Well, knowing that the air you are breathing is of the purest quality should contribute positively to mental health. Works for me.
The solution is to send larger crews.
Quote from: Twark_Main on 09/08/2023 05:24 pmQuote from: Valerij Zhilisky on 09/07/2023 10:02 pmQuote from: Twark_Main on 08/10/2023 02:39 pmIf you prefer, replace the word "precious" with "costly."As deadman points out, one of the costlier elements is the part where you clean and purify the raw gas into human-rated breathing gas. This will probably exclude dirtier material streams, like mineral processing. In fact, near-ready medical grade oxygen will be produced in huge quantities in the production of methane, rocket fuel. In the Sabatier reaction, one of the products is pure water, the oxygen obtained during its electrolysis will only need to be dried, for example, to freeze out water vapor. Nitrogen at the exit from the cryogenic separator of the Martian atmosphere will also be quite pure. "Near-ready" and "ready" are not the same thing.The purity of the end products is a function of the purity of input products.Those input products (Martian water and Martian CO2) are only going to be purified enough to balance extending the lifetime of the ISRU equipment with the cost and complexity of the purification process itself.So no, I doubt the oxygen coming out the the ISRU generator will automatically be "medical grade." In principle you are right, but in this particular case you are wrong. In the Sabatier reaction we use hydrogen obtained from Martian water and the compressed Martian atmosphere (almost pure carbon dioxide) to produce methane. We are not interested in the problem of methane extraction in this particular case, we are interested in the by-product of the reaction - liquid water, which is easily separated from the mixture of gases. A small amount of dissolved carbon dioxide remains in the water. In the next step, this almost chemically pure water is electrolyzed and separated into oxygen gas and hydrogen. The hydrogen is returned to the Sabatier reactor, the oxygen is liquefied. When the oxygen is liquefied, it cools and the impurities of water vapor and carbon dioxide in it are separated, so the output is pure liquid oxygen of medical quality, which can be used to replenish the atmosphere of the living modules. Thus, if we do not mix water from the Sabatier reactor with water extracted on Mars, and use a separate process line to process water from the reactor, we get a large amount of pure medical-grade liquid oxygen.
Quote from: Valerij Zhilisky on 09/07/2023 10:02 pmQuote from: Twark_Main on 08/10/2023 02:39 pmIf you prefer, replace the word "precious" with "costly."As deadman points out, one of the costlier elements is the part where you clean and purify the raw gas into human-rated breathing gas. This will probably exclude dirtier material streams, like mineral processing. In fact, near-ready medical grade oxygen will be produced in huge quantities in the production of methane, rocket fuel. In the Sabatier reaction, one of the products is pure water, the oxygen obtained during its electrolysis will only need to be dried, for example, to freeze out water vapor. Nitrogen at the exit from the cryogenic separator of the Martian atmosphere will also be quite pure. "Near-ready" and "ready" are not the same thing.The purity of the end products is a function of the purity of input products.Those input products (Martian water and Martian CO2) are only going to be purified enough to balance extending the lifetime of the ISRU equipment with the cost and complexity of the purification process itself.So no, I doubt the oxygen coming out the the ISRU generator will automatically be "medical grade."
Quote from: Twark_Main on 08/10/2023 02:39 pmIf you prefer, replace the word "precious" with "costly."As deadman points out, one of the costlier elements is the part where you clean and purify the raw gas into human-rated breathing gas. This will probably exclude dirtier material streams, like mineral processing. In fact, near-ready medical grade oxygen will be produced in huge quantities in the production of methane, rocket fuel. In the Sabatier reaction, one of the products is pure water, the oxygen obtained during its electrolysis will only need to be dried, for example, to freeze out water vapor. Nitrogen at the exit from the cryogenic separator of the Martian atmosphere will also be quite pure.
If you prefer, replace the word "precious" with "costly."As deadman points out, one of the costlier elements is the part where you clean and purify the raw gas into human-rated breathing gas. This will probably exclude dirtier material streams, like mineral processing.
