Quote from: mlorrey on 09/23/2010 01:48 amQuote from: Robotbeat on 09/22/2010 12:27 amQuote from: mlorrey on 09/21/2010 10:12 pmMars has literally trillions of tons of hematite crystals lying around on the martian surface (the blueberries in the rover pics). Once we get some industry going there, martian steel will be the most useful and affordable structural product.Forget that, iron meteorites are littering the surface of Mars! Based on the rovers' findings, I'd guesstimate roughly 1 ton of free metal every 1 or 2 square kilometers. Within 100km radius of a base, there could be roughly 50,000 tons of free metal! True that. No need for any convoluted exercises with basalt or spinning nanotubes out of CO2. Just install some nuke plants and start melting stuff down.OK - Let's see a design for a system to harvest, say 3,000 tons of free metal, bringing it back to the smelter. And sending the kids out to pile the iron rocks into fence rows is disallowed. Just to make this more of a challenge, we are addressing the first 3,000 tons, starting with ton number one.
Quote from: Robotbeat on 09/22/2010 12:27 amQuote from: mlorrey on 09/21/2010 10:12 pmMars has literally trillions of tons of hematite crystals lying around on the martian surface (the blueberries in the rover pics). Once we get some industry going there, martian steel will be the most useful and affordable structural product.Forget that, iron meteorites are littering the surface of Mars! Based on the rovers' findings, I'd guesstimate roughly 1 ton of free metal every 1 or 2 square kilometers. Within 100km radius of a base, there could be roughly 50,000 tons of free metal! True that. No need for any convoluted exercises with basalt or spinning nanotubes out of CO2. Just install some nuke plants and start melting stuff down.
Quote from: mlorrey on 09/21/2010 10:12 pmMars has literally trillions of tons of hematite crystals lying around on the martian surface (the blueberries in the rover pics). Once we get some industry going there, martian steel will be the most useful and affordable structural product.Forget that, iron meteorites are littering the surface of Mars! Based on the rovers' findings, I'd guesstimate roughly 1 ton of free metal every 1 or 2 square kilometers. Within 100km radius of a base, there could be roughly 50,000 tons of free metal!
Mars has literally trillions of tons of hematite crystals lying around on the martian surface (the blueberries in the rover pics). Once we get some industry going there, martian steel will be the most useful and affordable structural product.
Quote from: aero on 09/23/2010 03:01 amQuote from: mlorrey on 09/23/2010 01:48 amQuote from: Robotbeat on 09/22/2010 12:27 amQuote from: mlorrey on 09/21/2010 10:12 pmMars has literally trillions of tons of hematite crystals lying around on the martian surface (the blueberries in the rover pics). Once we get some industry going there, martian steel will be the most useful and affordable structural product.Forget that, iron meteorites are littering the surface of Mars! Based on the rovers' findings, I'd guesstimate roughly 1 ton of free metal every 1 or 2 square kilometers. Within 100km radius of a base, there could be roughly 50,000 tons of free metal! True that. No need for any convoluted exercises with basalt or spinning nanotubes out of CO2. Just install some nuke plants and start melting stuff down.OK - Let's see a design for a system to harvest, say 3,000 tons of free metal, bringing it back to the smelter. And sending the kids out to pile the iron rocks into fence rows is disallowed. Just to make this more of a challenge, we are addressing the first 3,000 tons, starting with ton number one.Electric pickup truck plus a couple astronauts and a winch. Remember, a 300 kg meteorite would only weigh 100 kg-f on Mars. I bet you could gather a few tons every day. May need to distribute solar powered recharge stations to extend the range of the rovers. Spectroscopic surveys from orbit or from balloon or something could identify iron meteorites.
I'd imagine that the colonists would be building mini mills designed to melt the iron, perhaps add carbon (produced in-situ, of course!) if necessary for improved material properties, and cast directly into sheets and beams. I'm sure such mini mills (micro mills would probably be a better term) would have relatively small batch sizes to keep their mass low.The sheets and beams could then be welded together to form pressure vessels for base expansion. The nice thing about Mars is it's practically a soft vacuum, so electron beam welding can work better than at Earth pressure.
My point in raising these questions is to figure out what we will need to take along when we go to Mars. So far, I have one electron beam welder. Or do we plan to make that on site from native materials?I guess we'll just have to put up an air tight tent in the Utah high desert, and using fabricated Mars iron rocks, make some structural steel inside the tent. And keep records of everything we have to bring in.
Quote from: mlorrey on 09/23/2010 01:48 amQuote from: Robotbeat on 09/22/2010 12:27 amForget that, iron meteorites are littering the surface of Mars! Based on the rovers' findings, I'd guesstimate roughly 1 ton of free metal every 1 or 2 square kilometers. Within 100km radius of a base, there could be roughly 50,000 tons of free metal! True that. No need for any convoluted exercises with basalt or spinning nanotubes out of CO2. Just install some nuke plants and start melting stuff down.Basalt? Nanotubes? If you're talking about material for an elevator or tether, iron is ridiculous.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_tensile_strength#Typical_tensile_strengthsMartian iron might be good for local use. But Mars' gravity well and atmosphere precludes Martian iron as an export to anywhere but Mars' neighborhood, in my opinion.
Quote from: Robotbeat on 09/22/2010 12:27 amForget that, iron meteorites are littering the surface of Mars! Based on the rovers' findings, I'd guesstimate roughly 1 ton of free metal every 1 or 2 square kilometers. Within 100km radius of a base, there could be roughly 50,000 tons of free metal! True that. No need for any convoluted exercises with basalt or spinning nanotubes out of CO2. Just install some nuke plants and start melting stuff down.
Forget that, iron meteorites are littering the surface of Mars! Based on the rovers' findings, I'd guesstimate roughly 1 ton of free metal every 1 or 2 square kilometers. Within 100km radius of a base, there could be roughly 50,000 tons of free metal!
Quote from: Robotbeat on 09/23/2010 06:37 pmI'd imagine that the colonists would be building mini mills designed to melt the iron, perhaps add carbon (produced in-situ, of course!) if necessary for improved material properties, and cast directly into sheets and beams. I'm sure such mini mills (micro mills would probably be a better term) would have relatively small batch sizes to keep their mass low.The sheets and beams could then be welded together to form pressure vessels for base expansion. The nice thing about Mars is it's practically a soft vacuum, so electron beam welding can work better than at Earth pressure.My point in raising these questions is to figure out what we will need to take along when we go to Mars. So far, I have one electron beam welder. Or do we plan to make that on site from native materials?I guess we'll just have to put up an air tight tent in the Utah high desert, and using fabricated Mars iron rocks, make some structural steel inside the tent. And keep records of everything we have to bring in.