude of about 690 km..."@ http://www.arianespace.com/news-press-release/2014/7-17-2014-Sentinel-1B.aspCan someone update us, if Soyuz can release different playloads on different altitudes, like Dnepr? I don't think QB50 consortium will be ready to release the satellites at 690 km, while the satellite design is according to 380 km.
The rough Soyuz launch service cost from CSG is about 86 M € per launch. If ESA does not subsidize QB50, VonKarman can hardly bear the cost of launch with Soyuz.
Quote from: osiossim on 04/15/2015 11:46 amThe rough Soyuz launch service cost from CSG is about 86 M € per launch. If ESA does not subsidize QB50, VonKarman can hardly bear the cost of launch with Soyuz.They do not need a dedicated Soyuz, they will fly as a secondary payload.
Here's a week old update from Yuzhnoye itself: http://www.yuzhnoye.com/en/press-center/pressrelises/pressrelis-copy_39.htmlLooks like they're considering launching from North America, partnering up with whoever is willing to take on the construction costs for the launch site.
Interesting presser just turned up from Yuzhnoye!