Quote from: jimvela on 05/28/2010 10:18 pmQuote from: EE Scott on 05/28/2010 10:04 pmOh great. They didn't think about that aspect of three cores during the design process for the Heavy? I wonder how responsive they would be with the seven-core Super Heavy concept they talk about from time to time. One launch every five years???Why in the world would you want 7 D-IV cores? If anything, find a way to put two large solids on the side and you have a heavy lifter ala the titan...FWIW, I think that the largest Delta-IV configurations that we're likely to see is the tri-core heavy with two GEM-60 SRMs on each core and the 4 x RL-10B-2 common upper stage. That would be about 50t IMLEO, pretty much sufficient for an LEO mission module and good enough for a two-launch or depot-supported single-launch of a BEO mission module and EDS.
Quote from: EE Scott on 05/28/2010 10:04 pmOh great. They didn't think about that aspect of three cores during the design process for the Heavy? I wonder how responsive they would be with the seven-core Super Heavy concept they talk about from time to time. One launch every five years???Why in the world would you want 7 D-IV cores? If anything, find a way to put two large solids on the side and you have a heavy lifter ala the titan...
Oh great. They didn't think about that aspect of three cores during the design process for the Heavy? I wonder how responsive they would be with the seven-core Super Heavy concept they talk about from time to time. One launch every five years???
Quote from: Damon Hill on 05/28/2010 09:01 pmApart from having to beef up the core, why would the Heavy be significantly different from the Mediums? Parts/systems commonality was supposed to be a big advantage of the Delta 4 family's concept.There are 6 separate core configurations.http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=15541.msg357064#msg357064
Apart from having to beef up the core, why would the Heavy be significantly different from the Mediums? Parts/systems commonality was supposed to be a big advantage of the Delta 4 family's concept.
Quote from: Ben the Space Brit on 05/28/2010 10:41 pmQuote from: jimvela on 05/28/2010 10:18 pmQuote from: EE Scott on 05/28/2010 10:04 pmOh great. They didn't think about that aspect of three cores during the design process for the Heavy? I wonder how responsive they would be with the seven-core Super Heavy concept they talk about from time to time. One launch every five years???Why in the world would you want 7 D-IV cores? If anything, find a way to put two large solids on the side and you have a heavy lifter ala the titan...FWIW, I think that the largest Delta-IV configurations that we're likely to see is the tri-core heavy with two GEM-60 SRMs on each core and the 4 x RL-10B-2 common upper stage. That would be about 50t IMLEO, pretty much sufficient for an LEO mission module and good enough for a two-launch or depot-supported single-launch of a BEO mission module and EDS.Also, add in the RS-68A there. Maybe even prop cross-feed. I wonder what such a monster could launch on a ballistic trajectory to EML1/2? Or TLI? Or Earth Escape?
Two satellites launched this year from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station have successfully completed on-orbit testing and are ready for service.The first in a $1.6 billion program of new Global Positioning Systems satellites, known as Block IIF, launched late May 27 on its fourth attempt atop a United Launch Alliance Delta IV rocket.The Air Force today announced that the spacecraft called GPS IIF-01 became operational Aug. 26., flying 11,000 nautical miles above Earth in the constellation's "B-2" slot.The satellite joined 30 others in orbit, several of which are aging an nearing the end of their operational lives. The constellation uses a minimum of 24 satellites to provide precision location, navigation and time information for military and civilian users.