Quote from: Valerij Zhilisky on 09/09/2023 05:31 amQuote from: Twark_Main on 09/08/2023 05:24 pmQuote from: Valerij Zhilisky on 09/07/2023 10:02 pmQuote from: Twark_Main on 08/10/2023 02:39 pmIf you prefer, replace the word "precious" with "costly."As deadman points out, one of the costlier elements is the part where you clean and purify the raw gas into human-rated breathing gas. This will probably exclude dirtier material streams, like mineral processing. In fact, near-ready medical grade oxygen will be produced in huge quantities in the production of methane, rocket fuel. In the Sabatier reaction, one of the products is pure water, the oxygen obtained during its electrolysis will only need to be dried, for example, to freeze out water vapor. Nitrogen at the exit from the cryogenic separator of the Martian atmosphere will also be quite pure. "Near-ready" and "ready" are not the same thing.The purity of the end products is a function of the purity of input products.Those input products (Martian water and Martian CO2) are only going to be purified enough to balance extending the lifetime of the ISRU equipment with the cost and complexity of the purification process itself.So no, I doubt the oxygen coming out the the ISRU generator will automatically be "medical grade." In principle you are right, but in this particular case you are wrong. In the Sabatier reaction we use hydrogen obtained from Martian water and the compressed Martian atmosphere (almost pure carbon dioxide) to produce methane. We are not interested in the problem of methane extraction in this particular case, we are interested in the by-product of the reaction - liquid water, which is easily separated from the mixture of gases. A small amount of dissolved carbon dioxide remains in the water. In the next step, this almost chemically pure water is electrolyzed and separated into oxygen gas and hydrogen. The hydrogen is returned to the Sabatier reactor, the oxygen is liquefied. When the oxygen is liquefied, it cools and the impurities of water vapor and carbon dioxide in it are separated, so the output is pure liquid oxygen of medical quality, which can be used to replenish the atmosphere of the living modules. Thus, if we do not mix water from the Sabatier reactor with water extracted on Mars, and use a separate process line to process water from the reactor, we get a large amount of pure medical-grade liquid oxygen. Your leap from "almost" to "pure medical-grade" is the problem, of course.I can have "almost" pure air, but if it's 99.9% air and 0.1% carbon monoxide you're going to have a bad time... They will defiinitely 100% be scrubbing, purifying, and testing the air before introducing it inside the habitat. To do otherwise would be an easily avoidable error (malfeasance? negligence?) on the same level as the Titan implosion. "Don't do nuthin' dumb."
IF the procedure produces 0.1% CO, thats super bad for anyone involved. Unless its 99.9999999% perfect, everyone will suffocate and die from CO poisoning.
I think people don't realize just how much carbon monoxide is made by, like, candles and a normal wood fire which folks breath the fumes of. Carbon monoxide isn't great for you, and it's a real health problem with indoor stoves, but it's also not like a parts-per-billion-will-kill-you thing.
Quote from: Robotbeat on 06/25/2024 03:18 amI think people don't realize just how much carbon monoxide is made by, like, candles and a normal wood fire which folks breath the fumes of. Carbon monoxide isn't great for you, and it's a real health problem with indoor stoves, but it's also not like a parts-per-billion-will-kill-you thing.Incomplete combustion isn't a big deal on earth, because you have an entire planet of air to exchange with. On mars have don't. You only have the air in the can, and if the o2 machine is making CO, the only place for it to go is your lungs.
Quote from: deadman1204 on 06/25/2024 09:34 pmQuote from: Robotbeat on 06/25/2024 03:18 amI think people don't realize just how much carbon monoxide is made by, like, candles and a normal wood fire which folks breath the fumes of. Carbon monoxide isn't great for you, and it's a real health problem with indoor stoves, but it's also not like a parts-per-billion-will-kill-you thing.Incomplete combustion isn't a big deal on earth, because you have an entire planet of air to exchange with. On mars have don't. You only have the air in the can, and if the o2 machine is making CO, the only place for it to go is your lungs.There are such things as CO filters and alarms
Quote from: Dalhousie on 06/26/2024 05:41 amQuote from: deadman1204 on 06/25/2024 09:34 pmQuote from: Robotbeat on 06/25/2024 03:18 amI think people don't realize just how much carbon monoxide is made by, like, candles and a normal wood fire which folks breath the fumes of. Carbon monoxide isn't great for you, and it's a real health problem with indoor stoves, but it's also not like a parts-per-billion-will-kill-you thing.Incomplete combustion isn't a big deal on earth, because you have an entire planet of air to exchange with. On mars have don't. You only have the air in the can, and if the o2 machine is making CO, the only place for it to go is your lungs.There are such things as CO filters and alarmsYes. My original point is precisely that you do need such controls, filters, and sensors in order to make "medical grade" oxygen for the internal atmosphere.Anyway, back to the topic of Mental Health of isolated outpost residents...Does anyone have a citation for the British Arctic (Antarctic?) base that O'Neill mentions?